Greg McCarroll wrote:
>
> * Simon Wistow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > This summary has been bought to you by the letters Alpha, Beta and
> > Gamma, the numbers 1,3,5,7 all superimposed and the colour Octarine.
>
> and 2, please 2, it'll keep me happy, then we can discuss if 1 is
> a prime nu
* Philip Newton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Greg McCarroll wrote:
> >
> > * Simon Wistow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> > > This summary has been bought to you by the letters Alpha, Beta and
> > > Gamma, the numbers 1,3,5,7 all superimposed and the colour Octarine.
> >
> > and 2, please 2, it
Greg McCarroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Philip Newton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Greg McCarroll wrote:
> > >
> > > * Simon Wistow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > >
> > > > This summary has been bought to you by the letters Alpha, Beta and
> > > > Gamma, the numbers 1,3,5,7 all superimp
* Piers Cawley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> > No, definetly not. The partial set of prime numbers increases over
> > the journey through integers. 1 is the logical starting point,
> > and so it is added. This is the very spirit of primality. However
> > this may be the rantings of a madman, i
On Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 06:59:10PM +, Greg McCarroll wrote:
>
> No, definetly not. The partial set of prime numbers increases over
> the journey through integers. 1 is the logical starting point,
> and so it is added. This is the very spirit of primality. However
> this may be the rantings of
* Robin Houston ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
i was actually being a little bit serious, albeit i used a bit of
poetic license, with the horse riding analogy.
however 1 does expose the artificial nature of primes
>
> There's no reason you can't say that 1 is prime if you like though.
> (What do y
Simon Wistow sent the following bits through the ether:
> Well ladies and germs, time for London Perl Mongers mailing list summary
> numero seven for the week starting 2001-02-26.
Great! Many thanks to Simon! Let's all buy him a beer at the weekly
london.pm meet ;-)
> Leon is away talking at th
At Fri 02/03/01 18:19, Greg (quoting Simon) said:
> > Getting back on topic, Dave Cross (again, the bitch)
> > noticed that a 8uffy (who is london.pm's bitch) episode received
> > complaints because it was too sexually explicit. Using their
> > ph34r50m3 8uffy 5k177z various members of the list
On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 03:33:55AM -0500, Dave Cross wrote:
Good job I saw the time zone on that before I witticized.
> Actually, following some weekend research on alt.sad.buffy.fans, I now
> know that the episode in question wasn't "The Zeppo" as suggested, but
> "The Harsh Light Of Day". This
Dominic Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Which would make me less peeved if I didn't know someone at work who has
> NTL cable TV in the road above me. *thud*
Wireless network?
--
Dave Hodgkinson, http://www.hodgkinson.org
Editor-in-chief, The Highway Star
On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 12:01:08PM +, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
> Dominic Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Which would make me less peeved if I didn't know someone at work who has
> > NTL cable TV in the road above me. *thud*
>
> Wireless network?
No he's on cable, and I'm in a basemen
11 matches
Mail list logo
