> All test category messages sent to A1 and all messages sent to A2 both
> get logged at all levels. Is there anything saved by having the category
> check, as opposed to sending the message to the appender to be checked
> there as well?
Thanks Rob,
I will have two appenders, and one will only lo
ED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 7:24 PM
Subject: RE: modifying log levels through a management console
> >>Were can I find a reference of the possible properties of an appender,
for
> example the DailyRollingFileAppender ? <<
>
> There isn't one, yet. I've
At 10:52 05.06.2001 -0700, you wrote:
>Mark Masterson wrote:
>
>>In your example, the easiest way to achieve what you're after is to use the
>>"Threshold" parameter, common to all Appenders, and set its priority as
>>appropriate.
>
>
>Is it more performant to set the log level via the Appender o
Mark Masterson wrote:
> Short answer: I think that you would find that setting the priority at the
> Category level is faster, in terms of absolute performance.
That's what I was assuming for the reasons you mentioned in your
explanation. As for benchmarking.. maybe after I get the product
>>Is it more performant to set the log level via the Appender or via
Categories?<<
Ah, here I'm likely to get myself in trouble, as this is (for me, at least)
a subtle and complicated issue.
Short answer: I think that you would find that setting the priority at the
Category level is faster, in t
Mark Masterson wrote:
> In your example, the easiest way to achieve what you're after is to use the
> "Threshold" parameter, common to all Appenders, and set its priority as
> appropriate.
Is it more performant to set the log level via the Appender or via
Categories? Here's my example...
lo
>>Were can I find a reference of the possible properties of an appender, for
example the DailyRollingFileAppender ? <<
There isn't one, yet. I've just started writing one, but it won't be done
until the end of July, or mid-August. That's the short answer: the long
answer == in fact, you can fi
Were can I find a reference of the possible properties of an appender, for
example the DailyRollingFileAppender ?
Why ? I like to know how to filter log messages by his category when send to
an appender.
For example: the console should log message with category => DEBUG and the
DailyRollingFileAp
You don't need to jump through this many hoops to get this behavior - there
is an easier way to achieve dynamic, run-time re-configuration using
standard config files. Specifically, you don't need to roll your own file
listener - Log4J already has one. To do this, you subclass FileWatchdog and
t
Title: RE: modifying log levels through a management console
Hi there,
I made such a console myself, and after even extending it a little bit more, I was planning to mail it Ceki as a contribution. But if you really want to use it now, no problem, just mail me and I'll send it t
Hi,
We had a similar requirement of runtime modification of log levels in our
project. We could do it easily
since we had already instrumented our software using Applixray's AIC
implementation for Java.
However, it really boils down to just having a file modification listener
that monitors the c
st
Betreff: modifying log levels through a management console
It would be nice to be able to modify log levels during run time.
I built into my logger the ability to get a list of all logs ( categories )
and modify the log level of each during runtime, so I can turn on debugging
and debug in a
It would be nice to be able to modify log levels during run time.
I built into my logger the ability to get a list of all logs ( categories )
and modify the log level of each during runtime, so I can turn on debugging
and debug in a production environment if necessary, without restarting the
serv
13 matches
Mail list logo
