Have you tried using the JNDI repository selector solution, such as
in Log4j-1.3? To test this out quickly, you could just try using
Log4j-1.3 and its ContextJNDISelector class to perform the repository
selection. I know it works. I'm not sure why you are seeing odd
results with the classl
"What do you mean "'pcs' is the log file name"? That would be the logger
name,
not the file name."
My mistake, I meant to say that it is both the logger name as well as I
named the log file name same too after the application name.
I tried with both LogFactory of commons-logging as well as direc
On Apr 10, 2007, at 6:09 PM, Pramodh Peddi wrote:
Curt,
Thanks for the response. Do you thinking the solution is difficult
because I am not using XML configuration? Or irrespective of my using
XML configuration or programmatic configuration, the solution is
difficult?
Thanks,
-Pramodh.
The
Kamal,
Thanks for the response. At which point do I make it to explicitly use
TCP protocol in your recipe/suggestion?
Thanks,
-Pramodh.
-Original Message-
From: Kamal Ahmed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 4:43 PM
To: Log4J Users List
Subject: RE: SyslogAppender
Curt,
Thanks for the response. Do you thinking the solution is difficult
because I am not using XML configuration? Or irrespective of my using
XML configuration or programmatic configuration, the solution is
difficult?
Thanks,
-Pramodh.
-Original Message-
From: Curt Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL
Quoting sohan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I changed to use Log4j.xml from Log4j.properties and also changed to
> non-static loggers and with in the static methods followed the link
> examples. Now the logging is taking place only for the loggers mentioned in
> the static methods, Log log = LogFactory
On Apr 10, 2007, at 4:01 PM, Kamal Ahmed wrote:
Maybe , Async Appender can be re written using
java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue
Just a suggestion
-Kamal.
LinkedBlockingQueue was introduced in JDK 1.5. log4j 1.2 must run on
older JVM's and alternative JVM's that do not suppor
Maybe , Async Appender can be re written using
java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue
Just a suggestion
-Kamal.
-Original Message-
From: Curt Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 4:58 PM
To: Log4J Users List
Subject: Re: AsyncAppender Issue
>
> Has anyo
Has anyone else experienced this type of behavior with the
AsyncAppender?
Thanks.
Nope. You should pack up your test case and file a bug report to see
if we can figure out what is going on. If you can identify the
problem and propose a patch even better.
---
Here is the AsyncAppender configuration in my log4j.xml file:
I've tried setting buffer to "false" and "true". I'm only creating
three logs in my test case, so I was thinking this may not be a full
buffer problem.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Jame
How are you configuring AsyncAppender. I think it has an option that
throws away logs when the buffer is full.
On 4/10/07, Luedecke, Michael J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm losing logs when I use the AsyncAppender for some reason. This loss
of logs occurs whether I'm using a custom appender o
I'm losing logs when I use the AsyncAppender for some reason. This loss
of logs occurs whether I'm using a custom appender or out-of-the-box
appender (i.e. FileAppender).
I have not noticed this problem when I send a string in the log method
call. It only seems to happen when I pass an object
I changed to use Log4j.xml from Log4j.properties and also changed to
non-static loggers and with in the static methods followed the link
examples. Now the logging is taking place only for the loggers mentioned in
the static methods, Log log = LogFactory.getLog("pcs"); pcs is the log file
name.
A
On Apr 10, 2007, at 12:30 PM, sohan wrote:
Hi,
My goal is to get separate logging for each application deployed on
the same
weblogic instance using Log4j loaded once during startup.
I tried couple of test web applications using Log4j.xml file and
seems to be
working. To test the same wi
Hi,
My goal is to get separate logging for each application deployed on the same
weblogic instance using Log4j loaded once during startup.
I tried couple of test web applications using Log4j.xml file and seems to be
working. To test the same with my current application, I copied log4j.xml,
very
I've sent 3 emails to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' over
the last week and I'm still subscribed.
Suggestions? thx.
Erik Ostermueller
Try putting the log4j JAR file in each of the application's WEB-INF/lib
directory so each application will have its own version to initialize. I
ran into this when I tried to put the log4j JAR file in a shared library
and another application got "confused" on where to log. I put it back in
my
2007/4/10, Wyss Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
hi wim,
i did not find any way to change the pattern, neither in the webstart nor
in the download version (with vigilog-1.3-SNAPSHOT.jar renamed to replace
vigilog-1.2.1.jar). but then i'm not sure if i realy have 1.3 working...
- how can i set the p
hi wim,
i did not find any way to change the pattern, neither in the webstart nor in
the download version (with vigilog-1.3-SNAPSHOT.jar renamed to replace
vigilog-1.2.1.jar). but then i'm not sure if i realy have 1.3 working...
- how can i set the pattern?
- is there a way to see which version
Hi Maarten,
%x is not supported for the moment. Can you send me a private email with an
example log file so I can add support for it?
regards,
Wim
2007/4/10, Maarten Bosteels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Wim,
We are using org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout with following pattern %d [%t]
%x %-5p %50.50c
Wim,
We are using org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout with following pattern %d [%t]
%x %-5p %50.50c - %m%n
Vigilog doesn't seem to support this ?
Maarten
Message:
java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException:
net.sourceforge.vigilog.parse.LogFileParserException: Unsupported conversion
item: %x
Level:
I just tried with "%-5p [%t] %c - %m%n" as conversion pattern and it works
ok. I don't know what those numbers are behind the category?
I also updated to the latest version of log4j and jgoodies. The other
dependencies seem to be on the latest version.
Tailing is currently not supported, you nee
22 matches
Mail list logo
