[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12909433#action_12909433
]
Nicko Cadell commented on LOG4NET-1:
I am currently out of the office with no access
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12478426
]
Nicko Cadell commented on LOG4NET-109:
--
What happens if you use:
securityContext type
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-97?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nicko Cadell resolved LOG4NET-97.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.2.11
Assignee: Nicko Cadell
I have committed
Curt,
I think that the Apache license notice is already being emitted into the
generated documents, your change adds it in twice.
Unless there is something wrong with the current source for
http://logging.apache.org/log4net/ then I think we should revert this
change.
Cheers,
Nicko
Not a problem, many thanks.
nicko cadell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+44 (0)20 7025 0933
http://www.neoworks.com/
software consultancy.solutions.support
Neoworks Limited is a company registered in England at 2-3 North Mews,
London, WC1N 2JP with company number 1001737.
-Original
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12475726
]
Nicko Cadell commented on LOG4NET-114:
--
I have changed the test build to run the tests for the current
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12475793
]
Nicko Cadell commented on LOG4NET-114:
--
I have checked in an update to the tests that should fix the line
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12474325
]
Nicko Cadell commented on LOG4NET-114:
--
The main issue with running the unit tests from NAnt is that the nunit
1. Build should be reproducible (other than timestamps and
other trivia)
I'm not sure how you are handling strong naming in your
releases. If you have a signing key, we may want to find a
way to securely share the key. Perhaps have it gpg encrypted
for multiple private keys
PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] A
separate vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED] will be called to accept log4net.
Votes:
Curt Arnold +1 (PMC)
Nicko Cadell (PMC)
That was a +1 from me!
Niall Daley +1 (committer)
Ron Grabowski +1 (committer)
No other votes cast. Vote was open for more than
I have built log4net sources using NAnt 0.85 without any problems.
As we previously required a nightly build of 0.85 pre-release I suggest
it is worth transitioning to the release version.
Nicko
Nicko Cadell
log4net development
http://logging.apache.org/log4net
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nicko Cadell resolved LOG4NET-110.
--
Resolution: Invalid
Assignee: Nicko Cadell
The equivalent effect can be achieved using
Components: Appenders
Affects Versions: 1.2.10
Reporter: Nicko Cadell
Assigned To: Nicko Cadell
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 1.2.11
The UdpClient object must be configured for either IP v4 or IP v6 when it is
created. Once configured it cannot be used
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-112?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12472360
]
Nicko Cadell commented on LOG4NET-112:
--
Details from an email on the log4net-dev list.
From: Olivier DALET
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-112?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nicko Cadell resolved LOG4NET-112.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed by adding support for IPv6 to the UdpAppender
Add support
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nicko Cadell updated LOG4NET-100:
-
Affects Version/s: (was: 1.2.11)
IPAddressConverter improvement for .NET 2 or .NET 3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nicko Cadell resolved LOG4NET-100.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.2.11
Assignee: Nicko Cadell
Added code
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nicko Cadell resolved LOG4NET-104.
--
Resolution: Duplicate
At Run time, when I update configuration parameters, I wish
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-98?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nicko Cadell resolved LOG4NET-98.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.2.11
Assignee: Nicko Cadell (was: Ron
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12472477
]
Nicko Cadell commented on LOG4NET-109:
--
I do not understand how your proposed functionality is different from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12472479
]
Nicko Cadell commented on LOG4NET-108:
--
It would be possible to implement this feature without modifying
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12472481
]
Nicko Cadell commented on LOG4NET-106:
--
How about just using a PatternLayout to render the string
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-92?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nicko Cadell resolved LOG4NET-92.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.2.11
Assignee: Nicko Cadell
Updated code
+1
-Original Message-
From: Curt Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 February 2007 18:50
To: Log4NET Dev
Subject: [VOTE] Graduating the incubator
There was a previous discussions log4net-dev on 2006-09-18 http://
marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=log4net-devm=115861418117968w=2
not find one on the people.apache.org map (which only shows
people who
disclosed their location).
I will try to contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] to join the Apache Web
of Trust.
If Ron can publish his key then we can get 2 committers into the web.
Regards,
Nicko
Nicko
I think if we were going to optimise the EffectiveLevel by pushing the
level changes down the hierarchy we would want to build this into the
framework rather than leaving it to a plugin.
