I have just been told that a couple of our presentations were miss-marked.
Please stand by... :-)
Nick
Sent from my iPhone, so please forgive brief replies and frequent typos
> On Feb 18, 2014, at 7:38, Nicholas Williams
> wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, they have wait-listed ALL FOUR of our prese
Unfortunately, they have wait-listed ALL FOUR of our presentations. It's rather
maddening how they kept emailing us saying "your project isn't represented" and
"not enough people have submitted CFPs," and now they decided that our project
won't be represented.
Nick
Sent from my iPhone, so ple
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Remko Popma wrote:
> Well done guys!
>
+1
G
>
> On Sunday, February 2, 2014, Nick Williams
> wrote:
>
>> Matt and I coordinated off-list today and got our presentation proposals
>> submitted to ApacheCon. Assuming they're all accepted, Log4j will have four
>> p
Well done guys!
On Sunday, February 2, 2014, Nick Williams
wrote:
> Matt and I coordinated off-list today and got our presentation proposals
> submitted to ApacheCon. Assuming they're all accepted, Log4j will have four
> presentations representing it. Go us!
>
> Nick
>
> On Jan 31, 2014, at 11:2
Matt and I coordinated off-list today and got our presentation proposals
submitted to ApacheCon. Assuming they're all accepted, Log4j will have four
presentations representing it. Go us!
Nick
On Jan 31, 2014, at 11:25 PM, Nick Williams wrote:
> Matt, sorry for the delay. I've had a bad cold to
I sound like a broken record, but please submit it right now,
as CFP is closed by 01.02.
Stop talking too much upfront, you surely can switch a few things.
http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/apachecon-north-america/program/cfp
Both talks btw sound very interesting!
On 1 Feb 2014, at 6:25
Matt, sorry for the delay. I've had a bad cold today. Ick. Anyway, my proposals
are below. I haven't submitted them yet. Haven't seen your proposals yet--can
you get them to me ASAP? If you decide you're uncomfortable committing to two
presentations, I'm prepared to also take on "Extending Log4j
On Saturday, February 1, 2014, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> On 31 Jan 2014, at 14:49, Matt Sicker wrote:
>
> Yeah that would work. Nashville huh? My co-worker is from there too, neat.
>>
>> In regard to the async and such, I think that'd be a great idea. One of
>> the selling points of log4j ove
On 31 Jan 2014, at 14:49, Matt Sicker wrote:
Yeah that would work. Nashville huh? My co-worker is from there too,
neat.
In regard to the async and such, I think that'd be a great idea. One
of the selling points of log4j over logback is performance, right?
I always add the reconfiguration th
Yeah that would work. Nashville huh? My co-worker is from there too, neat.
In regard to the async and such, I think that'd be a great idea. One of the
selling points of log4j over logback is performance, right?
Matt Sicker
> On Jan 31, 2014, at 0:52, Nick Williams wrote:
>
>
>> On Jan 30, 20
On Jan 30, 2014, at 9:25 PM, Matt Sicker wrote:
> On 30 January 2014 18:01, Nick Williams wrote:
> Matt,
>
> Do you want to share a hotel room? I know it would certainly help my finances
> to split one, and depending on whether you get employer support, it should
> probably help yours as well
Would you guys be interested in covering Async Loggers or other performance
topics?
On Friday, January 31, 2014, Matt Sicker wrote:
> On 30 January 2014 18:01, Nick Williams
>
> > wrote:
>
>> Matt,
>>
>> Do you want to share a hotel room? I know it would certainly help my
>> finances to split
On 30 January 2014 18:01, Nick Williams wrote:
> Matt,
>
> Do you want to share a hotel room? I know it would certainly help my
> finances to split one, and depending on whether you get employer support,
> it should probably help yours as well. I'm planning on being there all five
> days (staying
Matt,
Do you want to share a hotel room? I know it would certainly help my finances
to split one, and depending on whether you get employer support, it should
probably help yours as well. I'm planning on being there all five days (staying
in the hotel Sunday night through Thursday night)—you?
Please let me know if there's anything I can do to help.
