Re: Separate InitialContext

2001-01-29 Thread Ceki Gülcü
At 08:22 26.01.2001 -0800, you wrote: >Hello, > >I'm planning on using the JMSAppender. I noticed that the Context in >JMSAppender is created with a no-argument InitialContext. Is it possible to >configure Log4j into its own separate initial context factory? >Otherwise, I would need to extend the

Re: Separate InitialContext

2001-01-29 Thread Roger Kjensrud
PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 5:55 AM Subject: Re: Separate InitialContext At 08:22 26.01.2001 -0800, you wrote: >Hello, > >I'm planning on using the JMSAppender. I noticed that the Context in >JMSAppender is created with a no-argument InitialContext. Is it poss

Re: Separate InitialContext

2001-02-05 Thread Armin Rauch
Roger Kjensrud wrote: > > I extended the JMSAppender and included the url and the initial context > factory in the config and it works just fine. If there is any interest I can > post the extended JMSAppender for others to use. > > I'm using SwiftMQ, and I notice that the publishing of the Loggi

RE: Separate InitialContext

2001-02-08 Thread Kitching Simon
IL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Separate InitialContext > > Attached is my modified JMSAppender. Include the following properties in > your properties/xml file: > > log4j.appender.A1=com.cj.foundation.log4j.JMSLogger > log4j.appender.A1.TopicBindingN

Re: Separate InitialContext

2001-02-08 Thread Roger Kjensrud
Attached is my modified JMSAppender. Include the following properties in your properties/xml file: log4j.appender.A1=com.cj.foundation.log4j.JMSLogger log4j.appender.A1.TopicBindingName=testtopic log4j.appender.A1.TopicConnectionFactoryBindingName=TopicConnectionFactory log4j.appender.A1.Initial

Re: Separate InitialContext

2001-02-08 Thread Ceki Gülcü
Roger, Thank you for your contribution. However, isn't the JMSLogger just an extension of JMSAppender? I find it upsetting that you have chosen to remove the original author's name (me in this case) when most of the code is manifestly copied from JMSAppender. I am not claiming that the JMS

Re: Separate InitialContext

2001-02-08 Thread Kevin Steppe
Ceki, Did you get my JDBCAppender contribution? Kevin Ceki Gülcü wrote: > Roger, > > Thank you for your contribution. However, isn't the JMSLogger just an extension of >JMSAppender? > > I find it upsetting that you have chosen to remove the original author's name (me in >this case) when mos

Re: Separate InitialContext

2001-02-08 Thread Roger Kjensrud
Ceki, you're absolutely right about I just copied a great deal of the JMSAppender. However, my intentention was not to contribute this code; it was just for others to take a look at. If you think this code should be included in the log4j package, I'll do so the appropriate way including the co

RE: Separate InitialContext

2001-02-08 Thread Roger Kjensrud
esday, February 07, 2001 8:16 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Separate InitialContext > > Attached is my modified JMSAppender. Include the following properties in > your properties/xml file: > > log4j.appender.A1=com.cj.foundation.log4

RE: Separate InitialContext

2001-02-14 Thread Ceki Gülcü
l Message- >> From: Roger Kjensrud [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 8:16 PM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Re: Separate InitialContext >> >> Attached is my modified JMSAppender. Include the fol