[lng-odp] can't configure ODP with DPDK pktio using DPDK package in Ubutnu

Hi, I see that newer ubuntu has an updated version of DPDK. How can I build/run ODP with this DPDK in ubuntu? For me it fails at configure step. *Steps:* 1)Install dpdk-dev, libdpdk-dev, dpdk 2) ./configure --prefix=/root/odp/build --with-dpdk-path=/usr/share/dpdk/arm64-armv8a-linuxapp-gcc/ *I

[lng-odp] packet pool create failed on odp-thunder

Hi, I am trying to run the pktgen example on odp-thunderx. It worked for a couple of times. After that it keeps on failing with error as below. This persists across reboot. I am running this over Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS" root@cavium:~/odp-thunderx/build/bin# ./pktgen -I vfio:30 -m r ODP system info

Re: [lng-odp] ODP crash at buffer_alloc_multi() while inserting into iplookuptable

gt;> >>> I have no idea if it's your case or not. Probably not because you have >>> buffer_alloc_multi in stack trace and I do not see that. >>> >>> You can test this patch: >>> https://github.com/Linaro/odp/pull/700 >>> >>> Maxim. &g

Re: [lng-odp] odp with dpdk pktio gives error with larger packets - 'Segmented buffers not supported'

Hi Matias, This PR 731 fixed the issue. Thanks a lot. Regards, P Gyanesh Kumar Patra On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 4:40 AM Elo, Matias (Nokia - FI/Espoo) < matias@nokia.com> wrote: > Thanks! I think I figured out the problem. Some DPDK NICs require that the > buffer length is at least 2kB +

Re: [lng-odp] odp with dpdk pktio gives error with larger packets - 'Segmented buffers not supported'

mple: ./test/performance/odp_l2fwd > > Best Regards, > Maxim. > > > On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 at 20:49, gyanesh patra > wrote: > >> Hi, >> I am facing problem while using ODP master branch with DPDK pktio & >> zero-pkt-copy as below: >> >> ODP/bin

[lng-odp] odp with dpdk pktio gives error with larger packets - 'Segmented buffers not supported'

Hi, I am facing problem while using ODP master branch with DPDK pktio & zero-pkt-copy as below: ODP/bin/# ./odp_l2fwd_simple ./odp_l2fwd_simple pktio/dpdk.c:851:mbuf_to_pkt_zero():Segmented buffers not supported pktio/dpdk.c:851:mbuf_to_pkt_zero():Segmented buffers not supported

[lng-odp] ODP crash at buffer_alloc_multi() while inserting into iplookuptable

Hi, ODP is crashing at buffer_alloc_multi() while inserting into iplookuptable. The backtrace is as below: (gdb) bt #0 buffer_alloc_multi (pool=0x7fffd5420c00, buf_hdr=buf_hdr@entry=0x7fff55fa8bb0, max_num=max_num@entry=1) at odp_pool.c:700 #1 0x00433083 in odp_buffer_alloc

Re: [lng-odp] Suspected SPAM - Re: latency calulation with netmap pkt i/o fails with oversized packet debug msg

Thanks, I'll check it out. P Gyanesh Kumar Patra On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 4:45 AM Elo, Matias (Nokia - FI/Espoo) < matias@nokia.com> wrote: > > >> On 26 Jul 2018, at 21:24, gyanesh patra > wrote: > >> > >> I verified the throughput over t

Re: [lng-odp] latency calulation with netmap pkt i/o fails with oversized packet debug msg

message from the netmap.c file? Does it serve any purpose? Regards, Gyanesh On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 11:25 AM Maxim Uvarov wrote: > > > On 26 July 2018 at 16:01, gyanesh patra wrote: > >> Hi, >> Here is the output for the debug messages as advised: >> For this c

Re: [lng-odp] latency calulation with netmap pkt i/o fails with oversized packet debug msg

Hi, Here is the output for the debug messages as advised: For this code: -- 541 ODP_DBG("MTU: %" PRIu32 "\n", mtu); 542 ODP_DBG("NM buf_size: %" PRIu32 "\n", buf_size); 543 pkt_nm->mtu = (mtu < buf_size) ? mtu : buf_size; Output: - netmap interface:

[lng-odp] latency calulation with netmap pkt i/o fails with oversized packet debug msg

