[REBOL] save bug Re:(3)

2000-09-15 Thread jimg
Latest is 0.10.33.3.1. Give it a try. There were some fixes to the mold function. - jim At 02:34 PM 9/15/2000 -0700, you wrote: >about box says: > >rebol/view Version 0.10.29.3.1 > >running on win98SE >I think it is latest view version... > >rishi >- Original Message - >From: <[EMAIL

[REBOL] save bug Re:

2000-09-15 Thread jimg
What version are you using? The latest experimental builds don't seem to exhibit this behavior. - jim At 01:39 PM 9/15/2000 -0700, you wrote: >Here is a bug I found while programming rebol. do following in rebol shell: > > >> obj: make object! [ >[f: "field" ] > >> save %shoot.txt obj > >

[REBOL] who invented rebol? Re:

2000-08-27 Thread jimg
The original and subsequent language design have all been done by Carl himself. Carl also programmed the original Alpha implementation. The 1.X implementation was primarily programmed by Joe Marshall with some last minute help from me and Sterling. The 2.0 implementation was completely rewritt

[REBOL] Few words Re:

2000-08-12 Thread jimg
Hi Alex, Carl posted a preliminary spec for modules on the ALLY list. Once that has been finalized and implemented, that limitation will be removed. - jim At 02:06 PM 8/12/2000 +0200, you wrote: > >- Open Your Mind -< > > > >Quoting from [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s message (12-Aug-00 02:32:24). > >l

[REBOL] ODBC Connection Re:

2000-08-03 Thread jimg
The way to open a command port has been changed from: db-port: make dbase [ scheme: 'odbc ] to: db-port: first dbase Think of the dbase port as a factory that makes command ports. - jim At 02:46 PM 8/4/2000 +1000, you wrote: >I am using win95 ver of rebol/command for the first time, and th

[REBOL] Another bug in Rebol/Core 2.3 Re:

2000-07-21 Thread jimg
Hi Cal, This is by design. In the case of blocks or tuples, there is an implied order which can be used to sort the values and compare them. In the case of pairs, both values in a pair have equal weight, thus it isn't really possible to do a magnitude comparison because of the situation where

[REBOL] Reading Binary data Re:

2000-07-15 Thread jimg
At 08:11 PM 7/15/2000 -0800, you wrote: >I want to open a file for read-only binary access. >Move to a specific offset in the file and read a >specific number of bytes: >I've tried this, but I'm doing something wrong > >fp: open/read/direct/binary %TestBin.txt >skip fp 10 ;move to offset 10 >buff

[REBOL] Find speed Re:(4)

2000-07-07 Thread jimg
Umm, the reason that the hash is slow is that it only hashes string type values. The test you were using had numeric values. Try your tests with strings and you should see a significant difference and I will add numeric values to the hash as well for the next release... However, I'm not planni

[REBOL] Webcam URL Re:(2)

2000-06-30 Thread jimg
I'm guessing that the AirBorne Express driver bumped something when he went in or out - jim At 07:40 AM 7/1/2000 +1000, you wrote: >How often is it updated? Looks like its stuck on Friday June 30, 2000 >1:22:25PM > >Or has someone just stuck a picture to the lense :-) > >Cheers, > >Allen

[REBOL] list values and series operations ... Re:(3)

2000-06-12 Thread jimg
At the present time, both the head and tail of a list! are quick to access as well as next and back of the current index. - jim At 12:50 PM 6/12/2000 -0400, you wrote: > >List!s are actually stored differently from blocks, paths and hashes, > >so any operation on them requires special code

[REBOL] list values and series operations ... Re:

2000-06-10 Thread jimg
Hi Petr, List!s are actually stored differently from blocks, paths and hashes, so any operation on them requires special code that has not been implemented for all action types. - jim At 12:57 PM 6/10/2000 +0200, you wrote: >Hi, > >I today looked at hash and list datatypes and found out fol

[REBOL] weird behavior of /view Re:

2000-06-09 Thread jimg
Hi galt, There was a change made for REBOL/View ( and in the future for all REBOL versions ) such that if REBOL is started with the name of a script, after the script terminates, REBOL terminates as well. This allows for the launching of scripts by other scripts without having a quit at the e

