Neil Ford noted:
> Quick bit of digging and I've found the following;
> [Heat Magazine, 19-25 May 2001]
> "The producers of Buffy, Fox TV, have offered ridiculous soundbites to justify
> switching TV networks in the US. The WB, home to Buffy since it's inception,
> did not match the "passion" and
From: Greg McCarroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001 10:43 AM
[there are actually no spoliers left in this post so I'm removing the
spoiler space]
> i'm a little worried that the next season will suck.
> lets wait and see if the warning signs are there, more
> weird settings i.e.
SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT*
> > > > > > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT*
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> &
* Dave Hodgkinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Greg McCarroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > now i remember
> > the good old days of live and kicking with sarah green and pete and simon
> >
> > ahhh halycon days
>
> halcyon?
>
some of us are blessed with typing speeds above that of normal
Greg McCarroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> now i remember
> the good old days of live and kicking with sarah green and pete and simon
>
> ahhh halycon days
halcyon?
Anyway we all know it peaked with Sally James...
--
Dave Hodgkinson, http://www.hodgkinson.org
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 04:45:45PM +0100, Leo Lapworth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Dave, U still need last weeks video ?
Nope. All caught up now thanks.
Dave...
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> >
>> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> &
gt; *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT*
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >>
* Jonathan Stowe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, Matthew Robinson wrote:
>
> > [1] Don't ask me why I was watching Live & Kicking as I don't know the
> > answer
> >
>
> Oh we will ask you, and you are expected to make up some bulllshit however
> ludicrous, now that Ant & Dec do
On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, Matthew Robinson wrote:
> [1] Don't ask me why I was watching Live & Kicking as I don't know the
> answer
>
Oh we will ask you, and you are expected to make up some bulllshit however
ludicrous, now that Ant & Dec dont do it you cant say you fancy them ...
/J\
LER ALERT*
>> > > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT*
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
*SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT*
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
gt;
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Well what about last nig
gt; *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT*
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
gt;
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Well what about last nig
gt; *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT*
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
&
ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT*
> > *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT*
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
RT* *SPOILER ALERT*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Well what about last night?
*SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT*
*SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT*
*SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT*
Well what about last night? Buffy no more? Well I'm p
> Morse Code, just to something that _looks_ like Morse Code.
I'm glad you said that cos when I was in the audience I couldn't match
up what I saw with what the program was (although I only got as far as
character 3 so assumed there was some kind of preamble). Mind you,
I only do 15-20wpm aural
At 06:10 27/02/01 -0500, you wrote:
>At Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:58:55 +, Matthew Robinson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> At 05:29 27/02/01 -0500, you wrote:
>> >At Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:13:30 +, Matthew Robinson
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> At 04:38 27/02/01 -0500, you wrote:
>> >> >
>> >>
At Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:58:55 +, Matthew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> At 05:29 27/02/01 -0500, you wrote:
> >At Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:13:30 +, Matthew Robinson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> At 04:38 27/02/01 -0500, you wrote:
> >> >
> >> >Oh, and I've had a quick look at Bleach.
At 05:29 27/02/01 -0500, you wrote:
>At Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:13:30 +, Matthew Robinson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> At 04:38 27/02/01 -0500, you wrote:
>> >
>> >Oh, and I've had a quick look at Bleach.pm and Morse.pm and wish to
>> >raise a bug against Morse.pm. It doesn't actually convert stu
Dominic Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 04:38:49AM -0500, Dave Cross wrote:
> > p.s. And don't get me started on my nightmare journey. I thought that
> > all night buses went thru Trafalgar Sq - the N19 doesn't :(
>
> Ugh. At least I got on the right end of the tr
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 04:38:49AM -0500, Dave Cross wrote:
> p.s. And don't get me started on my nightmare journey. I thought that
> all night buses went thru Trafalgar Sq - the N19 doesn't :(
Ugh. At least I got on the right end of the train and ended upin
Brighton... I think that connex just
At Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:13:30 +, Matthew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> At 04:38 27/02/01 -0500, you wrote:
> >
> >Oh, and I've had a quick look at Bleach.pm and Morse.pm and wish to
> >raise a bug against Morse.pm. It doesn't actually convert stuff to
> >Morse Code, just to something t
At 04:38 27/02/01 -0500, you wrote:
>
>So, was that fun or what?
Yep
>
>Oh, and I've had a quick look at Bleach.pm and Morse.pm and wish to
>raise a bug against Morse.pm. It doesn't actually convert stuff to
>Morse Code, just to something that _looks_ like Morse Code.
Another bug, when a scrip
So, was that fun or what?
Thanks to everyone who turned up and a special thanks for everyone
who made it possible - Damian (obviously), Merijn Broeren, Mike Davis,
Paul Mison and Andy Williams (for paying for the hall) and the
unnameable organisation who brought Damian to London in the first
p
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 10:08:29AM -, Robert Shiels wrote:
> I've been there loads of times and a lot of the enjoyment comes from
> watching the faces of the uninitiated as they realise they have definitely
> come to the wrong place.