I am trying to run moongen to calculate the latency in the link. I compiled ODP with netmap. I run example/l2-load-latency.lua from moongen and odp_l2fwd_simple from ODP. I found that most of the packets are dropped at the rx side of ODP. ODP-- root@test:~/gyn/odp/buildN/bin#

Re: [lng-odp] ODP logo to use in academic publications

Thanks a lot for the pointer. Regards, P Gyanesh Kumar Patra On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 9:51 AM Maxim Uvarov wrote: > main odp project has: > ./doc/images/ODP-Logo-HQ.svg > > I think it should be possible to convert it to eps. > > Maxim. > > On 25 July 2018 at 15:

[lng-odp] ODP logo to use in academic publications

​ Hi, I am looking for the ODP Logo in eps format to use in academic publications. I have only encountered png files. Is there any goto location where i can find the logo? Thanks, P Gyanesh Kumar Patra

Re: [lng-odp] Bug 3657

rformance impact. > > -Matias > > > On 12 Apr 2018, at 15:55, gyanesh patra <pgyanesh.pa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > I tried this trick and it worked on the odp-dpdk repository. > > > > What will be the preferred method? > > - ODP_PKTIO_DPDK_

Re: [lng-odp] Suspected SPAM - Re: Bug 3657

cmd_len = snprintf(full_cmd, cmd_len, "odpdpdk -c %s -m %d,%d %s", > + mask_str, DPDK_MEMORY_MB, DPDK_MEMORY_MB, > cmdline); > > for (i = 0, dpdk_argc = 1; i < cmd_len; ++i) { > if (isspace(full_cmd[i])) > > > -Ma

Re: [lng-odp] Bug 3657

/* first argument is facility log, simply bind it to odpdpdk for > now.*/ > >> - cmd_len = snprintf(full_cmd, cmd_len, "odpdpdk -c %s -m %d %s", > >> - mask_str, DPDK_MEMORY_MB, cmdline); > >> + cmd_len = snprintf(f

Re: [lng-odp] Bug 3657

> Hi, > > Have you tested the latest odp-dpdk code? It uses different shm > implementation, so at least we could rule that one out. > > -Matias > > > > On 10 Apr 2018, at 21:37, gyanesh patra <pgyanesh.pa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi Matias,

Re: [lng-odp] Suspected SPAM - Re: Bug 3657

ke a > memory related issue. > > > > -Matias > > > > > >> On 28 Mar 2018, at 18:15, gyanesh patra <pgyanesh.pa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> Yes, it is. > >> The error is the same. I did replied that the only difference

Re: [lng-odp] Bug 3657

OR("%p: unable to allocate queue index %u", >(void *)dev, idx); >priv_unlock(priv); > return -ENOMEM; > } > } > > The reported -12 error code is -ENOMEM so I'd say the issue is some >

Re: [lng-odp] Bug 3657

Hi Bill, I tried with Matias' suggestions but without success. P Gyanesh Kumar Patra On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 4:16 PM, Bill Fischofer wrote: > Hi Gyanesh, > > Have you had a chance to look at https://bugs.linaro.org/ > show_bug.cgi?id=3657 and see if Matias'

Re: [lng-odp] lng-odp Digest, Vol 48, Issue 37

Hi Matias, Thanks for the patch to compile ODP with MLX drivers. Finally, i got to try out the patch, but it is not working for me. I am still getting the same error while running 'test/performance/odp_l2fwd'. My configuration details are : Driver: MLNX_OFED_LINUX-4.2-1.0.0.0 (OFED-4.2-1.0.0)

Re: [lng-odp] issues with usage of mellanox 100G NICs with ODP & ODP-DPDK

pthread. (pid=43825) [02] num pktios 1, PKTIN_DIRECT, PKTOUT_DIRECT pktio/dpdk.c:1538:dpdk_start():Queue setup failed: err=-12, port=0 odp_l2fwd.c:1671:main():Error: unable to start 0 ubuntu@ubuntu:/home/gyanesh/odp/test/performance# If any other logs or details are required, then i would surely provi

Re: [lng-odp] unexpected packet handling behavior with dpdk pktio support

Is it possible to fix for netmap too in similar fashion? P Gyanesh Kumar Patra On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 1:19 PM, Elo, Matias (Nokia - FI/Espoo) < matias@nokia.com> wrote: > The PR is now available: https://github.com/Linaro/odp/pull/458 > > -Matias > > > On 7 Feb 2018,