-Remko
On Friday, January 31, 2014, Matt Sicker wrote:
> Alright, thanks for the info guys! I've started writing out the abstract
> and such for the presentation. I think that's a good idea submitting two
> CFPs (presentation and tutorial)
Alright, thanks for the info guys! I've started writing out the abstract
and such for the presentation. I think that's a good idea submitting two
CFPs (presentation and tutorial). I'll forward the CFPs after I'm done to
the list here for any ideas.
Nick, you said you'll be going, right? And accord
FWIW, I wouldn’t compare SLF4J against Log4j. SLF4J is just an API where we
provide a full implementation. The main alternatives are java.util.Logging
(aka JUL), Logback, and Log4j 1.x. if you search you will find a few others
too.
I would think you should submit 2 proposals and split your t
Please don't wait any longer Matt.
http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/apachecon-north-america/program/cfp
Submission must arrive before (!) 1.02. and they will not extend this
deadline.
However you talk sounds good. Just from experience, people are sometimes
setup
when they hear they sh
I know I'm not a committer (yet), but I would be interested in doing a talk on
logging. I'll see if I can get employer support as well. Is anyone else
interested in putting together a CFP or two? I'd like to cover the neat new
features in log4j, why we're more awesome than SLF4J, how to use logg
On 29 Jan 2014, at 0:22, Remko Popma wrote:
... I'm still learning proper ML etiquette...
Just for the record: i didn't mean you or anyone hear at Logging ;-)
Very nice slides, btw.
On Wednesday, January 29, 2014, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
I would love to go, but i have to deal with a
e to go as well but its not in my budget.
> >
> > Gary
> >
> >
> > Original message
> > From: Christian Grobmeier
> > Date:01/28/2014 14:01 (GMT-05:00)
> > To: Log4J Developers List
> > Subject: Re: ApacheCon CFP
> >
> > I would
2014, at 3:28 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I'd love to go as well but its not in my budget.
>
> Gary
>
>
> Original message
> From: Christian Grobmeier
> Date:01/28/2014 14:01 (GMT-05:00)
> To: Log4J Developers List
> Subject: Re: ApacheCon
... I'm still learning proper ML etiquette...
Very nice slides, btw.
On Wednesday, January 29, 2014, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> I would love to go, but i have to deal with a view personal issues (which
> are not meant to be discussed in public)
> That makes it impossible for me to travel.
>
I'd love to go as well but its not in my budget.
Gary
Original message
From: Christian Grobmeier
Date:01/28/2014 14:01 (GMT-05:00)
To: Log4J Developers List
Subject: Re: ApacheCon CFP
I would love to go, but i have to deal with a view personal issues
(which ar
I would really like to go but if I do I would have to take the days as unpaid
time off + the costs of the conference. That's one downside in going from a big
company to a very small one. I had hoped I would be able to present at the
conference since I'm very proud of what I've been working on f
I would love to go, but i have to deal with a view personal issues
(which are not meant to be discussed in public)
That makes it impossible for me to travel.
However I was presenting Apache Logging at ACEU 2012 and it was an
amazing experience.
I can only recommend it to everybody "new" at th
I'm interested but not sure if I can go (we are expecting our second child
early May...)
-Remko
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:29 AM, Nick Williams <
nicho...@nicholaswilliams.net> wrote:
> Guys, let's show up for Apache Logging! They're hurting for CFP's right
> now. Rich Bowen at ApacheCon assures
Guys, let's show up for Apache Logging! They're hurting for CFP's right now.
Rich Bowen at ApacheCon assures me that if money is an issue getting committers
to come and lead talks, the Travel Assistance Committee will do everything it
can to help you get there. Email them at t...@apache.org.
I'
I think I'll attend, but I'd like to see if someone here can answer some
questions for me. I can direct my questions to someone at ApacheCon, but I
figured this would be a quick first-go.
I noticed the fee is normally $799 (until Friday, then $1099), but it's $275
for "committers." That means t
I would like to attend but I’m not sure I can.
Ralph
On Jan 25, 2014, at 11:11 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I would like to remind you ApacheCon is happening in April 2014.
> If you would like to submit your talk, now is the chance.
>
> I think it would be great to have some
30 matches
Mail list logo