[REBOL] crlf and newline (was parsing by period and newline) Re:(5)

2000-06-06 Thread jimg
Even better is to use /WITH which allows you to specify exactly the line ending you want. - jim At 06:53 PM 6/6/2000 +0200, you wrote: >Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED]! > >On 06-Giu-00, you wrote: > > F> Sounds good ... but HOW can I FORCE Rebol to write LF back > F> (even under Windozze ???) > >Yo

[REBOL] 'open bugs? Re:(3)

2000-04-14 Thread jimg
No, try opening /read. /new will truncate the file if it exists. That's the difference. - jim At 05:55 AM 4/14/2000, you wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Hi Petr, > > > > Open opens for reading and writing by default. When a program is executing, > > there is a handle open to it for l

[REBOL] 'open bugs? Re:

2000-04-14 Thread jimg
Hi Petr, Open opens for reading and writing by default. When a program is executing, there is a handle open to it for loading resources/overlays. So, if you try to open it for write, it fails. However, you can open it for reading only by using open/read. Hope this clears it up for you! - ji

[REBOL] [REBOL]how to save output to file? Re:

2000-03-07 Thread jimg
Try doing a "help echo". That will show you that doing: echo %out.txt will copy all output to the file OUT.TXT as well as the console. Do a: echo none to terminate the ECHO. Hope this helps. - jim At 02:06 AM 3/7/2000, you wrote: >Hi all! >I'm a newbie, quite excited about the possibiliti

[REBOL] tuple oddity Re:

2000-02-03 Thread jimg
Unfortunately, if you display a tuple! with just two elements, it will look like a decimal value. So, the decision was made to allow smaller dimension tuples, but always to display them with at least three values. - jim At 12:22 AM 2/4/00 +0900, you wrote: >Hi, > >Here's something weird I j

[REBOL] [REBOL]Illegal PORT Command Re:

2000-01-31 Thread jimg
Hi Tim, Works fine for me. Are you going through a proxy server of some kind? Try trace/net on and see if it gives any more information. - jim At 12:03 PM 1/31/00 -0900, you wrote: >The following code; >read ftp://jazz.trumpet.com.au/ >result in the following error message from rebol: >conne

[REBOL] 2 trivial problems with view demos Re:

2000-01-29 Thread jimg
Sounds like you are running on an older version of the FAT file system that doesn't support long file names. It will be added to the list. Thanks for the info. - jim At 04:28 PM 1/29/00 -0500, you wrote: >The demo menu program tries to execute calculator.r...but the file name >is calculat.r

[REBOL] FTP Access needs configuration Re:

2000-01-29 Thread jimg
Try doing a "trace/net on" and try it again. That will provide more useful information. If you post it, look for and edit out your user and password information. Hope this helps. - jim At 11:19 AM 1/29/00 -0900, you wrote: >The following code: >;;=

[REBOL] REBOL/View Re:(14)

2000-01-29 Thread jimg
There was a problem with the mail system that shut it down for a couple of hours after the first few went out. It should be fairly quick now. - jim At 12:21 PM 1/29/00 -0800, you wrote: >Allen asked: > > How long did it take for view to turn up? I sent the email about 1 hour >ago, still waiti

[REBOL] I'm not on the list for /view?! (was: REBOL/View ) Re:(16)

2000-01-29 Thread jimg
At 04:50 PM 1/29/00 +0100, you wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > What's going on?! I'm not a member of the "first wave" beta testers? > > > > Is this my fault because I didn't want to me-to the "I wanna be a /view > > beta tester"? Yes. Does it matter that I've been driving everyone I kno

[REBOL] rebol & Pandora Re:(4)

2000-01-29 Thread jimg
At 03:45 AM 1/29/00 -0800, you wrote: >If you set system/schemes/e-mail/proxy: false, it will bypass the standard >proxy setting. Hope this helps! > > - jim Whoops, you need to set it for system/schemes/pop/proxy and system/schemes/smtp/proxy separately. Hope this works better. - jim

[REBOL] rebol & Pandora Re:(3)

2000-01-29 Thread jimg
If you set system/schemes/e-mail/proxy: false, it will bypass the standard proxy setting. Hope this helps! - jim At 10:47 AM 1/29/00 +0100, you wrote: >um... I was mailing to an address at my provider - not the other side of the >globe! >Please read my original question below very carefully -

[REBOL] It's on it's way!!!!!

