Re: Templating Solutions

2001-06-18 Thread Richard Clamp
e, not a programming one. It's different enough so that you can't easily put too much programming logic into it, IME at least. -- Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "so we've got a deadline. we can do deadlines."

Re: early peek at a bit of fun

2001-06-15 Thread Richard Clamp
MyAunt modules. -- Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "so we've got a deadline. we can do deadlines."

Re: Training anyone ?

2001-06-13 Thread Richard Clamp
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 03:43:27PM +0100, Dave Thorn wrote: > > I'm half tempted to see what they'd teach me though... :) > > personal hygiene? ;) So that's why you never come home anymore... -- Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Training anyone ?

2001-06-13 Thread Richard Clamp
x27;m half tempted to see what they'd teach me though... :) -- Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Persistent Perl

2001-06-12 Thread Richard Clamp
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 09:54:01PM +0100, Robin Szemeti wrote: > is this anything like wot FastCGI does .. or is that summat different? Since 'this' is a bit muddy I couldn't say, though I do know that FastCGI works as a constantly running coprocess, so maybe -- Ric

Re: YAPC::Europe Registration

2001-06-12 Thread Richard Clamp
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 07:41:48PM +0100, Neil Ford wrote: > So who's registered then? ;-) I have, now to write[0] the talks. [0] always with the writing! -- Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: London.pm posting stats

2001-06-09 Thread Richard Clamp
On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 09:57:52PM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote: > On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 09:10:53PM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote: > > And how about a signal/noise bias? ;-) > > The noise *is* signal. I'll have what he's drinking. -- Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: crazy golf

2001-05-31 Thread Richard Clamp
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 07:40:46PM +0100, Jonathan Stowe wrote: > I'm still up for organizing it - its just herding you cats up in one place > is the problem. If you book it, they will come. -- Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Forthcoming Meetings

2001-05-31 Thread Richard Clamp
ke to do I as a 5-minute thingy. Also assuming Mark doesn't bonk me over the head we'll do I, which is 25 minutes, with projector, audio and a brandy glass full of brown M&Ms. Now to write the thing, rather than just playing with magicpoint. -- Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Decompression

2001-05-31 Thread Richard Clamp
you just create a local lib path with Archive::Tar in it and say you didn't cheat? -- Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Another Perl Question

2001-05-24 Thread Richard Clamp
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 04:13:35PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Any suggestions? use Scalar::Util qw( blessed ); -- Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Election Manifestos

2001-05-24 Thread Richard Clamp
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 09:13:12AM +0100, Robert Shiels wrote: > Typical quotes from Simon this week: Ah, he'd be fine if it weren't for those fucking mood swings. -- Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: London.pm List Weekly Summary 2001-05-07

2001-05-10 Thread Richard Clamp
that have ever passed through my camera, so don't go saying rude things about my nan. -- Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Apocalypse Two

2001-05-04 Thread Richard Clamp
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 10:25:07AM +0100, Struan Donald wrote: > i kind of like -> from a visual point of view. Your eyes will be adapted to server perl6. -- Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Apocalypse Two

2001-05-04 Thread Richard Clamp
te? :) Don't miss the smiley, I don't actually care. I'm really looking forward to apoc9, multi-dimensional slices makes my brain water. -- Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Not Matt's Scripts

2001-05-02 Thread Richard Clamp
kes you > pull down the latest f**king perl distribution which doesn't f**cking > compile on your machine!" step 1: configure CPAN step 2: upgrade CPAN step 3: configure the new CPAN step 4: use CPAN yes it sucks mildly, it's still a helluva lot more convinient than doing it

Re: Tech mtg?

2001-04-18 Thread Richard Clamp
to bring it tomorrow. -- Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

2001-04-10 Thread Richard Clamp
; Thanks for warning me. > > Does anyone want to take on the task of being projector monitor and picking > it up from Sussex? Sure, I'll polish up the terrorist-mobile[1]. Someone mail me off-list with some instructions. [1] Which contrary to what Micheal J Fox thinks, will do 90, eventually. -- Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Crazy Idea

2001-04-03 Thread Richard Clamp
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 04:48:15PM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote: > > Volunteers for a rescue party step forward. Do we get guns, lots of guns? -- Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Crazy Idea

2001-04-03 Thread Richard Clamp
and get lots of cider, and then spend the night around a > camp fire, drinking and talking. Cool, it may even spur me into getting the van a little more habitable than it currently is. -- Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Kevin Smith Film Fest - Jason Lee

2001-03-07 Thread Richard Clamp
h imdb does seem to also call him Spike Jones, for which I blame the contributors. -- Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Kevin Smith Film Fest

2001-03-07 Thread Richard Clamp
rick Harris to appear... Yeah, but I imagine he's too busy with his directing career. -- Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Kevin Smith Film Fest

2001-03-06 Thread Richard Clamp
n, but it's never my first choice. > Anyone else drink too much and wake up on a train in the middle of > Hampshire thursday night? Or was it just me..? I didn't, but I did have this terrible habit of getting mildly tipsy with london.pm, and then waking up the next morning in Birmingham. I managed to reduce the ugliness by moving. -- Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Kevin Smith Film Fest

2001-03-06 Thread Richard Clamp
say yes. Not as good as you may hope, but very much fun. Kindof like Dogma really. -- Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: No http://london.pm/ :-(

