I think that is a great feature. Operator precedence always confused me. In Rebol, it
is done
left-right...the way it should have been done in other languages..
rishi
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2000 4:1
objects have access to outer object words? for example, can
>'instancefunc1 access 'function1 as shown above?
>
> I hope this works. If it does, it would be a very simple but elegant solution to my
>problem. It would be even more elegent when modules come around so I can keep al
ep all
private words in context of myobject rather than the actual object returned...making
code very clear.
Rishi
Previously, you ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I am working on a program which requires about 1000 or so instances of objects. It
>doesn't have to be OO but I like the de
I am working on a program which requires about 1000 or so instances of objects. It
doesn't have to be OO but I like the design better that way. I am using a function as
constructor like the following example (not real code..):
;I used dashes to keep formatting intact (hopefully this works)
mak
rebel..) in, say, REBOL/View if it will cost $500 or so.
Guess I just want to have quality fun for a cheap price... Will that be possible? What
does the REBOL future look like for individual, non-profit users?
just wondering...
Rishi
Previously, you ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Let me
REBOLUSERS
REBOL/Users
Or, if you can use brackets in name, try:
[REBOL] ; I kind of like this one. It would also work when you search for the word
"rebol"
blah blah blah...etc...etc...
Rishi
Previously, you ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Rishi wrote:
> > Wasn't there a lis
dates, etc..) are treated as values. Has anyone confirmed this? I know I am not
supposed to snoop around and figure out how this stuff works in REBOL, but it is just
something I have to know...
Rishi
Previously, you ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hello, Rishi!
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wr
nt to
me...but I'm sure reality is that I don't understand what is going on. It seemed to me
that Larry implied that everything in rebol is passed by reference. but does not seem
to be true as shown in above example. I don't know why this is so hard for me to
grasp... It shouldn&#
I would also prefer it on egroups. Wasn't there a list already created by the name
"rebol"? If not, who is going to create it and create/maintain list?
Rishi
Previously, you ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Carl wrote:
> > What would you think if we were to move this
Haven't seen this article mentionedbut it's pretty good.
http://www.sunworld.com/sunworldonline/swol-09-2000/swol-0929-regex.html
Rishi
prove that b references a for number
datatypes?
Rishi
Previously, you ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi Rishi
>
> Well, there are a lot of issues raised by your questions. I am sure you will
> get a number of responses. I will limit myself to a couple of quick
> comments.
>
are passed/copied/attached by reference.
-all deep functions (functions within functions or blocks within functions) are
passed/copied/attached by reference.
-all deep objects (objects within objects or blocks within objects) are
passed/copied/attached by reference.
did I miss anything?
Rishi
time...
Rishi
Previously, you ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Jeff wrote:
> > So let's say you construct a form out of ALL hidden type fields. And you
> want to submit it without the user having to press anything. Meaning you
> want to somehow let the script "Press the Submit but
They used to use lisp...but for some reason switched to c. Some of the examples he was
showing on the board were in lisp...but I guess we are not using it. He had to write
some c libraries to make up for stuff that was built into lisp.
Rishi
Rishi
Previously, you ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
I think you would be happy with qnx rtp. For the first time, I am happy with an OS.
You don't even notice it...it just stays out of the way. My kind of an OS.
Rishi
Previously, you ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Outlook Express did it again: Destroyed my inbox t
don't, some other
language will take hold (such as python).
Also great that rebol manual was just released. Now I plan to study this language in
detail...
Rishi
perimental release or an official release? Hopefully
View will make it before the end of the year.
Rishi
Previously, you ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> http://www.qnx.com/news/pr/sep29_00-dwnl.html
>
> Heh, what a pity > 200k people can't try REBOL/View But, at least, I
> th
ere did you put the files on your
hard disk?
Rishi
Previously, you ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 08:15:09AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >I download rebol/core for qnx rtp and extracted it out. When I try to run
> > >"rebol" from the te
I download rebol/core for qnx rtp and extracted it out. When I try to run "rebol" from
the
terminal...it doesn't work. How do you run rebol in qnx rtp?
rishi
What is Rebol/Shell? Is this an upcoming replacement for command line shells (ie.
bash)? Sounds
really interesting... I would like this...
Rishi
>
>
> > > Well imagine following:
> > >
> > > in pseudo-code:
> > >
> > > ftpcopy rebol to host x
&
Yes, I also hope rebol/view comes to qnx rtp since that is what I now use...
Rishi
Previously, you ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> A very fine OS release. I'm very impressed with it.
>
> Python and Perl are on the CD image, it is a pity REBOL didn't get onto
ssing intensive?
Rishi
> Fixed various bugs. Adds file requestors. Numerous other changes.
>
> Note: face actions created by VID are now functions. This allows
> you to refer to the active face from within the action block. For
> example:
>
>toggle "True" "Fals
ng to qnx rtp. This is shocking to me that
they passed
up this opportunity...especially considering a lot of the people who will initially be
using qnx rtp
are coming from the amiga and beos (like me) crowd...exactly the same type of people
who would use
rebol. What a shame
Rishi
ember
26th...and will be available for free...I'm sure having Rebol/View on it as early as
possible would
be a good thing (before people become hooked on the other languages).
Rishi O.
>
>
> > Below are some old OS market share stats (no doubt
> > Unix flavours have grow
sorry. Have no idea where my mind was when I was writing this. Solved all issues
without server-side
rebol assistance...
Rishi
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2000 11:03 AM
Subject: [REBOL] need c
se any computer in the lab to access my programs
- use any server as my network operating system/diskette.
- use rebol/view browser as my file manager.
Thanks.
