Re: [LMMS-devel] CSS & palette...

Making some progress with this, but there are still some problems unsolved... -- Put Bad Developers to Shame Dominate Development with Jenkins Continuous Integration Continuously Automate Build, Test & Deployment Start

Re: [LMMS-devel] Building LMMS for OSX

> > Tres maybe we should drop wine for mac and create a crossover (mac > equivalent which is based off wine) wrapper. That is how FL does it with > their software it somehow creates and bundles a crossoverwrapper to get > that working. and In the tutoral video alot of the vst's worked except for >

Re: [LMMS-devel] Building LMMS for OSX

IRC has its ups and downs. Tres maybe we should drop wine for mac and create a crossover (mac equivalent which is based off wine) wrapper. That is how FL does it with their software it somehow creates and bundles a crossoverwrapper to get that working. and In the tutoral video alot of the vst's wo

Re: [LMMS-devel] Building LMMS for OSX

I found this article which suggests Apple intentionally dropped the win32 stuff from llvm 5.1: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/cocotron-dev/yUz5uAlVb4Q/2r4VAPiAoSYJ True? No idea. I have gcc-apple-4.2 available via MacPorts, but winegcc is a wrapper around clang 5.1, so I can't seem to ge

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS in portuguese language (?)

Thanks! Your work is greatly appreciated sir!! On 04/10/2014 11:32 PM, Esteban Viveros wrote: Well it's done! Brazilian portuguese translation of LMMS. 2014-04-09 1:15 GMT-03:00 Tres Finocchiaro >: On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Esteban Viveros

Re: [LMMS-devel] Windows xp support

That had not occured to me :) I think this is a very good compromise. On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:54 PM, David Gerard wrote: > On 10 April 2014 21:56, Vesa wrote: > > > Again, this is mostly academic speculation, as it's not all that likely > > that we're going to run into any issues very soon

Re: [LMMS-devel] Windows xp support

On 10 April 2014 21:56, Vesa wrote: > Again, this is mostly academic speculation, as it's not all that likely > that we're going to run into any issues very soon that prevent us from > supporting XP. (Although in the long term, that becomes increasingly > more likely.) But personally, if I tomorr

Re: [LMMS-devel] Windows xp support

On 04/11/2014 12:39 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > To continue supporting XP even though its been shelved by microsoft > But we don't even really have any kind of official "supported platforms" list (that I know of). LMMS just runs on your system or doesn't... what decision is there to make?

Re: [LMMS-devel] Windows xp support

To continue supporting XP even though its been shelved by microsoft On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Vesa wrote: > On 04/11/2014 12:01 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > > I think Toby has to take this decision. > > > > What decision? > -- Jonathan Aquilina

Re: [LMMS-devel] Windows xp support

On 04/11/2014 12:01 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > I think Toby has to take this decision. > What decision? -- Put Bad Developers to Shame Dominate Development with Jenkins Continuous Integration Continuously Automate Bui

Re: [LMMS-devel] Windows xp support

I think Toby has to take this decision. On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Vesa wrote: > On 04/10/2014 04:54 PM, Bill Y. wrote: > > IMO telling a person they should switch to Linux because it is Free > > has not bearing on the issue. There are a plethora of reasons why an > > individual may want

Re: [LMMS-devel] Windows xp support

On 04/10/2014 04:54 PM, Bill Y. wrote: > IMO telling a person they should switch to Linux because it is Free > has not bearing on the issue. There are a plethora of reasons why an > individual may want to stick with XP despite it's EOL this past > Tuesday, and while I agree they are taking security

Re: [LMMS-devel] Do we have too many synths?

