On Jun 21, 2007, at 12:56 PM, Scott Deboy wrote:
I'd like to finish implementing repository-wide property support - I
think what would solve both issues is to have
LoggingEvent.getProperties
just return the repository properties, not the MDC properties.
LoggingEvent.getMDC would continue to
222.0185
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.comotivsystems.com
-Original Message-
From: Curt Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 10:41 AM
To: Log4J Developers List
Subject: Re: apache-log4j-component-1.0 rc2
On Jun 21, 2007, at 1:18 AM, Scott Deboy wrote:
> I'd st
On Jun 21, 2007, at 1:18 AM, Scott Deboy wrote:
I'd still like us to consider finishing the property support
included in LoggerRepositoryEx (mostly requiring new functionality
being added to LoggingEvent). It would make finishing up the
backporting of the appenders & receivers essentially
.0185
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.comotivsystems.com
-Original Message-
From: Paul Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 6/21/2007 3:56 AM
To: Log4J Developers List
Subject: Re: apache-log4j-component-1.0 rc2
On 21/06/2007, at 4:18 PM, Scott Deboy wrote:
> I'd still like us to c
On 21/06/2007, at 4:18 PM, Scott Deboy wrote:
I'd still like us to consider finishing the property support
included in LoggerRepositoryEx (mostly requiring new functionality
being added to LoggingEvent). It would make finishing up the
backporting of the appenders & receivers essentially c
I'd still like us to consider finishing the property support included in
LoggerRepositoryEx (mostly requiring new functionality being added to
LoggingEvent). It would make finishing up the backporting of the appenders &
receivers essentially complete.
Also, I'm not sure of the state of our sup
