RE: Thoughts on 1.3

2014-02-06 Thread Gert Driesen
read. :-) >-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >Von: gert.drie...@telenet.be [mailto:gert.drie...@telenet.be] >Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. Februar 2014 22:15 >An: Log4NET Dev >Betreff: Re: Thoughts on 1.3 > >Hey Miljenko, > >I don't think it makes sense to create a

Re: Thoughts on 1.3

2014-02-06 Thread Miljenko Cvjetko
Hi Gert On 2014.02.05 22:14, gert.drie...@telenet.be wrote: Hey Miljenko, I don't think it makes sense to create a separate "client-profile" version. MS has already abandoned this: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc656912(v=vs.110).aspx I'm aware of that. Maybe the term "client-profile"

Re: Thoughts on 1.3

2014-02-05 Thread gert . driesen
richt - Van: "Miljenko Cvjetko" Aan: "Log4NET Dev" Verzonden: Dinsdag 4 februari 2014 14:44:00 Onderwerp: Re: Thoughts on 1.3 Hi On 2014.02.04 13:24, w...@poczta.fm wrote: > Hi > > If You work on port of log4net to Xamarin You may find helpful the patch &g

Re: Thoughts on 1.3

2014-02-04 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2014-02-04, Miljenko Cvjetko wrote: > Hi >>> 1. "to split log4net-13.dll so that the main assembly can be used for >>> the client profile and a separate assembly contains the stuff that >>> requires System.Web - this way we no longer need the -cp builds." >> Dominik convinced me there was no fu

Re: Thoughts on 1.3

2014-02-04 Thread Miljenko Cvjetko
Hi 1. "to split log4net-13.dll so that the main assembly can be used for the client profile and a separate assembly contains the stuff that requires System.Web - this way we no longer need the -cp builds." Dominik convinced me there was no future for the client profiles anyway, but back then I d

Re: Thoughts on 1.3

2014-02-04 Thread Miljenko Cvjetko
Hi On 2014.02.04 13:24, w...@poczta.fm wrote: Hi If You work on port of log4net to Xamarin You may find helpful the patch attached to LOG4NET-338 "Port of log4net for MonoDroid" (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-338). I saw Your patch after I was finished. AndroidAppender was al

Re: Thoughts on 1.3

2014-02-04 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2014-02-03, Miljenko Cvjetko wrote: > So I would suggest You to do as Stefan suggested: > 1. "to split log4net-13.dll so that the main assembly can be used for > the client profile and a separate assembly contains the stuff that > requires System.Web - this way we no longer need the -cp builds

Re: Thoughts on 1.3

2014-02-04 Thread wdec
Hi If You work on port of log4net to Xamarin You may find helpful the patch attached to LOG4NET-338 "Port of log4net for MonoDroid" (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-338). My port does not change the structure of the library however some parts may still work for You. Regards Wojci

Re: Thoughts on 1.3

2014-02-03 Thread Miljenko Cvjetko
Sorry for formatting. Pasted it directly from google docs into thunderbird and here it looked OK. sorry one more time mel On 2014.02.03 15:32, Miljenko Cvjetko wrote: * Hi I have tried to post this one through the nabble on Nov 25th and 26th. The I got dragged away with projects, then hol

Re: Thoughts on 1.3

2013-10-28 Thread Ramon Smits
Why not just apply semver and make it v2? -- Ramon On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Dominik Psenner wrote: > >On 2013-10-25, Dominik Psenner wrote: > > > >>> * the next release will be 1.3.0 and require .NET 2.0 or better > > > >>> I.e. we remove support for .NET 1.0 and 1.1, Compact Framewor

Re: Thoughts on 1.3

2013-10-27 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2013-10-25, Dominik Psenner wrote: >> * the next release will be 1.3.0 and require .NET 2.0 or better >> I.e. we remove support for .NET 1.0 and 1.1, Compact Framework 1.0, >> Mono < 2.0, SSCLI and CLI 1.0 frameworks > That's even worth a +2! ;-) >> * the main assembly will get a new name