Re: Garbage-free Log4j docs preview

On Thursday, May 19, 2016 at 11:10:45 AM UTC+9, Jerry Shea wrote: > This is fantastic, thanks for this Remko. > > > Can I ask a couple of questions? > 1. is log4j 2.6 designed to operate garbage-free when used as an SLF4J > implementation too, or only with the native API? The log4j-slf4j-impl b

Apache Parent POM

We use a very old version 9 of the Apache Parent POM, where 18 is the current version. It might be worth updating our reference and clean up for 2.6. 2c, Gary -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition

Re: Apache Parent POM

Not being a Maven expert, a question: would this impact users in any way? If there's no downside then we should probably update. On Thursday, 19 May 2016, Gary Gregory wrote: > We use a very old version 9 of the Apache Parent POM, where 18 is the > current version. > > It might be worth updatin

Re: Apache Parent POM

I'd wait til after the release Sent from my iPad > On May 19, 2016, at 4:35 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We use a very old version 9 of the Apache Parent POM, where 18 is the current > version. > > It might be worth updating our reference and clean up for 2.6. > > 2c, > Gary > > -- > E-Mail

Re: Apache Parent POM

We've been keeping up to date on all our maven plugins manually, so it doesn't really seem like a huge deal. I'd wait until after release, too. On 19 May 2016 at 04:38, Ralph Goers wrote: > I'd wait til after the release > > Sent from my iPad > > On May 19, 2016, at 4:35 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:

Re: 2.6 Release

I've been making minor edits to the site and docs, but please feel free to start the release whenever you are ready. On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Remko Popma wrote: > I fixed 3 license issues (GilsDosAndDontsLatencyTesting.txt, log4j-perf/ > src/main/resources/perf-WithoutAnyAppender-locati

Re: Garbage-free Log4j docs preview

After looking more closely I found that the org.slf4j.spi.LocationAwareLogger::log method is currently not implemented in a

Re: 2.6 Release

In fixing the problem with ${filename} I found a bug. I am still debugging the second test that is creating that file. Given the slow internet at my hotel I may have to wait til next week. Ralph > On May 19, 2016, at 10:37 AM, Remko Popma wrote: > > I've been making minor edits to the site a