Re: [WSG] The Decline of Print Styles

out of their printer. LOL! I take it, by internal folks you mean faculty types with, as one would expect, an education somewhat beyond a high school diploma. Not much hope for us external folks, then, is there? -- Regards, Gene Falck [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [WSG] Background Image Bullets

, Gene Falck [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***

[WSG] Background Image Bullets

this? Have a cure for it? -- Regards, Gene Falck [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***

RE: [WSG] image border inside

have no idea how good this would be for cross- browser but I have been playing around with the idea of styling links like buttons and it seems to work in IE6, Mozilla 1.7, and a recent Safari that my daughter uses. -- Regards, Gene Falck [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [WSG] Accessibility statement

. I'll be watching for Thierry's answer. Perhaps, as it is written, the statement is intended for use on a page that reserves the H1 for the site name / company logo. -- Regards, Gene Falck [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The discussion list for http

Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect

finally found the information I wanted in a .pdf that I had to magnify to be able to bring the tiny type up out of pixel hell. My impression is that the .net way is not a nice way to go if you want standards-based markup. -- Regards, Gene Falck [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect

finally found the information I wanted in a .pdf that I had to magnify to be able to bring the tiny type up out of pixel hell. My impression is that the .net way is not a nice way to go if you want standards-based markup. -- Regards, Gene Falck [EMAIL PROTECTED