2001-02-22 Thread Richard Clamp
they were going to do it 'in the future' or 'never' too. Don't start holding your breath just yet. -- Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Car giveaway

2001-02-22 Thread Richard Clamp
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 01:33:45PM +, Dave Thorn wrote: > have you *seen* the car?! :) Shush, I'm trying to get rid of it :) -- Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Car giveaway

2001-02-22 Thread Richard Clamp
This is very off-topic, but it's too late now :) I have a B registered Sierra to get shot of[1], no tax, no mot, runs (though right now the battery is very flat) Any takers? Email me off-list. [1] As I now have an old old camper van :) -- Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: t-shirts

2001-02-22 Thread Richard Clamp
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 12:27:07PM +, Michael Stevens wrote: > On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 12:24:46PM +0000, Richard Clamp wrote: > > Okay, it's pre pre alpha, it does nothing, and it's not even an > > very good way of doing the nothing it does. I haven't even

Re: t-shirts

2001-02-22 Thread Richard Clamp
> I think Mr Clamp has been doing initial development on this, but > has not yet released his code. Okay, it's pre pre alpha, it does nothing, and it's not even an very good way of doing the nothing it does. -- Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> #!/usr/bin/perl -w use P

Re: the list

2001-01-31 Thread Richard Clamp
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 11:50:45AM +, Michael Stevens wrote: > It's oh so quiet. > > After recent activity this is somewhat disconcerting. I don't know, before it was fast as lightning. Which was a little bit frightening. -- Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Damian's Latest

2001-01-30 Thread Richard Clamp
so found a good use for it (Algorithm::MarkovChain) -- Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: .emacs

2001-01-30 Thread Richard Clamp
sorting it out. :-( That cause efs != angeftp. M-x apropos efs-.*-process would be my best guess for where to start tweaking. Either that or look for something like ftp-command, and change the value of that from ftp to pftp[0] [0] YMMV is you're not using the same ftp doohicky as my box does. -- Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: .emacs

2001-01-29 Thread Richard Clamp
at's what you get for posting before/while your modem connection messes you about as you download mail. D'oh -- Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: .emacs

2001-01-29 Thread Richard Clamp
scp, well that'll probably be in your path. -- Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Another Template Toolkit Q

2001-01-29 Thread Richard Clamp
I've outputted? > > Is that possible? istr if you give it a scalar reference, as the 3rd parameter, then it puts it in there. Hang on, isn't there an actual Template Toolkit mailing list. -- Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Technical Meeting Venues

2001-01-29 Thread Richard Clamp
ng 'Birmingham - damnit, now how do I get through this sodding one way system' -- Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Mailing List Archive

2001-01-26 Thread Richard Clamp
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 12:27:02PM +, David Cantrell wrote: > On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 12:00:24PM +0000, Richard Clamp wrote: > > > Personally I like to be able to get mbox archives in preference to web > > archives, but then I like my mail client much more than my web brosw

Re: Mailing List Archive

2001-01-26 Thread Richard Clamp
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 11:50:35AM +, Greg McCarroll wrote: > * Richard Clamp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > That said I would have liked to have been informed of it when subscribing to > > the list (or for those of us that have been here for donkeys, when it > > sta

Re: Mailing List Archive

2001-01-26 Thread Richard Clamp
archived, the list being open to all anyway. That said I would have liked to have been informed of it when subscribing to the list (or for those of us that have been here for donkeys, when it started getting archived,) just so that I could be sure it was happening. -- Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: odd -w effect

2001-01-24 Thread Richard Clamp
'C-x RET f'. I can highly recommend undecided-unix. -- Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Holy War

2001-01-19 Thread Richard Clamp
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 03:44:42PM +, Roger Burton West wrote: > I'd use Debian 'cos I like it. Downside: latest versions of stuff > aren't usually available as packages. Untrue, if you're following the testing/unstable branch and have sufficient bandwidth th

Re: apologies

2001-01-18 Thread Richard Clamp
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 11:41:29AM +, Neil Ford wrote: > Well I have both The Matrix and MIB with me on DVD and a DVD capable > powerbook.. > > Movie intermission anyone? Cool, 20 minutes is plenty enough to watch all the good bits in The Matrix. God bless chapter-seek.

Re: OT : DVD

2001-01-15 Thread Richard Clamp
ffect. I gave up. -- Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: - The Register is working for the enemy

2001-01-06 Thread Richard Clamp
used modules. Of course it's interesting to note that the reg site itself is a twisted heap of mod_perl spewed forth from the fevered brains of Birmingham.pm. Which is nice. -- Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

copious free time

2001-01-05 Thread Richard Clamp
silly) module in the CPAN. -- Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Fwd: SPUG: ActivePerl 623

2001-01-02 Thread Richard Clamp
d so that you don't remember it. The original Mission Impossible series, though good when I saw it at the tender age of 14 is the dullest most pointless thing possible to watch. Apart from 2001 that is. -- Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Getting keys of mapped hash?

2001-01-02 Thread Richard Clamp
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 03:21:15PM -, Jonathan Peterson wrote: > > > my @sort=sort keys %{ +{ map { $_ => undef } @list } }; > ^^ > > ?? > > What does +{} do??? It says 'Yes damnit, I want an anonymous hash here, not one of those pe