- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2000 11:28 PM
Subject: [REBOL] REBOL for DOS Re:(4)
> >> >That's the reason I think DOS still fits my needs. What other "simple"
> >> &g
>> >That's the reason I think DOS still fits my needs. What other "simple"
>> >OSes are left? Linux? Not all that easy. Upcoming Neutrino? Standalone
>> >Amiga/Elate? Maybe DOS is ugly OS, but it is lightweight and boots fast.
>> >Still not sure RT will reconsider REBOL DOS release though ...
>>
>
REBOL DOS release though ...
>
>Have you tried BeOS?
>Powerful as Linux, GUI interface, et al.
>Take a test drive :-)
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Subject : [REBOL] REBOL for DOS Re:
> >From : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Reply-To : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date : Thu Apr 13 09:25:07 2000
> --
>
> >But on the other hand - it's al
Subject : [REBOL] REBOL for DOS Re:
>From : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date : Thu Apr 13 09:25:07 2000
--
>But on the other hand - it's also question of simplicity. We don't need
>all that W95 underl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi listers,
>
> What do you think,is there any chance in the future to see a
> Rebol version for (MS/DR/IBM)-DOS ?
> Or the Rebol team just consider DOS meaning Defunct Operating
> System ;-)...
There was some discussion held on the topic here already. DOS is not
Hi listers,
What do you think,is there any chance in the future to see a
Rebol version for (MS/DR/IBM)-DOS ?
Or the Rebol team just consider DOS meaning Defunct Operating
System ;-)...
--
Best regards,
VICTOR mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