I guess a Logger would need to listen for an EffectiveLevelChanged event
on its parent logger. When the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-98?page=comments#action_12445418 ]
Nicko Cadell commented on LOG4NET-98:
-
The NOTICE file will have to be updated as follows:
**
** NOTICE file corresponding to the section 4 (d
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-88?page=comments#action_12427146 ]
Nicko Cadell commented on LOG4NET-88:
-
When you upload an attachment there is a pair of radio buttons just under the
file browser. I believe that you
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-89?page=comments#action_12427160 ]
Nicko Cadell commented on LOG4NET-89:
-
The standard layouts always return a non-null string. The 'raw' layouts return
an object, which will be null
Actually I think that the ColoredConsoleAppender can be built by the
Mono 1.1 and 2.0 compilers. It may have been excluded because of APIs
that used not to be supported.
The ColoredConsoleAppender will only work if run in a Windows
environment as it uses direct API calls to Kernel32, therefore it
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-77?page=comments#action_12424305 ]
Nicko Cadell commented on LOG4NET-77:
-
For consistency i would go for SystemInfo.NullText
A small improvement
What sort of encryption are you using? Are you writing to an encrypted
windows file or are you using some sort of encrypted stream. Have you
made your changes pluggable so that instead of creating an encrypted
file we could create a compressed file?
Nicko
-Original Message-
From:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-86?page=comments#action_12424324 ]
Nicko Cadell commented on LOG4NET-86:
-
The only problem with rolling the counter back to 0 is if the appender is
initialised with the existing files
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-84?page=comments#action_12424196 ]
Nicko Cadell commented on LOG4NET-84:
-
The LoggingEvent captures the event TimeStamp as close as possible to when the
event occurred, not when it is written
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-84?page=all ]
Nicko Cadell closed LOG4NET-84.
---
Resolution: Invalid
Assignee: Nicko Cadell
Closing this issue as invalid because it is a usage requirement that can be
resolved by correct configuration
I'm going to be away on holiday from July 19th to 28th. During this time
I will be off the grid, so to speak, without internet access.
Cheers,
Nicko
Nicko Cadell
log4net development
http://logging.apache.org/log4net
The AppenderSkeleton uses a lock to ensure that the calls to the
subclass' Append method are serialised. This makes the job of writing a
custom appender much easier as you don't have to deal with threading.
The FastDbAppender does not use a lock to serialise the calls to the
Append method, or to
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-80?page=comments#action_12421084 ]
Nicko Cadell commented on LOG4NET-80:
-
If we are going to have to support both CallContext and HttpContext as storage
locations for the LogicalThreadContext
Versions: 1.2.10
Reporter: Nicko Cadell
Assigned to: Nicko Cadell
Fix For: 1.2.11
SecurityException thrown in LogicalThreadContextProperties GetProperties
The LogicalThreadContext stores its properties in the CallContext. The
CallContext methods GetData ans SetData have
Cliff,
The AdoNetAppender is designed to be a generic configurable appender for
writing to any ADO database. If you have a specific database in mind you
may be better served building a custom appender. Especially if you have
a fixed database schema in mind.
There is an simple example database
Assumption: only the official owner of log4net should be
able to sign the log4net.dll assembly with the official
public/private key pair.
That is the key point we need to decide. Does this assumption hold for
open source projects? Or should _everything_ required to build an
identical copy
All devs,
It was not my intention to change the strong name key for the 1.2.10
release. Due to some misadventure the key has changed between version
1.2.9 and 1.2.10. This has the undesirable effect of preventing binding
redirects between these version working.
I am still investigating where my
Morten,
The LogManager.GetLogger(Type) method uses the Type.FullName property to
get a string that represents the type name.
In your case the output is correct.
TestApplication.MyGenericClass`1[[TestApplication.MyClass,
TestApplication, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null]]
The Incubator PMC has approved our release of log4net 1.2.10.
I will try to get the downloads into the right place and update the
website sometime tonight.
Cheers.
Nicko
-Original Message-
From: Mark Womack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 April 2006 02:43
To:
at the
Apache Software Foundation (ASF), sponsored by the Apache Logging
Services project. While incubation status is not necessarily a
reflection
of the completeness or stability of the code, it does indicate that the
project has yet to be fully endorsed by the ASF.