2000-01-29 Thread jimg
News Flash!! REBOL/View Beta 0.9.0 is done and e-mails are going out as I type!! Hooray!!!

[REBOL] REBOL/View Re:(8)

2000-01-29 Thread jimg
At 12:59 AM 1/29/00 -0800, you wrote: >Just a survey. How many of you are, like me, sitting here in the middle >of the night checking your email every 5 minutes in anticipation of /view? > >(My girlfriend is begging me to come to bed.) Doesn't she understand history is about to be made?!? Coun

[REBOL] [REBOL] REBOL/View Re:(7)

2000-01-29 Thread jimg
At 09:54 AM 1/29/00 +0100, you wrote: >Jim, >you're a criminal, you're killing us with curiosity! :) Good news Paolo!! They're building the distribution now... Can you feel the excitement and the tension building? ( How come the europeans always get the betas first? :) ) Keep your fingers cross

[REBOL] REBOL/View Re:(7)

2000-01-29 Thread jimg
Arggg! More tweaking! It's a beta for heaven's sake! Just ship it so I can get some sleep!!! ;-) ( Though I'll want to hear what Petr thinks at least :-) "We will ship no software before it's tweaked!" - Anonymous Software Guru

[REBOL] REBOL/View Re:(6)

2000-01-29 Thread jimg
At 08:20 AM 1/29/00 +0100, you wrote: >Gee, I will stay on-line then. Will stop all house-keeping :-) > >btw: I have only 28.8 kbs connection, so The Screensaver's show was of bad >quality >here. But, am I mistaken I saw some catalogue demo or what, with text >placed on >pictures, etc? Am I mist

[REBOL] REBOL/View Re:(4)

2000-01-28 Thread jimg
Definitely hours!!! and not very many at that! - jim Give me a V! Give me an I! Give me an E! Give me a W! Go VIEW!!! At 07:58 AM 1/29/00 +0100, you wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > You may be closer than you think. > >Aaach, if we are talking hours, not days, release docs

[REBOL] REBOL/View Re:(2)

2000-01-28 Thread jimg
You may be closer than you think. - jim At 03:34 PM 1/28/00 -0800, you wrote: >Hi Mike, > >you wrote: > >Hello, > > > >I just noticed this on todays (Friday 1/28/2000) Zdnet Screensavers Web > >page, where they were talking about REBOL. > > > > > >"The beta release of REBOL/View begins

[REBOL] The forthcoming REBOL/View Re:(4)

2000-01-28 Thread jimg
At 01:25 PM 1/28/00 +0100, you wrote: >PS: does it do smooth scrolling? ;-) Hi Petr, If you are expecting Flash, you'll be disappointed, BUT if you are looking for an insanely easy way to create GUI interfaces, you'll be very happy! I'm at the point of just writing demo's now to try and push

[REBOL] Update file as port/Security Re:(4)

2000-01-27 Thread jimg
> >If you go from secure allow for instance to secure throw, now permission is >required, since you are raising security level. Going back to secure allow >will again require your explicit permission. Hi Elan, Actually, you only get prompted for permission if you attempt to lower security level

[REBOL] Catch Carl on ZDTV tonight Re:(9)

2000-01-27 Thread jimg
ZDTV is on DSS for those who have it! - jim

[REBOL] [REBOL] Updating a file as a port Re:(2)

2000-01-26 Thread jimg
At 02:17 PM 1/26/00 -0800, you wrote: >The /write refinement disables read operations! > > >Solution: > >Use the /mode refinement with a block [lines read write] like this: Hi Elan, Gee, you really just need to open the file with /lines. The default is read and write. ;-) - jim

[REBOL] When? Re:

2000-01-25 Thread jimg
Hi Allen, Well, we're down to the last few bits ( Carl keeps asking us for things, but he seems to be slowing down (-; ), the scribes are scribbling away with their quill pens documenting all the features we keep adding, and of course, the nasty boys ( QA ) need to finish their go at it as we

