-from-my-web-service-%28.net-2.0%2C-C-%29--nothing-happens-tp20244011p20247590.html
Sent from the Log4net - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
: Sriram Ranganathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 6:22 AM
To: log4net-user@logging.apache.org
Subject: Using log4Net from my web service (.net 2.0, C#); nothing happens
My web service is using C# and .Net 2.0
When a "handled" exception is thrown during the w
My web service is using C# and .Net 2.0
When a "handled" exception is thrown during the web service call, the
service should return normally but should log some information so some admin
chappie can look at it later.
So I thought of usnig log4net but don't know how to. After chec
___
On 13.11.2006 10:50, Karel Kral wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> When trying to log into an access db using the AdoNetAdapter with an
> OleDb connection i get the following error in a VS 2005 (.NET 2.0)
> project (see bellow). I am logging from log4net sample app ConsoleApp,
> config file i
Hi all,
When trying to log into an access db using the AdoNetAdapter with an
OleDb connection i get the following error in a VS 2005 (.NET 2.0)
project (see bellow). I am logging from log4net sample app ConsoleApp,
config file is attached.
I have found exactly same question in mailing list
ssion in the Medium trust zone! If
this is the case on your deployment platform then you can't log to a
file!
Cheers,
Nicko
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 10 July 2006 13:47
> To: 'Log4NET User'
> Subject:
PM
To: Log4NET User
Subject: RE: ASP .NET 2.0 Security error - Config problems - Any ideas?
Daniel,
The 2 changes, adding the requirePermission="false" and calling
XmlConfigurator.Configure() from the Application_Start, do fix the
ConfigurationPermission exception that you were seeing
rce from SVN or use the source from the 1.2.10 release and
manually apply the above changes.
Cheers,
Nicko
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 10 July 2006 09:47
> To: 'Log4NET User'
> Subject: RE: ASP .NET 2.0 Sec
ssage-
From: Ron Grabowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 09, 2006 8:51 PM
To: Log4NET User
Subject: Re: ASP .NET 2.0 Security error - Config problems - Any ideas?
See if this works:
log4Net and ASP.Net Medium Trust
http://tinyurl.com/njqh4
http://blogs.advantaje.com/blog/kevin
See if this works:
log4Net and ASP.Net Medium Trust
http://tinyurl.com/njqh4
http://blogs.advantaje.com/blog/kevin/Net/2006/06/29/log4Net-and-ASP-Net-Medium-Trust.html
--- Daniel Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there
>
>
>
> I'm using log4net with an ASP .
niel Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 29 June 2006 07:50
> To: log4net-user@logging.apache.org
> Subject: ASP .NET 2.0 Security error - Config problems - Any ideas?
>
> Hi there
>
>
>
> I'm using log4net with an ASP .NET 2.0 application. On my
> loca
Hi there
I'm
using log4net with an ASP .NET 2.0 application. On my local machine all works
well, but when deployed to an ISP, there are no logs.
After
much debugging, I discovered that log4net was failing on a "Security
Error" (see error message below) – i.e., the
Thanks, i ll give it a go with the SQLAppender (will have to change dbs
but i am curious now about this weird problem).
Jon Froehlich wrote:
I'm using it right now in .NET CF 2.0 without any problem. My database,
however, is Mobile SQL Server 2005.
Here's the config:
the exact same exception (both
> when using the OleDbConnection signature for .NET 2.0 and when omitting the> public key.). For the record, i have tried using all respective versions of the> .dll that come with the incubating log4net
1.2.10.>> Thanks> N>>Hasn't anyone
Nikos Viorres wrote:
Hi Ron,
Thanks for your help.
