"Top level index page"
Pagetitle: "The sun pages"
Date: 21-9-1999
File: %index.r
Author: "Martin Steigerwald"
Description: "My mighty webpage"
Keywords: ["Amiga" "The sun pages"]
Link-Title: &q
> > We've all ready got a "dialect" for HTML written in
> > REBOL. A lot of what you've all ready written we've thought about all
> > ready. We should definitely talk some more!
> That's right. The things is really useful for web-page creation. It can be
> extended over time with needed featu
> While (hopefully) someone is looking, are there any plans for Rebol/DOS? I
> know... DOS is old and antiquated and has no multitasking or windowing
> features, but it IS SMALL, and FREE/CHEAP (DRDOS, FREEDOS, etc), and
> requires very little computing resources... ideal for many of the
> appli
> This IS in our future (see www.aplio.com for just one example), and to
> simply equate it to ancient DOS machines is missing the implications of this
> picture. Not all interesting/useful "networking" or "messaging" apps
> require 32-bit machines (and Windows and graphics and O/S's and OVERHEA
> > I'm quite serious about the Rebol on DOS question
>
> The question is pointless unless a PC DOS has a TCP/IP stack.
IMHO one could still use some small flavor of Linux on that 386 or 486
machine then. Has TCP/IP and it should be possible to get a REBOL for it.
--
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwa
> You miss the point, as well. "BACK?" to 16-bit systems??? Both 16-bit AND
> 8-bit micros are alive and well in the embedded world.. surprise! Just take
> a look at the very active development of new chips at Microchip
> (www.microchip.com) or Hitachi for current examples. Perhaps the upcomin
> You (and Bo) seem to totally miss the point. I'm not talking about personal
> comptuer uses, but embedded systems. Designing, implementing, manufacturing
> them as products... not something for my own personal use.
Sorry... I was serious about my post. It was not meant in sarcasm or
ironigcal
> also with parenthesis:
>
> >> + 3 ( 4 + 5 )
> == 13
> >> + 2 ( 3 + 4 )
> == 10
This is no wierd Pentium bug, isn't it? ;-)
--
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://helios.home.pages.de
PGP: http://home.pages.de/~helios/autor/wie-erreichen.html
Hi!
When developing on REBOL scripts a error happens from time to time. REBOL
then displays what happened and where it happened. The what is often quite
okay, but the where sucks.
Look at this example:
---
REBOL [] do %include.r include %html.r
return-stuff: func []
[
"Stuff"
]
return-e
> In that case; please do fling me an Amiga version, once available. :)
>
> (You might as well send it to all list subscribers by the looks of it...;)
Just post it to the list ;-) *nah, just kidding* would not be a good idea
to post 20 versions for different platforms to this list.
--
Martin
> What's next for REBOL...
> "More than just a tool."
Hi!
I had not much time to read this mailing list in the last weeks. But then
I saw a thread which really got quite big. And all the people told
everyone "Me too!"... First I was annoyed, but now I browsed to the
original mail of this thread
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am Sun, 6 Feb 2000 16:31:37 +0900 über
"[REBOL] New format.r on rebol.org" in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The main reason for writing FORMAT (the main function in format.r) was the
> lack of any control over how numbers are formed in REBOL. There are at l
12 matches
Mail list logo