Gentlemen, start your noodles :-)
> Paul, why are you up a
From: "Paul Makepeace" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> It's cool because you end up sitting on the big table and
> meeting other people by 'accidently' lashing them with noodles.
>
> Paul (why should only children get to play with food?)
I think it's a case of knowing what to expect. If you expect quick,
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 09:15:07AM +, Redvers Davies wrote:
> They are not rude - its a lie. The correct term I think is apathetic.
Funnily enough the times I've complained about the food they've done
something about it fairly promptly. Sure they tutted and rolled their
eyes but they did act
> Really? Mine says "Marvellously hostile staff", "rudest restaurant in
> the world", "madhouse", "the abuse gimmick". Golden Dragon all the
> way!
They are not rude - its a lie. The correct term I think is apathetic.
However, don't expect eye contact while taking the order (they will be
watchin
Leon Brocard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dave Hodgkinson sent the following bits through the ether:
>
> > Zagat rates the service as "legendary".
>
> Really? Mine says "Marvellously hostile staff", "rudest restaurant in
> the world", "madhouse", "the abuse gimmick". Golden Dragon all the
> wa
Dave Hodgkinson sent the following bits through the ether:
> Zagat rates the service as "legendary".
Really? Mine says "Marvellously hostile staff", "rudest restaurant in
the world", "madhouse", "the abuse gimmick". Golden Dragon all the
way!
Leon
--
Leon Brocard.ht
Piers Cawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Redvers Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > It took me 3 hours to get home :-(
> >
> > It took me 2 hours (via Wong Kei, BBQ pork noodle soup, Hot Duck with
> > plum sause).
>
> I'm more of a BBQ duck noodle soup and a plate of green vegetable
Redvers Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > It took me 3 hours to get home :-(
>
> It took me 2 hours (via Wong Kei, BBQ pork noodle soup, Hot Duck with
> plum sause).
I'm more of a BBQ duck noodle soup and a plate of green vegetable in
oyster sauce man myself. But Mmm... Wong Kei...
--
Pi
> plum sause).
s/ause/auce/ to work even, not home so its not the same so pretend I
didn't write this.
> It took me 3 hours to get home :-(
It took me 2 hours (via Wong Kei, BBQ pork noodle soup, Hot Duck with
plum sause).
> The TVRs were 34 quid each but had about 8 shots of vodka and 8 shots of
> tequila in and 6 cans of redbull.
Ok, I've heard of TVR's but yet to see one. Would someone like to give me
an idea as to how many of these things are meant to be consumed by how many
people.
How is it presented?
The
> I'm going to find out if we can have the upstairs bar of the Albemarle on
> Dover St. It's sufficiently small that we should be able to have it to
> ourselves, but sufficiently large that we won't be crowded. They do good
> beer and I'm fairly certain they do food in the evenings.
I'm biased
>
> I liked it because it only took 20 mins to get home :)
>
It took me 3 hours to get home :-(
/Robert
Alex Page wrote:
> It didn't seem too bad - my pints were 2.50 each, which for central London isn't
>bad. There were certainly space issues, however.
Hmm. yeah. There was a bit of a mix up - I booked in advance and asked
for seating for 30 people but when I arrived they'd done standing space
f
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 05:43:27AM -0500, Dave Cross wrote:
> I hope that everyone who turned up last night had a good time
Certainly did. Sorry I didn't get to meet many people or stay very long, but Thursday
nights are notoriously busy for me.
> I'd be interested in any opin
At 11:57 02/02/2001 +, Greg wrote:
>so all we need is a private room in a pub in central london that does
>food
Does EC2 count as central London ?
The White Hart in Clifton Street (near Liverpool Street station) has a
private room that would be big enough.
They do food and as a plus point
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 11:27:17AM +, David Cantrell wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 05:43:27AM -0500, Dave Cross wrote:
> > I hope that everyone who turned up last night had a good time - I
> > certainly did (that may, of course, have something to do with the fact
> >
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 05:43:27AM -0500, Dave Cross wrote:
> I hope that everyone who turned up last night had a good time - I
> certainly did (that may, of course, have something to do with the fact
> that I was drinking for the first time for a month).
>
> I'd be intere
round 15 people we
are probably going to easily cover any minimum spend or a 30 quid room
charge
dave can mentioned somewhere and volunteered to be the next social
meeting organiser last night
for the heretics meeting, it looks like the anchor and im going to see
if can reserve a private nook in it
Gr
I hope that everyone who turned up last night had a good time - I
certainly did (that may, of course, have something to do with the fact
that I was drinking for the first time for a month).
I'd be interested in any opinions that people had about the venue as
I'm still looking for a ne
51 matches
Mail list logo