I did try what you suggested and came up with the exact same exception (both
when using the OleDbConnection signature for .NET 2.0 and when omitting the
public key.). For the record, i have tried using all respective versions of the
.dll that
Ron Grabowski yahoo.com> writes:
>
> I think this it the correct OleDbConnection signature for .NET 2.0:
>
> System.Data.OleDb.OleDbPermission, System.Data, Version=2.0.0.0,
> Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089
>
> Maybe the error is occuring becuase yo
I think this it the correct OleDbConnection signature for .NET 2.0:
System.Data.OleDb.OleDbPermission, System.Data, Version=2.0.0.0,
Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089
Maybe the error is occuring becuase you're telling .NET 2.0 to use the
1.1 object.
What happens if you omi
Hi all,
When trying to log into an access db using the AdoNetAdapter with an OleDb
connection i get the following error in a VS 2005 (.NET 2.0) project.
Please take note that the exact same project with the same configuration
works fine under .NET 1.1 (VS 2003).
A first chance exception of
.net
2.0 for com+ servicedcomponent
Cord,
yep - the "root folder" from your DLL
point-of-view is the startup folder of the application which uses your DLL -
in many cases this is indeed %SYSTEMROOT%\System32.
Regarding the repository name: I've
got this
9 (228) 97983-602Fax +49 (228)
97983-34[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.datatrak.net
From: Thomas, Cord [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 5:12 PMTo: Log4NET
UserSubject: RE: Log4net with .net 2.0 for com+
servicedcomponent
Michael
Thank you. This is maybe the key piece i
at an assembly name is
- it is the namespace of my EventSink (which also happens to be
AnEventSink)?
Thank
you
Cord
From: Michael Hinkel
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006
1:19 AMTo: Log4NET UserSubject: RE: Log4net with .net
2.0 for com+ servicedcomponent
ATRAK Deutschland
GmbHMichael HinkelSoftware DeveloperRochusstrasse 6553123
BonnTel +49 (228) 97983-602Fax +49 (228)
97983-34[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.datatrak.net
From: Thomas, Cord [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 10:36 PMTo:
log4net-user@logging.apache.orgSubj
I have a working c#
exchange event sink (serviced component) that will do things like autoaccept,
log message activities in a database and route messages. I wanted to
use log4net with this but am having problems
The core problem is
that i am not getting any log messages (though i tried va
ry 2006 19:33
> To: Nicko Cadell
> Subject: RE: a question about .Net 2.0 and log4net
>
> Hi Nicko,
>
> Thanks for the great explanation.
>
> I also have a question about asynchronous logging. I
> couldn't find any references in the mailing list archives or
>
TED] On Behalf Of LadyShug
> Sent: 24 February 2006 05:29
> To: log4net-user@logging.apache.org
> Subject: Re: .NET 2.0
>
> Great... I've been having issues during the conversion
> process when trying to open the log4net project with visual
> studio 2005 (.net 2.0)
>
> could you please forward me the source you used
>
>
>
>
>
>
/
--- LadyShug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Great... I've been having issues during the conversion process when
> trying to
> open the log4net project with visual studio 2005 (.net 2.0)
>
> could you please forward me the source you used
>
>
>
>
>
>
Great... I've been having issues during the conversion process when trying to
open the log4net project with visual studio 2005 (.net 2.0)
could you please forward me the source you used
builds.
The log4net assemblies support binary backward compatibility. The .NET
1.0 build of log4net will run fine on the .NET 1.1 and .NET 2.0
runtimes. There is no problem using the .NET 1.0 or .NET 1.1 builds of
log4net with the .NET 2.0 runtime.
There is a special build, the 'CLI 1.0 Compa
there. But which version is best
for a productive environment? On which version is your .NET 2.0 version
based? Is it ready to use it in a productive environment?
As I mentioned before, I also need a .NET Compact Framework 2.0 version. Was
it straightforward to fix it for the (full) 2.0 version? Or
Kian,
A lot of people (especially those who work for large companies) have
not made the switch to .NET 2.0 yet. At my company we've just started
discussions about putting .NET on some of our virtual machines. It will
be quite some time (several months) before its deployed company wide.