[REBOL] console commands Re:

2000-01-25 Thread jimg
Not currently in a system independent manner. If you know the sequence that will do it for your system, you can always output them yourself. - jim At 01:09 PM 1/25/00 -0800, you wrote: >Is there a way to change the color of the text using a terminal output >sequence? > >James A. Roberts

[REBOL] Where is that string comming from? Re:(2)

2000-01-25 Thread jimg
Good job Elan! Yes, the bug is in compose. Yo Jeff! ( Jim points his finger... ;-) At 02:39 PM 1/25/00 -0800, you wrote: >Hi Steve, > >if you look at the source of build-tag, you will find that the culprit is >compose: > > >> source build-tag >build-tag: func [ > "Generates a tag from a comp

[REBOL] How do I encapsulate a library fn and provide test cases Re:(3)

2000-01-21 Thread jimg
Hi Pekr, At 01:42 PM 1/21/00 +0100, you wrote: >Jim, now system/user/words and system/script/words come to question. Is it >still planned to offer us such separate contexts with some clever functions to >make some words/funcs/objs visible/invisible to another contexts or something >like that? >

[REBOL] How do I encapsulate a library fn and provide test cases Re:

2000-01-21 Thread jimg
At 05:14 AM 1/21/00 +, you wrote: > >in python it is pretty simple >to make a script that can tell if it has >been included in another script. > >when called as a unit on their own, these scripts >simply exercise some regression tests and stop. > >in rebol tho? > > Hi Bob, If system/script/pa

[REBOL] REBOL/View vs. OpenAmulet? Re:(8)

2000-01-20 Thread jimg
> >> REBOL script using the new parse block capability. > >Hi, will this feature make it into /Core too? Having a official way to do >dialecting would be great. Robert > Hi Robert, Yes, /view is built on /core which will be re-released shortly with some improvements and bug fixes. One improvemen

[REBOL] REBOL/View vs. OpenAmulet? Re:(6)

2000-01-20 Thread jimg
At 06:54 AM 1/20/00 -0500, you wrote: >Thanks for your reply, Jim. Much appreciated. > No problem! Something to do between builds... ;-) >On 1/2/2000 at 5:02 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >{ >There is a bonus for those of you who like technical challenges. >REBOL/View will incl

[REBOL] REBOL/View vs. OpenAmulet? Re:(4)

2000-01-20 Thread jimg
At 05:54 AM 1/20/00 -0500, you wrote: >But the source for REBOL/View will be released, hopefully with the >beta, which we are now told will be released Friday. > >Personally, I think it is very important that RT meet the Friday >deadline. It's a beta that will not be closed-source, so if there are

[REBOL] Cursors Re:

2000-01-20 Thread jimg
Hi Phil, It sounds like you have two different versions of REBOL installed in different locations. Check the version number on each and see if they are different. The cursor was changed in 2.2 I think with the new console code. Hope this helps. - jim At 07:22 AM 1/20/00 +, you wrote: >I us

[REBOL] accessing files on other partitions Re:(4)

2000-01-19 Thread jimg
It's just: read %/computer/c/whatever/file.txt The algorithm for WinXX systems assumes that if the root is more than one character it is a network connection. So, don't label your drives with single letters! :-) Hope this helps. - jim At 12:34 AM 1/19/00 -0800, you wrote: >Graham Chiu wrote:

[REBOL] UDP Re:(9)

2000-01-11 Thread jimg
At 07:15 PM 1/10/00 +0200, you wrote: >I've already figured out that. :-) I need a pass-thru port; mainly >I wanted to know how do I recognize if the port was opened with >/lines, or /binary, or... etc. I think I need to know that, >because it's a pass-thru port, don't I? > Hi Gabriele, Yes, the

[REBOL] "logical" value referencing ... Re:(3)

1999-12-14 Thread jimg
At 05:00 PM 12/13/99 -0500, you wrote: >So it is important to remember that the variables point to the nth >element of the series, not to the element itself. > >I agree that it would seem convenient to have something like a pointer >to an element, that moved when it moved (without looking it up ag

