RE: [OzMOSS] RE: 64-bit versus 32-bit for MOSS Environments

2008-09-11 Thread Witherdin, Nigel
User error, as usual! Thanks Ishai - now working fine Nigel Witherdin From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Ishai Sagi Sent: Wed 10/09/2008 23:59 To: listserver@ozMOSS.com Subject: RE: [OzMOSS] RE: 64-bit versus 32-bit for MOSS Environments Woops. I

RE: [OzMOSS] RE: 64-bit versus 32-bit for MOSS Environments

2008-09-10 Thread Ishai Sagi
To: listserver@ozMOSS.com Subject: RE: [OzMOSS] RE: 64-bit versus 32-bit for MOSS Environments I'd argue that you really shouldn't make the decision based on the VSeWSS support. Really, VSeWSS in its current version just plain sucks. I don't recommend using it. The next version may improve, and those

RE: [OzMOSS] RE: 64-bit versus 32-bit for MOSS Environments

2008-09-10 Thread Jeremy Thake
1:57 PM To: listserver@ozMOSS.com Subject: RE: [OzMOSS] RE: 64-bit versus 32-bit for MOSS Environments are you talking about the solution generator (which comes with the VseWSS, but is not part of the extensions) or are you talking about creating a list definition project? For a list definition

RE: [OzMOSS] RE: 64-bit versus 32-bit for MOSS Environments

2008-09-10 Thread Ishai Sagi
Subject: RE: [OzMOSS] RE: 64-bit versus 32-bit for MOSS Environments I've just found it easier building the list and adding the content types, views, workflows and general configuration (versioning etc.) and then reverse engineering it usimg the Solution Generator. Found the schema.xml code very

RE: [OzMOSS] RE: 64-bit versus 32-bit for MOSS Environments

2008-09-10 Thread Jeremy Thake
:02 PM To: listserver@ozMOSS.com Subject: RE: [OzMOSS] RE: 64-bit versus 32-bit for MOSS Environments I've just found it easier building the list and adding the content types, views, workflows and general configuration (versioning etc.) and then reverse engineering it usimg the Solution Generator

RE: [OzMOSS] RE: 64-bit versus 32-bit for MOSS Environments

2008-09-10 Thread Ishai Sagi
@ozMOSS.com Subject: RE: [OzMOSS] RE: 64-bit versus 32-bit for MOSS Environments Ok - still not a reason to use 64bit. The solution generator can work on 64bit machines. Just don't use the extensions. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeremy

RE: [OzMOSS] RE: 64-bit versus 32-bit for MOSS Environments

2008-09-10 Thread Sezai KOMUR
.com.au/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ishai Sagi Sent: Wednesday, 10 September 2008 3:52 PM To: listserver@ozMOSS.com Subject: RE: [OzMOSS] RE: 64-bit versus 32-bit for MOSS Environments Just for you: http://www.sharepoint-tips.com/2008/09

RE: [OzMOSS] RE: 64-bit versus 32-bit for MOSS Environments

2008-09-10 Thread Witherdin, Nigel
Subject: RE: [OzMOSS] RE: 64-bit versus 32-bit for MOSS Environments Just for you: http://www.sharepoint-tips.com/2008/09/how-to-use-microsoft-solution-generator.html -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeremy Thake Sent: Wednesday, 10 September

RE: [OzMOSS] RE: 64-bit versus 32-bit for MOSS Environments

2008-09-10 Thread Ishai Sagi
, and I will try and let you know. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Witherdin, Nigel Sent: Wednesday, 10 September 2008 11:53 PM To: listserver@ozMOSS.com Subject: RE: [OzMOSS] RE: 64-bit versus 32-bit for MOSS Environments Hey Ishai, I

RE: [OzMOSS] RE: 64-bit versus 32-bit for MOSS Environments

2008-09-09 Thread Crabbe, David
Thanks Sezai - good to know that it's not a deal-breaker. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sezai KOMUR Sent: Wednesday, 10 September 2008 11:08 AM To: listserver@ozMOSS.com Subject: [OzMOSS] RE: 64-bit versus 32-bit for MOSS

RE: [OzMOSS] RE: 64-bit versus 32-bit for MOSS Environments

2008-09-09 Thread Jeremy Thake
Subject: RE: [OzMOSS] RE: 64-bit versus 32-bit for MOSS Environments I'd argue that you really shouldn't make the decision based on the VSeWSS support. Really, VSeWSS in its current version just plain sucks. I don't recommend using it. The next version may improve, and those improvements may well