Nicko Cadell
log4net dev
]
Sent: 08 April 2006 07:17
To: Nicko Cadell
Subject: Slight change to SVN's AssemblyInfo
Niko,
Since I really don't have time to join the dev. mailing list
and the user list isn't the proper place for it, I'm sending
you this AssemblyInfo.cs.
It essentially does the same set of #ifs
The final tally of the votes from the log4net-dev list are:
Binding votes:
+1 Nicko Cadell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
+1 Niall Daley ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
+1 Ron Grabowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Non-binding votes:
+1 Morten Andersen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
+1 Dag Christensen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
No '-1' or '0
This internal error message is not designed to be valid XML or machine
readable. It was just some for of human readable mark-up which is used
to delineate the separate components of the message. Maybe it was a
mistake to use a syntax that looked like it should be XML.
There is no expectation that
-dev approves this release then we still
require release approval from the logging PMC and from the incubator.
Nicko Cadell
log4net development
http://logging.apache.org/log4net
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-74?page=all ]
Nicko Cadell resolved LOG4NET-74:
-
Fix Version: 1.2.10
Resolution: Fixed
Change MemoryAppender member variables to protected
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-73?page=all ]
Nicko Cadell updated LOG4NET-73:
Summary: ADONetAppender.ActivateOptions() leaks database connection when
called multiple times (was: ADONetAppender.ActivateOptions() database
Connection
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-70?page=all ]
Nicko Cadell resolved LOG4NET-70:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Check in to update referenced dll name has fixed this issue.
CoreDll.dll referenced with different capitalisation
This is by design, but it is subtle behaviour.
The configuration attributes are loaded from the first assembly to call
log4net.LogManager.GetLogger. Configuration attributes on other
assemblies loaded into the process are ignored. What this basically
means is that you main assembly should get a
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-69?page=all ]
Nicko Cadell resolved LOG4NET-69:
-
Fix Version: 1.2.10
Resolution: Fixed
This is fixed and i have added a test to ensure that malformed format strings
don't leak exceptions
Reporter: Nicko Cadell
Assigned to: Nicko Cadell
Priority: Trivial
The MemoryAppender is designed to hold the log events in an internal array. The
appender can be subclassed, however the internal list is not available to
subclasses.
This appender will be more useful if the members
/
No. The appender-ref must be specified as a child element. The
intention is to allow zero or more appenders to be referenced, this is
best served by using an element.
Nicko
- Morten
Nicko Cadell wrote:
what are you trying to do?
-Original Message-
From: Morten
Components: Appenders
Versions: 1.2.9
Reporter: Nicko Cadell
Assigned to: Nicko Cadell
ADONetAppender.ActivateOptions() calls InitializeDatabaseConnection. This
method does not check if the m_dbConnection is already initialised. If it is
initialise then it will beleaked.
Update
preclude it either.
I think this would be a worthwhile performance improvement to make.
On Mar 19, 2006, at 11:12 AM, Nicko Cadell wrote:
It is also worth mentioning that, unlike log4j, in log4net the user
does not interact with the Logger directly but with a wrapper. The
Logger
Cadell
Assigned to: Nicko Cadell
Priority: Trivial
Fix For: 1.2.10
The CoreDll.dll is referenced as both CoreDll.dll and coredll.dll. This has no
effect on functionality but we should be consistant and use CoreDll.dll.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you
Reorganise source repository to support multiple src projects
-
Key: LOG4NET-71
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-71
Project: Log4net
Type: Task
Reporter: Nicko Cadell
The log4net
Performance of ILog.xxxFormat methods
-
Key: LOG4NET-72
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-72
Project: Log4net
Type: Improvement
Reporter: Nicko Cadell
The performance of the ILog.xxxFormat methods can
what are you trying to do?
-Original Message-
From: Morten Andersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 March 2006 17:31
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Subject: Property Name in AppenderSkeleton is not virtual
Hi
Is it possible to change this to virtual? Please?
