Log4j users/developers
I've now tried endless combinations of parameters to the different
rollingfile appenders (CompositeRollingAppender, DailyRollingFileAppender,
RollingFileAppender) in log4j and they all make the application hang after a
rollover-attempt.
The application has a lot of threads
> Log4j users/developers
>
> I've now tried endless combinations of parameters to the different
> rollingfile appenders (CompositeRollingAppender,
> DailyRollingFileAppender,
> RollingFileAppender) in log4j and they all make the
> application hang after a
> rollover-attempt.
>
> The applicatio
http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
At 10:57 27.09.2001 +0100, you wrote:
>Log4j users/developers
>
>I've now tried endless combinations of parameters to the different
>rollingfile appenders (CompositeRollingAppender, DailyRollingFileAppender,
>RollingFileAppender) in log4j and
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 7:35 AM
To: LOG4J Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Class A fault in rolling-file algorithm(s)
http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
At 10:57 27.09.2001 +0100, you wrote:
>Log4j users/developers
>
>I've now tried endless c
> I get the gist of the original message here... but what is your
> reply?
As I read it, Ceki's reply is basically saying, "Please follow the
guidelines in this document - in other words, give us some more data to
work with, etc."
It's important that this gets fixed, but without more info
13:34
| To: 'LOG4J Users Mailing List'
| Subject: RE: Class A fault in rolling-file algorithm(s)
|
|
| Dear Ceki...
|
| I get the gist of the original message here... but what is your
| reply?
|
| We are gearing up to use log4j and this seems like an important
| issue
|
|
: Class A fault in rolling-file algorithm(s)
Stephen,
Ceki pointed out that I was imprecise (and probably rude), and he was
totally right. I went out of my way (my apologies to the log4j development
team). I didn't mean that other people should refrain from using log4j, I
just pointed out t
> Will send the results to Jon Skeet who most kindly promised
> to look into it.
Like Stephen, I'd like to say thanks for the open post :)
One thing though: I'll certainly look into any code you send me, but
would you mind if others did too? I'm far from an expert on Log4j and
the more eyes t
ised to look into it.
>
>Regards,
>
>--
>
>Thomas
>
>
>
>| -Original Message-
>| From: Stephen Levinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>| Sent: 27 September 2001 13:34
>| To: 'LOG4J Users Mailing List'
>| Subject: RE: Class A fault in rolling-
s,
| >
| >--
| >
| >Thomas
| >
| >
| >
| >| -Original Message-
| >| From: Stephen Levinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| >| Sent: 27 September 2001 13:34
| >| To: 'LOG4J Users Mailing List'
| >| Subject: RE: Class A fault in rolling-file algorithm(s
promised to
| look into it.
| >
| >Regards,
| >
| >--
| >
| >Thomas
| >
| >
| >
| >| -Original Message-
| >| From: Stephen Levinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| >| Sent: 27 September 2001 13:34
| >| To: 'LOG4J Users Mailing List'
| >| Subject: RE: Cl
-
| | >| From: Stephen Levinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| | >| Sent: 27 September 2001 13:34
| | >| To: 'LOG4J Users Mailing List'
| | >| Subject: RE: Class A fault in rolling-file algorithm(s)
| | >|
| | >|
| | >| Dear Ceki...
| | >|
| | >| I get
o learn on the
> path to omniscience ;)
>
> Thanks for everybodys concern and valuable feedback.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
>
> Thomas
>
> | -Original Message-
> | From: Thomas Tuft Muller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> | Sent: 27 September 2001 15:22
> | To
13 matches
Mail list logo