Re: [lng-odp] unexpected packet handling behavior with dpdk pktio support

rte_eth_dev_socket_id(port_ >> id), >> -NULL, pkt_dpdk->pkt_pool); >> +rxconf, pkt_dpdk->pkt_pool); >> if (ret < 0) { >> OD

Re: [lng-odp] unexpected packet handling behavior with dpdk pktio support

> > > > On 7 Feb 2018, at 11:14, gyanesh patra <pgyanesh.pa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Thanks for the info. I verified this with both odp 1.16 and odp 1.17 > with same behavior. > > The traffic consists of diff Mac and ip addresses. > > Without the busy l

Re: [lng-odp] unexpected packet handling behavior with dpdk pktio support

t; identical they will all end up in the same input queue, which would explain > what you are seeing. > > -Matias > > > > On 6 Feb 2018, at 19:00, gyanesh patra <pgyanesh.pa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > I tried with netmap, dpdk and dpdk with ze

Re: [lng-odp] unexpected packet handling behavior with dpdk pktio support

sing for the tests ? > > Regards > Ilias > > On 6 February 2018 at 19:00, gyanesh patra <pgyanesh.pa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi, > > I tried with netmap, dpdk and dpdk with zero-copy enabled. All of them > have > > the same behaviour. I also tried with (

Re: [lng-odp] unexpected packet handling behavior with dpdk pktio support

9:55 AM, Elo, Matias (Nokia - FI/Espoo) < matias@nokia.com> wrote: > > > > On 5 Feb 2018, at 19:42, Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org> > wrote: > > > > Thanks, Gyanesh, that does sound like a bug. +cc Matias: Can you comment > on this? >

Re: [lng-odp] unexpected packet handling behavior with dpdk pktio support

wrote: > >>> > >>> Thanks, Gyanesh, that does sound like a bug. +cc Matias: Can you > comment on this? > >>> > >>> On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 5:09 AM, gyanesh patra < > pgyanesh.pa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> I am testing an l2fw

[lng-odp] unexpected packet handling behavior with dpdk pktio support

Regards, Gyanesh Patra PhD Candidate Unicamp University

[lng-odp] Compilation flags for release build and performance evaluation

Hi, I am curious if there are any specific flags available for ODP for release builds or performance evaluation? Also where can i find the list of features i can disable by passing to configure scripts? I found couple of options in odp-thunderx project such as "-DODP_DISABLE_CLASSIFICATION and

[lng-odp] ODP always falls back to normal pages instead of using hugepages

Hi, I have noticed that ODP application always check for hugepages and fails though hugepage is configured in the system. And it runs normally using normal pages. I am not sure it affects the performance or not. But if it does, how can i make sure that ODP application uses the hugepages??? I am

Re: [lng-odp] issues with usage of mellanox 100G NICs with ODP & ODP-DPDK

p linux-generic. The > main difference is configure script. With linux-generic you use > '--with-dpdk-path=' option and optionally > --enable-dpdk-zero-copy flag. The supported dpdk version is v17.08. > > > > -Matias > > > >> On 9 Nov 2017, at 10:34, gyanesh pa

Re: [lng-odp] issues with usage of mellanox 100G NICs with ODP & ODP-DPDK

Hi Gyanesh, >> > >> > Pretty much the same steps should also work with odp linux-generic. The >> main difference is configure script. With linux-generic you use >> '--with-dpdk-path=' option and optionally >> --enable-dpdk-zero-copy flag. The supported dpdk

Re: [lng-odp] issues with usage of mellanox 100G NICs with ODP & ODP-DPDK

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 7:56 PM, Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uva...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 11/08/17 19:32, gyanesh patra wrote: > > I am not sure what you mean. Can you please elaborate? > > > > As i mentioned before I am able to run dpdk examples. Hence the drivers > > are a

Re: [lng-odp] issues with usage of mellanox 100G NICs with ODP & ODP-DPDK

wd example too?? P Gyanesh Kumar Patra On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 7:56 PM, Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uva...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 11/08/17 19:32, gyanesh patra wrote: > > I am not sure what you mean. Can you please elaborate? > > > > As i mentioned before I am able to

Re: [lng-odp] issues with usage of mellanox 100G NICs with ODP & ODP-DPDK

iling dpdk too. Is there anything i am missing? P Gyanesh Kumar Patra On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uva...@linaro.org> wrote: > is Mellanox pmd compiled in? > > Maxim. > > On 11/08/17 17:58, gyanesh patra wrote: > > Hi, > > I am tryi