--
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-72?page=all ]
Nicko Cadell reassigned LOG4NET-72:
---
Assign To: Nicko Cadell
Performance of ILog.xxxFormat methods
-
Key: LOG4NET-72
URL: http
It is also worth mentioning that, unlike log4j, in log4net the user does
not interact with the Logger directly but with a wrapper. The Logger
(ILogger) has a Log method that is used to log all the messages. The
wrapper LogImpl (implements ILog) has all the Debug/Info/Warn/Error
methods which
The final tally of the votes from the log4net-dev list are:
Binding votes:
+1 Nicko Cadell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
+1 Niall Daley ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
+1 Ron Grabowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Non-binding votes:
+1 Morten Andersen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
No '-1' or '0' votes were cast.
The proposal
I would favour doing both 3 and 4. That is log as much as can be logged
through the appender as configured by the user. This information may be
important to them. Also log the failure in the internal log, which
currently goes to the console and debug out.
We need to write a save version of the
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-69?page=all ]
Nicko Cadell reassigned LOG4NET-69:
---
Assign To: Nicko Cadell
FormatException thrown when *Format methods are given a malformed format
string: log.DebugFormat(Malformed {{,,,5}format{8
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-69?page=all ]
Nicko Cadell updated LOG4NET-69:
Summary: Exception thrown when *Format methods are given a malformed
format string (was: FormatException thrown when *Format methods are given
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-69?page=all ]
Nicko Cadell updated LOG4NET-69:
Version: (was: 1.2.10)
(was: v.Next)
version 1.2.10 does not actualy exist yet so this issue does not affect it. The
issue exists
A question from Curt. Have any of the other committers been able to
reproduce this build?
-Original Message-
From: Curt Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 March 2006 20:35
To: Logging General
Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish log4net 1.2.10
No tag for source, but did have an
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-60?page=all ]
Nicko Cadell updated LOG4NET-60:
Summary: possible bugs in RollingFileAppender.cs causing failure to timely
roll files on monthly or yearly intervals (and inappropriate error reports
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-13?page=all ]
Nicko Cadell updated LOG4NET-13:
Summary: Allow SMTPAppender to have replaceable parameters in Subject
(was: Allow SMTPAppender to have replacable parameters in Subject)
Description
approval from the logging PMC and from the incubator.
Nicko Cadell
log4net development
http://logging.apache.org/log4net
-Original Message-
From: Nicko Cadell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 March 2006 17:23
To: Log4NET Dev
Subject: Release Plan for 1.2.10
Hi all
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-59?page=comments#action_12369012 ]
Nicko Cadell commented on LOG4NET-59:
-
Ron,
I much prefer exposing the DateTimeStrategy rather than adding specialised
control flags, this allows the user to implement
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-60?page=all ]
Nicko Cadell reassigned LOG4NET-60:
---
Assign To: Nicko Cadell
possible bugs in RollingFileAppender.cs causing failure to timly roll files
on monthly or yearly intervals (and inappropriate
The xdocs are built using velocity templates derived from the
logging.apache.org/site templates. Therefore they are actually built in
Java using Velocity and Ant. The build file is not compatible with NAnt.
The build.xml file could do with a large comment to warn users of this
anomaly.
It would
Rajeev,
The best way is to create an enhancement in our issue tracking system.
For details see
http://logging.apache.org/log4net/contributing.html#patch
Cheers,
Nicko
-Original Message-
From: Rajeev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 February 2006 09:22
To:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-65?page=all ]
Nicko Cadell resolved LOG4NET-65:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Checked in a code fix to this issue that adds additional try/catch blocks to
check for the PathDiscovery permissions exception
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-58?page=all ]
Nicko Cadell resolved LOG4NET-58:
-
Fix Version: 1.2.10
Resolution: Fixed
I have checked in a code change that resolves the obsolete warning messages
from the .NET 2.0 compiler
-gui.exe?
- Original Message
From: Nicko Cadell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Log4NET Dev log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 12:06:24 PM
Subject: RE: PatternLayoutTest sometimes passes, sometimes fails
-Original Message-
From: Ron Grabowski
'
, needed by `../../class/lib/net_2_0/Microsoft.Build.Engine.dll'. Stop.
make[8]: Leaving directory
`/cygdrive/c/work/rnd/mono/head/mono-1.1.10.20051214/mcs/class/Microsoft
.Build.Engine'
Cheers
Nicko Cadell
NeoWorks Limited
mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web www.neoworks.com
tel +44 (0
of
them are definitely fixed (by Atsushi).
There might still be one issue that not been merged into
gmcs, but log4net compiles without any warning on the
mono-1.0 profile (without your changes).