[REBOL] RFF: empty? for blocks Re:(4)

1999-12-09 Thread jimg
Hi Larry, This is a bug in FORM that should notice that the length of the block has been changed. I trust that Bo will log it... ;-) - jim At 10:40 AM 12/9/99 -0800, you wrote: >Hi Ted > >You have been raising some interesting questions in recent posts. Adding >another twist: > >>> a: [1 2 3 4

[REBOL] What is an action? Re:(4)

1999-12-09 Thread jimg
Hi Larry, Actions can be thought of as a message sento to an object that responds. The same message can be sent to different objects with each object responding appropriately. For example, telling a number to add another number to itself and telling a date to add a number to itself. Native funct

[REBOL] More syntax/documentation Q's Re:(4)

1999-12-09 Thread jimg
to-string! will convert 100 to a string, while make string! will construct an empty string with allocation for at least 100 elements. - jim At 09:19 PM 12/8/99 -0600, you wrote: >Hello, >On 30-Nov-99, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> 2. y: make string! 100 c

[REBOL] What is an action? Re:(2)

1999-12-09 Thread jimg
Hi Eric, Natives and actions are both C-coded REBOL functions. The difference is that actions are functions that datatypes respond to. Hope that clears things up. - jim At 10:12 AM 12/9/99 +0900, you wrote: > >Larry, > >Actions are a type of "function" (in its broader Rebol sense of any-functi

[REBOL] How are functions in REBOL polymorphic? Re:

1999-12-08 Thread jimg
Hi Keith, You can do this by creating your own port protocol handler for pnm or audiobook in the same way as ftp and http are handled. This is done by creating a port handler object and adding it to the system/schemes block. Try doing a "probe system/schemes/finger" to see an example port handler

[REBOL] (De)Compress function source Re:(3)

1999-11-17 Thread jimg
No, compress returns a binary! series. Which, if printed, is converted to something readable, but if you do a WRITE, it will write the binary data. - jim At 10:04 AM 11/17/99 +0100, you wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tues

[REBOL] Is it possible to obtain IP address of incoming connection? Re:(5)

1999-11-12 Thread jimg
At 07:23 PM 11/12/99 +0100, you wrote: >btw: what does port/port-id means? What is the number good for? Is it id >number >of socket reserved for communication or what? > >Thanks, > >-pekr- Hi Petr, The port-id is the port number being used by the remote host to connect to you. Don't know if

[REBOL] Is it possible to obtain IP address of incoming connection? Re:

1999-11-12 Thread jimg
Hi Petr, Try peeking at port/host and port/port-id using 2.2. You may be pleasantly surprised! ;-) - jim At 01:16 PM 11/12/99 +0100, you wrote: >Hi, > >let's assume following scenario: > >my-rebol-machine: >--- > >listen: open/lines tcp://:8001 >port: first wait listen > >rem

[REBOL] Other undocumented feature .... Re:

1999-11-10 Thread jimg
Hi Petr, port/state is a set of variables used by the internal port handling code. Generally they can be ignored unless you are writing your own port handler in REBOL. - jim At 08:30 PM 11/10/99 +0100, you wrote: >Hi, > >some few days I pointed out some not all that easily visible >refineme

[REBOL] 2.2 released Re:(2)

1999-11-03 Thread jimg
Hi, Can you give a small example of the problem? Nothing like that has shown up in our testing, so it may be something in the way you are using it that we are unaware of. Thanks. - jim At 12:55 PM 11/3/99 +0100, you wrote: >I have massive problems with the new verion. > >read-io from a ope

[REBOL] 2.2 released

1999-11-02 Thread jimg
Some distributions of the released 2.2 have been posted... - jim

[REBOL] Recursion, rebol crash, and variable visibility once again ... Re:

1999-11-02 Thread jimg
Hi Petr, Try the release 2.2 when available. That should work better for you. Your program seemed to work find searching my 12Gig drive - jim At 12:59 PM 11/2/99 +0100, you wrote: >Hi, > >I know it was discussed several times already here, but I would like >someone to clear things a lit

[REBOL] Is this possible? Re:(3)