[lng-odp] issues with usage of mellanox 100G NICs with ODP & ODP-DPDK

Hi, I am trying to run ODP & ODP-DPDK examples on our server with mellanox 100G NICs. I am using the odp_l2fwd example. While running the example, I am facing some issues. -> When I run "ODP" example using the if names given by kernel as arguments, I am not getting enough throughput.(the value is

Re: [lng-odp] ODP install error with dpdk 16.07

Thanks, with this configuration it is working. My doubt here is: Why we are not using shared lib, and abi-compat ?? P Gyanesh Patra On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 at 05:37 Elo Matias (Nokia - FI/Espoo) < mailto:Elo Matias (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <matias@nokia-bell-labs.com> > wrote: a, pre,

Re: [lng-odp] odp-dpdk gives error with "configure" command

Thank you. It works fine now. P Gyanesh Patra On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 at 05:54 Elo Matias (Nokia - FI/Espoo) < mailto:Elo Matias (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <matias@nokia-bell-labs.com> > wrote: a, pre, code, a:link, body { word-wrap: break-word !important; } > On 28 Jan 2017, at 23:38

[lng-odp] odp-dpdk gives error with "configure" command

... no configure: error: in `/home/macsad/pktio/odp-dpdk': configure: error: "can't find DPDK headers" See `config.log' for more details macsad@india:~/pktio/odp-dpdk$  P Gyanesh Patra

[lng-odp] ODP install error with dpdk 16.07

]: Leaving directory 'odp/test' Makefile:497: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 I have tried with ODP master branch with DPDK 17 and DPDK 16.07 . I am facing the same problem. This is the ODP repo, not the odp-dpdk repo. P Gyanesh Patra

Re: [lng-odp] ODP installation issues on Cavium ThunderX

There is no link available for the "Cavium implementation" by Support Account on the ODP download page. How can i have access to the code and also corresponding toolchain if needed? P Gyanesh Patra On Thu, 19 Jan 2017 at 14:33 Mike Holmes < mailto:Mike Holmes <mike.hol...@lin

[lng-odp] ODP installation issues on Cavium ThunderX

prerequisites details? I am using the latest master branch of ODP. >>> lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description: Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS Release: 16.04 Codename: xenial >>> gcc --version gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.4) 5.4.0 20160609 Thanks, P Gyanesh Patra

[lng-odp] query regarding cuckoo hash table support

Hi, I am unable to find the cuckoo hash files in the recent code base. Is the feature is removed from ODP code base or renamed to something else? Thank you Gyanesh

Re: [lng-odp] LPM Algorithm APIs in ODP

gress of releasing the LPM code, but currently we are > busy submitting the cuckoo hash code into ODP helper. > >About the LPM code we have already a 16-8-8 implementation. Now we are > working on the code to fit it into ODP architecture. But we have not > submitted any code

Re: [lng-odp] "Message too long" error message with Iperf testing

I am using the linux-generic with ODP v1.9.0.0 I am just running Iperf with default settings. But i will try similar experiments by turning off the segment offloading on the target NIC. Thank you for the pointer. Regards, Gyanesh Patra > On May 16, 2016, at 21:21, Bill Fischofer <bill.

[lng-odp] "Message too long" error message with Iperf testing

I have a simple *standalone application* using ODP. It receives packets on one interface and do a broadcasting to all other interfaces. But many a times i see this error message when i try to calculate the throughput using IPerf tool. pktio/socket_mmap.c:263:pkt_mmap_v2_tx():sendto(pkt

[lng-odp] VLAN rx-offload set/unset to handle vlan HDR removal

Hi, How does ODP handles the vlan header removal in accordance to vlan-rx-offload feature in linux/hardware? Are there any APIs for: 1. To know if vlan header is removed, if the offload feature is set or not? 2. What is the vlan value if the HDR is removed? 3. How to set/unset the

[lng-odp] LPM Algorithm APIs in ODP

I encountered an old email chain about the different LPM algorithm for ODP. I am curious if anyone has released or working on something for l3 forwarding/routing. Here is the link to the mail chain: https://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/lng-odp/2015-August/014717.html If any work is going on, then

[lng-odp] Fundamental difference between ODP and SAI (Switch Abstraction Interface) from OCP group

Hi All, I have seen ODP and SAI have good traction in networking community with very rapid contribution and development. Can anyone please explain how they are different from each other? What is the fundamental difference in their goal? Thanks P Gyanesh Kumar Patra