You can safely rollback these changes.
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Nicko
-Original Message-
From: Ron Grabowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 December 2005 19:46
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Subject: PatternLayoutTest sometimes passes, sometimes fails
Is there any particular reason why we're still using the
depreciated Assertion class
-Original Message-
From: Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 December 2005 08:52
To: Nicko Cadell
Subject: RE: Log4net patch to fix ambiguous references in XML docs
Are you planning on introducing ChangeLog files in each
directory, or do you still plan on manually
to dig around on the website to find their bug
tracking section or create an account on an issue tracking
system just to take a quick peak at what changed.
--- Nicko Cadell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11
Our current policy is to build a separate binary for each platform and
version, so we have a number of #ifdefs which switch functionality for
the different platforms and versions. We try to keep the number of
special cases like this in the code to a minimum and so far have no
added platform
The RollingFileAppender does not currently support patterns for the
numeric file extensions. The rolled file number must be the last part of
the filename for the appender to identify it.
If anyone wants to try to implement this enhancement I think it should
be relatively straight forward. The
If you look at the output you got it did do exactly what you asked it to do,
that is the result of running -MMM-dd;quot;.txt;quot; through the
DateTime.ToString formatter. The 't's in the string are mapped to the 'A' or
'P' of the AM/PM specifier. An XML entity reference for single quote is
Ron,
That second patch looks good, my only suggestion would be to move where
the AppSettings are read from the
Repository/Hierarchy/XmlHierarchyConfigurator.cs class. The
XmlHierarchyConfigurator will only be executed if a user configures
log4net via a config file, it will not be run if they
p: 617.715.3031
Cambridge, MA 02138 m: 617.834.1291
http://www.11.com f: 810.963.2708
-Original Message-
From: Nicko Cadell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2005 3:02 PM
To: Log4NET Dev
Subject: RE: Interest in OpenNETCF (1.4)
Hi Kevin
) from
an application
Regards, Andrej
-Original Message-
From: Nicko Cadell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2005 12:44 PM
To: Log4NET Dev
Subject: RE: WMI Appender
Andrej,
A WmiAppender is something that we want to support in
log4net. I think we
I just did it on the root (logging/log4net) and on the trunk
(logging/log4net/trunk) folder. I did not apply it recursively because
TortoiseSVN searches up the folder structure to find the properties. I
added the properties to the trunk folder because some people may want to
just checkout that
Hi Kevin,
OpenNETCF isn't something that I was aware of, thanks for your email
bringing it to our attention. It looks like the OpenNETCF library makes
up for many of the shortfalls of the base NETCF platform.
Many of the appenders in log4net which are not built for the NETCF
platform could be
I'm not too sure that the log4net node in the configuration should be
used to set the log4net.Internal.Debug or log4net.Internal.Quiet flags.
These are global flags and currently setting log4net debug=true will
turn on this global flag, but this is usually too late. If the user
want to enable
Likewise with the log4net nullText=NULL-TEXT
notAvailableText=NOT-AVAILABLE-TEXT, if these are set on the
Repository then they should be repository specific. They could be stored
in the Repository.Properties collection, but we would need to make sure
that everything that needed the text knows
Ron,
Sounds like a good idea, why don't you add a property to SystemInfo to
get the 'null' text.
To allow the user to override this text we can just use an appSetting,
say log4net.NullText.
Nicko
-Original Message-
From: Ron Grabowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 November 2005
WmiAppender
---
Key: LOG4NET-51
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-51
Project: Log4net
Type: New Feature
Components: Appenders
Reporter: Nicko Cadell
Assigned to: Nicko Cadell
Add a sample appender that supports firing events
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-52?page=all ]
Nicko Cadell resolved LOG4NET-52:
-
Fix Version: 1.2.10
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Nicko Cadell
Allow XML configurator to set properties of type Object
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-53?page=all ]
Nicko Cadell resolved LOG4NET-53:
-
Fix Version: 1.2.10
Resolution: Fixed
Added method AddProperty to Hierarchy. The property element in the config
maps through to this method
Process.StartTime hangs on some systems
---
Key: LOG4NET-50
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-50
Project: Log4net
Type: Bug
Components: Core
Versions: 1.2.9
Reporter: Nicko Cadell
Assigned
1 - 100 of 231 matches
Mail list logo
