Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect

Hi all, Just clarify the difference between server side generated PDF to client-side printing to PDF. And I am also explaining this from my experience with ColdFusion, not .Net. With server side generated PDF with Coldfusion, you basically wrap the HTML (static or dynamic) between the to

Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect

Adobe Acrobat has the ability to capture a website as a pdf documentWhen I last used it with Acrobat 4 in about 2001, it's rendering engine then was quite different to other browsers at the time (IE5 and NN4.7). The differences that your client is seeing is probably due to differences in rendering

Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect

Hi Steven, You wrote: I have used Coldfusion MX 7 server to generate PDF of HTML pages. ... I think .net has something similar too. I just came from checking for info on the site of one of our fine commercial enterprises that was, it seems, generated by .net. After not being able to successf

Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect

entire site viewable as pdf But what does that mean exactly? Bruce, making PDF files from a site is done by "printing" it to a PDF writer, so it is dependent on the print style sheet most of the times. -- Jan Brasna :: www.alphanumeric.cz | www.janbrasna.com | www.wdnews.net **

Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect

Hi Bruce, Bruce wrote on 04-06-2006: > I asked about a client recreating a site as a pdf, and having that > expected, the entire site, and if anyone has had that requested as > I have never been asked to have that. Maybe not exactly a match, but I have had problems where a client wanted the

RE: [WSG] Pixel Perfect

-Original Message- From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Sent: Monday, 5 June 2006 7:27 a.m. To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect My apologies, I never asked about it printing, I said the print stylesheet wasnt done

Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect

 Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Quote:"The differences that your client is seeing is probably due to differencesin rendering engine. ie the Adobe engine is not standard compliant." Is great info!!!**I should of written:The differences that your

Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect

Nick Cowie wrote: When I last used it with Acrobat 4 in about 2001, it's rendering engine then was quite different to other browsers at the time >(IE5 and NN4.7). The differences that your client is seeing is probably due to differences in rendering engine. ie the Adobe engine is not >standard

Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect

Adobe Acrobat has the ability to capture a website as a pdf documentWhen I last used it with Acrobat 4 in about 2001, it's rendering engine then was quite different to other browsers at the time (IE5 and NN4.7). The differences that your client is seeing is probably due to differences in rendering

Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect

Hi Steven, You wrote: I have used Coldfusion MX 7 server to generate PDF of HTML pages. ... I think .net has something similar too. I just came from checking for info on the site of one of our fine commercial enterprises that was, it seems, generated by .net. After not being able to successf

Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect

Hi Bruce, Bruce wrote on 04-06-2006: > I asked about a client recreating a site as a pdf, and having that > expected, the entire site, and if anyone has had that requested as > I have never been asked to have that. Maybe not exactly a match, but I have had problems where a client wanted the

Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect

Bruce,I haven't been asked this before - not in 10 years. Typically there's a requirement for a particular page(s) to be able to be saved as a PDF, but for that we provide dedicated & specific functionality - using a server-side PDF generator. It's a reasonable request, though, and could be achieve

Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect

>site viewable as pdf and have it look perfect: > >Thanks >bruce Prochnau > >- Original Message - >From: "David Dixon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: >Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2006 3:04 PM >Subject: Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect > > >> Im ju

Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect

entire site viewable as pdf But what does that mean exactly? Bruce, making PDF files from a site is done by "printing" it to a PDF writer, so it is dependent on the print style sheet most of the times. -- Jan Brasna :: www.alphanumeric.cz | www.janbrasna.com | www.wdnews.net **

Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect

avid Dixon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2006 3:04 PM Subject: Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect Im just going to echo what Bob said. Your site will not print properly because a) your site is "fixed width" and is not designed to scale with smaller display areas (su

Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect

quot;David Dixon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2006 3:04 PM Subject: Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect Im just going to echo what Bob said. Your site will not print properly because a) your site is "fixed width" and is not designed to scale with smaller display are

Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect

Im just going to echo what Bob said. Your site will not print properly because a) your site is "fixed width" and is not designed to scale with smaller display areas (such as the translated size of A4 paper), and b) you do not have any style sheet that applies to printed pages, so that the fixed

Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect

icles, not the entire page lol. Appreciate the font tip, hadn't noticed and will fix. I have no idea what she used to make site pdf, asked her... Bruce Prochnau bkdesign - Original Message - From: "Designer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2006 2:37

Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect

Bruce wrote: Yes, it isn't perfect or done yet but is in process: http://66.118.191.85/~websterk/index.php Thanks Bruce Prochnau When I print to acrobat distiller, the pdf is nothing like the web site! I wouldn't expect it to be actually, unless I'd provided a print style sheet. Did I mis

Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect

Matteo wrote: Can we take a look to this site? Yes, it isn't perfect or done yet but is in process: http://66.118.191.85/~websterk/index.php Thanks Bruce Prochnau 1802" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2006 1:59 PM Subject: Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect >The

Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect

yeah a URL would be great :D On 6/4/06, 1802 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >The site is 100% error free in both code and css according to the >w3c validator, no errors, no warnings on css. >Has anyone ran into this? I have the tendency to tell the client to >shop elsewhere Can we take a look t

Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect

On 6/4/06, Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all, I ran into something todat from a client I have never seen here or elsewhere. A client claiming there must be code errors because in making a pdf file of the site there are a couple of images out a few pixels, one considerably. Says clients

Re: [WSG] Pixel Perfect

The site is 100% error free in both code and css according to the w3c validator, no errors, no warnings on css. Has anyone ran into this? I have the tendency to tell the client to shop elsewhere Can we take a look to this site? -- Matteo Discardi 1802 http://homepage.mac.com/matteo.discard

[WSG] Pixel Perfect

Hi all,   I ran into something todat from a client I have never seen here or elsewhere.   A client claiming there must be code errors because in making a pdf file of the site there are a couple of images out a few pixels, one considerably. Says clients need to be able to make nice copies of t