I gl
a) Its the same people. Nicko's been leading it as long as I remember.
b) Even if its at Apache, its still available to the "developer community".
c) If you've already gone through the work of running the .NET 2.0
solution/project convertor and have cleaned up the 120 or so
Hi Kian,
is that version only a "blank" compilation against 2.0 or does it use some
of the new features in .NET 2.0? E. g. rendering System.Exception.Data
collection if it contains items?
Regards,
Marco
> --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
> Von: "Florian Brunner"
Hi Kian,
yeah, I would like to have the .NET 2.0 version. Could you drop me a mail?
However, I'm still confused a bit. I thought (and hoped) that the .NET
Framework is backwards compatible to libraries compiled under .NET 1.x.
(Though, I haven't found such a statement on the msdn
To all those who asked about log4net availability on the .NET Framework
2.0: it was easy enough to compile it, took me less than two hours to
adapt the code and test it.
If you do not want to do the same chore yourself, I'll be happy to
provide the updated sources, just drop me an e-mail.
IM
When will a version of Log4Net compiled for the .NET 2.0 Framework be
available for download?
Thanks, Joe
_
The new MSN Search Toolbar now includes Desktop search!
http://toolbar.msn.co.uk/
John,
I'm looking into that, but I can't promise an exact date on when it'll be
compiling on .NET 2.0.
Gert
- Original Message -
From: "John Cole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Log4NET User'"
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 5:02 PM
Subje
I pulled the log4net source out of cvs and tried to compile it with .net
2.0, but ran into a lot of errors. Are there instructions on how to get it
to compile, or better yet, a modified makefile/buildfile to get it working?
Thanks,
John Cole
-
This email
: log4net and .net 2.0
Did you try it? If it works then I'd say its ok to use the 1.1 dll.
--- David Thielen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi;
>
>
>
> For .net 2.0, should I use the .net 1.1 dll?
>
>
>
> Thanks - dave
>
>
>
>
Did you try it? If it works then I'd say its ok to use the 1.1 dll.
--- David Thielen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi;
>
>
>
> For .net 2.0, should I use the .net 1.1 dll?
>
>
>
> Thanks - dave
>
>
>
>
Hi;
For .net 2.0, should I use the .net 1.1 dll?
Thanks – dave
Hi;
For .net 2.0, should I use the .net 1.1 dll?
Thanks – dave
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Richman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 25 April 2005 20:15
> To: log4net-user@logging.apache.org
> Subject: log4net on .NET 2.0 Beta 2
>
> Are there any issues running log4net on .NET 2.0 Beta 2?
Not that I am aware of, but I
Are there any issues running log4net on .NET
2.0 Beta 2? I’m using log4net-1.2.0-beta8, and I’m trying to find
the root cause of this error on one server. I have an .asmx that invokes
methods of a class library I wrote, which uses log4net’s EventLogAppender.
Invoking methods of the .asmx
der. There isn't really much to tell
because I haven't seen a single problem that I thought had anything to
do with .net 2.0.
Oliver Sturm
--
omnibus ex nihilo ducendis sufficit unum
Spaces inserted to prevent google email destruction:
MSN oliver @ sturmnet.org Jabber stu
4:18 PM
To: Log4NET User
Subject: RE: .NET 2.0?
Jim,
Gert did some work to support building log4net under .NET 2.0. I believe
that current state is that log4net has warnings when built under .NET
2.0, but because we treat warnings as errors this causes the build to
fail, however you should
Jim,
Gert did some work to support building log4net under .NET 2.0. I believe
that current state is that log4net has warnings when built under .NET
2.0, but because we treat warnings as errors this causes the build to
fail, however you should be able to build it yourself.
If you do try to get it
Hello,
I know it’s not supported yet, but has anyone out
there successfully attempted to use this against .NET 2.0? I’m interested
in building an Appender to hit SQL Server 2005 – but I don’t want
to go to far down that path if others have already tried and failed to use even
the most
47 matches
Mail list logo
