, 2006 10:35 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Accessible Multi-Column List
At 10/26/2006 01:44 AM, Sarah Peeke (XERT) wrote:
Basically I need to show a list of links in two columns, alphabetical
vertically (one column will not suffice as the list is too long
This solution would be great, except that I need the list to remain
alphabetical *vertically*.
Have you considered styling your LIs so that they sit side-by-side
within the list? Then you would have one single list, with list items
taking up 49% of the width of the list, giving the appearance
Hi Paul
The methods I describe in this article use ems for positioning, not
pixels:
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/multicolumnlists/
My favorite method is the last (#6). Have you found that it doesn't
survive cross-browser? I'd be interested in your findings.
I saw your example 6,
Thanks Paul,
A great read of the options for multi column lists.
You have helped another activist and cat lover trying to give up using
Tables.
Thanks
Tim
On 26/10/2006, at 7:34 PM, Paul Novitski wrote:
At 10/26/2006 01:44 AM, Sarah Peeke (XERT) wrote:
Basically I need to show a list of
On Oct 26, 2006, at 7:26 PM, Sarah Peeke (XERT) wrote:
The methods I describe in this article use ems for positioning, not
pixels:
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/multicolumnlists/
My favorite method is the last (#6). Have you found that it doesn't
survive cross-browser? I'd be interested
At 10/26/2006 05:58 AM, Mike at Green-Beast.com wrote:
Not sure if this one's messed up on various platforms/browsers but I think
it's stable. It might yet another option for you. It's good and resizes well
in everything *I've* tested it in (including IE7). The ordering is left -
right - down,
: [WSG] Accessible Multi-Column List
At 10/26/2006 05:58 AM, Mike at Green-Beast.com wrote:
Not sure if this one's messed up on various platforms/browsers but I think
it's stable. It might yet another option for you. It's good and resizes
well
in everything *I've* tested it in (including IE7
At 10/26/2006 11:54 AM, Mike at Green-Beast.com wrote:
Thanks for the feedback. I did note it was left - right - down so it was
more or less just an option for if wanting a presentational list in that
format (not sure if it's wrong or fractured per se).
Sure -- perhaps I shouldn't have used
Paul Novitski wrote:
If you haven't already, please read my List Apart article
http://alistapart.com/articles/multicolumnlists/. I'd love it if
you could improve on any of those techniques or come up with ones I
hadn't considered.
Hi Paul,
What about this one?: http://www.tjkdesign.com/test/
, October 26, 2006 4:07 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Accessible Multi-Column List
At 10/26/2006 11:54 AM, Mike at Green-Beast.com wrote:
Thanks for the feedback. I did note it was left - right - down so it was
more or less just an option for if wanting a presentational list in that
format (not sure if it's
At 10/26/2006 04:06 PM, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
Paul Novitski wrote:
If you haven't already, please read my List Apart article
http://alistapart.com/articles/multicolumnlists/. I'd love it if
you could improve on any of those techniques or come up with ones I
hadn't considered.
Hi Paul,
http://www.christianmontoya.com/2006/09/18/revisiting-image-rollovers/
If you're talking about the Ryan Rollovers that you link to, it looks very
similar to the Gilder-Levin method which is mentioned at
http://www.mezzoblue.com/tests/revised-image-replacement/ (dated 2004) and
was updated
On 10/26/06, John Faulds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.christianmontoya.com/2006/09/18/revisiting-image-rollovers/
If you're talking about the Ryan Rollovers that you link to, it looks very
similar to the Gilder-Levin method which is mentioned at
Lol, MIR is taken... I did not know.
Mike
- Original Message -
From: Christian Montoya [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 7:54 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Accessible Multi-Column List
On 10/26/06, Mike at Green-Beast.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
14 matches
Mail list logo