I would say no, at least on Linux, because no external plugins are supported unless you want to use VSTs. But I would say we have a shortage of effect plugins. Or add LV2. Louigi. On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:53 PM, musikbear wrote: > If existing synths are merged -what about backward-campatilit

Re: [LMMS-devel] Building LMMS for OSX

First, thanks again for all this help. > ...as expected. Try to somehow link the LMMS binary > ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lmms to the shared library. > Ok, I'll try that, but the function names on the errors seem to suggest RemoteVstPlugin rather than LMMS or am I wrong? (see output here: https://gist.g

Re: [LMMS-devel] Windows xp support

+1 On 10 Apr 2014 15:54, "Bill Y." wrote: > IMO telling a person they should switch to Linux because it is Free has > not bearing on the issue. There are a plethora of reasons why an individual > may want to stick with XP despite it's EOL this past Tuesday, and while I > agree they are taking sec

Re: [LMMS-devel] Windows xp support

IMO telling a person they should switch to Linux because it is Free has not bearing on the issue. There are a plethora of reasons why an individual may want to stick with XP despite it's EOL this past Tuesday, and while I agree they are taking security risks the longer they use it, I've been to pla

Re: [LMMS-devel] Windows xp support

IMHO it would be up to the user if they want to use it, but i think the ultimate question is should we fix xp specific bugs? On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Israel wrote: > @Tres... yes it is not good to replace OS for one app, but > XP is now in open season for exploits. people have been

Re: [LMMS-devel] Windows xp support

@Tres... yes it is not good to replace OS for one app, but XP is now in open season for exploits. people have been working hard, holding back exploits waiting for the day when XP would be free to abuse. It is not good to encourage anyone to use a vulnerable OS, especially when there are Libre

Re: [LMMS-devel] Windows xp support

On 04/10/2014 02:15 PM, musikbear wrote: > topic should focus the issue - XP + lmms > There are still alot of users on xp. *sigh +blush* ygtp.. > Firstly 1.0 runs on xp as a wet /dream/ > Not just run- it gallops! U. Bolt is envious.. > It is totally possible to run /several/ instances of lmms /si

Re: [LMMS-devel] So...

> peeps dl wheelbarrows of VSTs on almost dayly basis +1, and sorry in advance for a touch of trolling: http://i.imgur.com/DonF6Bk.gif -- Put Bad Developers to Shame Dominate Development with Jenkins Continuous Integratio

Re: [LMMS-devel] Windows xp support

@MusikBear, Thanks for testing this. That is exactly what we need in order to offer support. I am sure there are many on this list that can indicate numerous distros > that would be better to use. As MusicBear mentioned, this is a bit off-topic. Although it's pragmatic to recommend a FOSS *n

Re: [LMMS-devel] Windows xp support

Poor peeps can use Lubuntu, or any of the multitudes of great Free and Libre OS, that way they can use LMMS, and avoid the problems of having a completely insecure OS that will now not be recieving any security updates. I am sure there are many on this list that can indicate numerous distros tha

Re: [LMMS-devel] Do we have too many synths?

If existing synths are merged -what about backward-campatility? Would that be preserved withtout further work or only simple ajustments needed, or would it be a serious issue? Lmms is a wonderfull DAV, but the musclework should not be aimed at creating issues. Design-wise, only one of diiz argumen

Re: [LMMS-devel] So...

I support diiz 100% and i would love to see new native synths inside the the lmms factory install. The new synth looks to have interesting features, and i vote for them. Also its very kind of diiz to build these and present them to us. Thank You! On 'Too many' -ehhr?! peeps dl wheelbarrows of VSTs

Re: [LMMS-devel] Windows xp support

topic should focus the issue - XP + lmms There are still alot of users on xp. *sigh +blush* ygtp.. Firstly 1.0 runs on xp as a wet /dream/ Not just run- it gallops! U. Bolt is envious.. It is totally possible to run /several/ instances of lmms /simultanous/ -not just run, but actively playback and

Re: [LMMS-devel] Building LMMS for OSX

Hi, 2014-04-10 6:31 GMT+02:00 Tres Finocchiaro : > Ok, so that helped, but failed on "Linking CXX shared library > libVstBase.dylib". > > For fun, I told the compiler to suppress undefined functions and it > proceeded and built, but launchign LMMS there was no Vestige plugin. ...as expected. Try