Re: [WSG] page check :: ~dL

David, on Friday, May 5, 2006 at 10:35 wsg@webstandardsgroup.org wrote: > I'd appreciate your comments an suggestions on this > page Very nice! Simple but impressive. Just one minor suggestion: I'd use s set to display: block; instead of the tags

[WSG CMS] CMS Suggestions for Evaluation

Hi! We are looking for a XML based enterprise CMS written in JAVA. Has anybody an idea, which systems are worth evaluating? Open Source is fine, but commercial products are preferred. (Support...) We may take a look at: Apache Lenya (Open Source) EMC Documentum and Vyre Unify.

Re: [WSG CMS] CMS Suggestions for Evaluation

Hi! Thanks for the hints! liferay and alfresco seem to be very promising :-) Martin. * The CMS discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ *

Re: [WSG] LInks Multi-language

Gaspar, on Friday, June 30, 2006 at 10:52 wsg@webstandardsgroup.org wrote: > for me the only mean useful for this page it's teh 3 links > but i thing it's better take retire this page, dont't u thing the > same? Yes, definitly! > My big question it's the in body i will tell what language or in

Re: [WSG] Form check

Dean, on Tuesday, July 18, 2006 at 16:04 you wrote: > The client determined the content of the form. Their purpose was to > *filter out* people who "wouldn't even attempt to fill it in". > As for those concerned about the single page issue, I see that as a > printed page paradigm. I see little c

Re: [WSG] how to create nested links in a side-navigation

Soeren, on Friday, July 21, 2006 at 10:20 wsg@webstandardsgroup.org wrote: > For navigation on the right site I like to use a nested list. > What is the best way to produce a nested list? > Did I do the list below correct? Yes, your list is valid, but I think you intend it a bit different: Depa

Re: [WSG] manditory width required for floated form elements?

Nathan, on Monday, July 24, 2006 at 13:48 wsg@webstandardsgroup.org wrote: > My understanding is that you must declaire a width for floated block level > elements (i.e. div, p, ul etc.) But is this the same for inline elements? > Specificaly, I want to float an input feild and its associated labl

Re: [WSG] Browser stats

Seb, on Tuesday, August 1, 2006 at 15:19 wsg@webstandardsgroup.org wrote: > The only way to get accurate statistics is to gather your own, on each > individual site. Then you're guaranteed a relevant sample. If you look at > statistics of any other site, no matter what they might claim, you're

Re: [WSG] Resetting properties after *

Helmut, Tuesday, August 1, 2006, 7:51:18 PM, you wrote: HG> I set up my css like this: HG> HG> *{ HG> margin: 0px; HG> padding: 0px; HG> } Maybe you should try this approach: http://kurafire.net/log/archive/2005/07/26/starting-css-revisited Ciao, Martin ***

Re: [WSG] XHTML strict image spacing

Paul, on Wednesday, August 2, 2006 at 16:36 wsg@webstandardsgroup.org wrote: > Surprisingly, I can't seem to find any information on this. The > XHTML Strict doctype I am using seems to put a space between images. There is nothing wrong with this behaviour. The img-tag is an inline element. If p

Re: [WSG] Making Semantically Correct Instructions with Images in XHTML

Zachary, >> Right now, the > > instructions are separated into different paragraphs (separate > p> for each), and then for some paragraphs, there is a relevant > > image, included before the paragraph, and when styles are applied, > > the image is left floated in the paragraph. > If the questio

Re: [WSG] image verification

On Wednesday 02 August 2006 17:46, Ted Drake wrote: > A petition isn't going to solve anything. The major internet companies are > already aware of captcha problems. The above solution works great for a > personal site or small business. When you are Craigslist, amazon, yahoo, > etc a more robust t

Re: [WSG] PDF no chance to open in browser !?

Gaspar, on Friday, August 25, 2006 at 16:27 Matthew wrote: > On 8/25/06, Gaspar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> And anyone knows a way of doing that, myme type?! httpconfig?! .htaccess ?? > I think you're out of luck - the configuration of what filetypes the > browser can handle is specific to t

Re: [WSG] Coding Tables

marvin, on Thursday, November 9, 2006 at 04:59 wsg@webstandardsgroup.org wrote: I don't understand your problem well enough to give you a solution, but you should consider the following things: 1. You use two table tags. Put the summary Attribute into the first table tag and drop the second o

Re: [WSG] HR tag and Semantics

Hi! From the HTML 4.01 specs: "The P element represents a paragraph." A paragraph is a division of text that semantically belongs together. "The DIV and SPAN elements, in conjunction with the id and class attributes, offer a generic mechanism for adding structure to documents. Thes

Re: [WSG] semantics : was-[HR tag and Semantics]

Michael, > No, no, no! A DIV is semantically neutral, ie has no meaning > whatsoever. The addition of a class name does not change that. So how > can a pair of DIV's have more meaning than a specific HTML element? Yes a DIV is semantically neutral, but it has a structural meaning. And HR doesn't

Re[2]: [WSG] semantics : was-[HR tag and Semantics]

Mike, Wednesday, February 7, 2007, 3:20:25 PM, you wrote: >> >> Yes a DIV is semantically neutral, but it has a structural meaning. >> And HR doesn't have a semantic meaning either, it's just visual with a >> structural implication. >> mbbc> Would you care to back that up by explaining what 'st

Re: [WSG] layout - choices?

Bob, on Friday, February 23, 2007 at 12:19 wsg@webstandardsgroup.org wrote: > > content > different content > > This can then be CSS'd of course, in the normal way. > The important point though, is that the number of cells in a grid should > be restricted to an agreed number