Pierre Abbat schrieb:
On Wednesday 12 November 2008 16:36:46 Jon "Top Hat" Jones wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Michael Turniansky
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
Personally, I would have used broctu or brogi'a (which would be
distinct from the cohen, brori'ija'a, or soemthing along those
de'i li 12 pi'e 11 pi'e 2008 la'o fy. Pierre Abbat .fy. cusku zoi skamyxatra.
> And we don't have a gismu or lujvo in jbovlaste for "priest".
.skamyxatra
Actually, the entry for "{lijda}" specifically lists "{jdaca'i}," "{jdaka'i},"
and "{jdaja'a}" as possible translations for "priest" or "clerica
On Wednesday 12 November 2008 16:36:46 Jon "Top Hat" Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Michael Turniansky
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > Personally, I would have used broctu or brogi'a (which would be
> > distinct from the cohen, brori'ija'a, or soemthing along those lines),
> > b
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Michael Turniansky
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Personally, I would have used broctu or brogi'a (which would be
> distinct from the cohen, brori'ija'a, or soemthing along those lines),
> but that's just the opinion of this Orthodox Jew. Although you do
> have a po
Personally, I would have used broctu or brogi'a (which would be
distinct from the cohen, brori'ija'a, or soemthing along those lines),
but that's just the opinion of this Orthodox Jew. Although you do
have a point about the universality of the borrowing. If you do want
to go with the fu'ivla, Pier
On Wednesday 12 November 2008 08:58:29 Jorge Llambías wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Yoav Nir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Unfortunately, I understand that I can't use "rabi" as a type-4 fu'ivla
> > because it falls apart "the think we mentioned before + 8".
>
> Right. You need a conso
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Yoav Nir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't like xebro jdaca'i because it's rabi in all natural languages, and I
> believe that when the word is similar in most natural languages (like
> spaghetti or curry) it should be imported as a fu'ivla. No reason for lojba
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 2:31 AM, Jorge Llambías <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Yoav Nir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I searched jbovlaste and could not find an Indian Chief, or even an
> American
> > Indian or native american. I could make up a big tanru with
> > le
On Tuesday 11 November 2008 19:31:49 Jorge Llambías wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Yoav Nir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I searched jbovlaste and could not find an Indian Chief, or even an
> > American Indian or native american. I could make up a big tanru with
> > leader+aboriginal+am
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Yoav Nir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I searched jbovlaste and could not find an Indian Chief, or even an American
> Indian or native american. I could make up a big tanru with
> leader+aboriginal+american or even condense it into a lujvo, but then I'd
> get somethi
10 matches
Mail list logo