1999-10-31 Thread jimg
Hi Russ, Yes, if you do a 'source echo' you'll see that it will do a close on the port. Just setting it to none is fine as well. - jim At 09:50 PM 10/31/99 -0500, you wrote: >Hi Jim, > >I tried this out and it works like a charm in my application! But I needed >to enable/disable console cap

[REBOL] Is this possible? Re:

1999-10-31 Thread jimg
At 08:06 AM 10/31/99 -0500, you wrote: >Hi... Hope some REBOL Guru can answer this one: > >What I'd like to do is to set a variable equal to the string that is >normally sent to the console as a result of executing a command or script. >The result can still go to the console if necessary, but I'd

[REBOL] epoch? Re:(8)

1999-10-28 Thread jimg
Hi Petr, Well, it can, just that right now it isn't. ;-) Put in a request for it if you think it's important. - jim Maybe At 09:09 AM 10/29/99 +0200, you wrote: >Hi Jim, > > >->> t: now >->> t/julian >== 302 > >->> now/julian >** Script Error: now has no refinement called julian. >** Where:

[REBOL] Multiple REBOL Re:

1999-10-28 Thread jimg
Hi Philip, There shouldn't be any problem. - jim At 01:50 AM 10/29/99 -0400, you wrote: >Hello, > >Does anyone know if you can run multiple copies of REBOL??? Like two >different listservers? > >Regards, >Philip M. McDonnell

[REBOL] epoch? Re:(6)

1999-10-28 Thread jimg
Hi, Try this: >> t: now/date == 28-Oct-1999 >> t/julian == 301 >> 1-jan-1999 + 300 == 28-Oct-1999 - jim At 09:56 PM 10/28/99 -0700, you wrote: >REBOL *must* be basing dates on a stored Julian day number. They should >give us a word 'julian that returns the julian day no for a given date

[REBOL] Use of - in prefix notation. Re:(4)

1999-10-28 Thread jimg
The error occurs when you mix the two as in: >> + 2 3 + 4 == 10 2.2 gives you: == 9 - jim At 09:30 AM 10/28/99 +0200, you wrote: > >> + + 3 4 5 >== 12 > >> + + + 3 4 5 6 >== 18 > >> + + + + 3 4 5 6 7 >== 25 > >> > >I think its works! > >Mikel > >- Original Message - >From: <[EMAIL

[REBOL] Use of - in prefix notation. Re:(2)

1999-10-27 Thread jimg
Hi Elliott, Yes, this is a bug and has been fixed in 2.2. - jim At 02:43 AM 10/27/99 -0500, you wrote: > >> + 3 4 5 >== 5 > >> + 3 4 + 5 >== 13 > >> + 3 4 + 5 6 >== 6 > >> + 3 4 + 5 + 6 >== 24 > >Confusing. Why does 3+4+5=13, and 3+4+5+6=24? I prefer the standard >algebraic notation anyway,

[REBOL] 'protect function in beta (bug?) Re:(2)

1999-10-26 Thread jimg
Yes, it has been fixed. - jim At 03:04 PM 10/26/99 -0700, you wrote: >Hi Russ, >you wrote: protect 'help >> help: none >>** Script Error: Word help is protected, cannot modify. >>** Where: help: none >> parse "this is a test" [thru " is " copy help to end] >>== true >> prin

[REBOL] Rebol and Linux Re:(2)

1999-10-05 Thread jimg
Hi, Actually, if REBOL_HOME isn't defined, HOME will be used. - jim At 10:39 AM 10/5/99 -0700, you wrote: > Hi Katt: > >> Hi, >> Is anyone using Rebol with a Linux system? If so, can >> you guide me into installing it? >> -- >> Katt > > > Option one: put it in your user bi

[REBOL] CGI-Hit Counter Re:(3)

1999-01-03 Thread jimg
soon - jim At 10:50 PM 11/5/99 -0800, you wrote: >Thanks to Jeff and Joel for the great suggestions on CGI counters. > > > (Of course, with REBOL integrated into your web server, a > >server side include makes this pretty darn easy to accomplish (-: ) > >Okay now you've got my curiosity