Rishi O.
yes. I think rebol should attact educational market before python beats them to it!
give it to
schools/colleges for free!!!
Rishi
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 9:00 AM
Subject: [REBOL] The Industry
oh no! $300 - $500! How about a price for students?!
Rishi
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 6:59 AM
Subject: [REBOL] REBOL Command V 1.0 Release!
> REBOL Technologies is pleased to announc
Most likely QNX Real Time Platform uses unix-style filenames. Not sure thought. It
will be released
on Sep. 26th so I will find out then. Looks like it is going to be a really great
platform.
On a side note, I'm a bit sad that rebol/view and rebol/command are not supported on
qnx rtp.
Especial
>
> > Will REBOL/View eventually support a graphical file-browser?
> >
> > Rishi
> >
> >
>
> Yes it will, request-file. You would have noticed the button for it in
> Requestor Tests in vidtest.r, right?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Allen K
>
Just noticed it. thanks.
rishi
Will REBOL/View eventually support a graphical file-browser?
Rishi
Hi. Since rebol does not have a compiler, I find it a bit more difficult to debug
large rebApps.
Anyone have any debugging tips/strategies? Curious how others debug their scripts...
Rishi
sorry. I didn't realize that view has been updated. In addition, I was pleasantly
surprised to find
beta version of command available. new release solved bug. Now I can get continue on
with my program
...
thanks.
Rishi
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
work fine. But if at any time after the object happens to be in
the same state
as any of those n earlier states, and then you save, this bug will occur and file will
be
corrupted..
Rishi
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, S
about box says:
rebol/view Version 0.10.29.3.1
running on win98SE
I think it is latest view version...
rishi
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2000 2:07 PM
Subject: [REBOL] save bug Re:
> What versio
retreive
this object using
load.
So the basic bug is that if you save the same exact object to a file twice, the second
time it
doesn't work. Notice that if you alter the state of the object (such as set m to
something else),
and then save it, it will be saved correctly.
This bug has been such a pain for me today
Rishi
that's just too simple.
Rishi
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2000 12:36 AM
Subject: [REBOL] serializing? Re:
> Rishi wrote:
> > I've created an object in my source file. I would like
I've created an object in my source file. I would like to save this object to a text
file, and
later, retrieve this object and use it.
This is called serialization of an object. Is there an easy way to do this in rebol?
Rishi O.
is there any other way, besides writing a compiler, to hide source code?
Rishi
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 2:36 AM
Subject: [REBOL] rebol weak points (i think) Re:(7)
> [EMAIL P
In the rebol command line, some expressions display the result following "==" sign
while some don't.
example:
>> 5 + 5
== 10
>> print 5 + 5
10
In general, when the you get "==" sign before the result?
Rishi
erested :
http://www.mwbrooks.com/dvorak/
It works really well with rebol...
(hey, if i was in a dvorak message board or qnx discussion board and the topic of
programming
languages came up...I would definately give REBOL a plug!)
Rishi
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I didn't get that right...oops...probably because I use the dvorak keyboard layout
rather than
qwerty...
Rishi
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 7:27 AM
Subject: [REBOL] Rebol Tech, please answer.
neers know all this stuff...)
Rishi
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 8:42 PM
Subject: [REBOL] Rebol Tech, please answer. Two questions. Re:(4)
> >Here's two of those kinds of questions I
>
for the brackets...[]... well when together, they look like blocks...don't they
take a look below
--[]
-[][]
[][][]
it looks like i stacked blocks on top of each other. My guess is carl chose [ and ]
for blocks
because it looks like a block when put together...
Rishi
- Original Message
mmers!)? With
the programs we are creating at work, I have a hard enough time just dealing with just
one platform
(then again...it's windows...)
Actually, I think they are brilliant and insane. I don't know how they can do it, but
I'm glad they
can!!
Rishi
- Original Message
there a way to read older archives of this newsgroup (like several months/years
old) so I
don't have to post questions that have been answered?
Rishi
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2000 9:27 PM
Subject: [REBOL]
rofit
use. Add support services for this fee.
- charge service based fees for developing custom
dialacts for companies that need it.
This way, there is no marketing reason to
stifle/limit/bloat... the technology...
Just a thought....
Rishi
Rebol technolgies will be
porting rebol/view, rebol/command to qnx real-time-platform?
Rishi
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2000 11:19
AM
Subject: [REBOL] .net Framework
I am to a fan of
why rebol
can't be compiled. Javascript, perl, python, java ... and most all languages
i've seen can all be compiled (to at least byte code)...
thanks
Rishi O.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2000 3:
specification (ECMAScript
Edition 3). With only a few minor exceptions (to maintain backward
compatibility), JScript is a full implementation of the ECMA standard.] So the
.NET platform provides a common language framework, which is a huge benefit to
script writers
...more at url above...
<< end excerpt
here is an article on the c# language:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/0900/csharp/csharp.asp
Rishi
va has packages and stuff...perhaps I
am not thinking straight and have too much java in my blood (which I have
been doing to much of lately and finally got sick of all the abstractions
that got in the way of doing simple stuff!!)
Rishi
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
have to use "Math" before it in order to =access it.Perhaps I
haven't studied the language in enough detail yet, but =wouldn't you all
agree that this is a weakness in rebol? It doesn't seem =that well suited
for modular based programming as is. Maybe I'm missing =something but I
don't see why the author did it this
way...Rishi
iful OS. I can only
hope...
Rishi
Hi. I'm curious who created Rebol. The rebol website claims Carl Sassenrath.
But I've also read that Joe Marschall was the creator of Rebol (at least 1.x
versions).
Rishi
54 matches
Mail list logo
