On Saturday, June 30, 2001, at 01:22 AM, Natalie Ford wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 07:09:17PM +0200, Marcel Grunauer wrote:
I've done a web page with information and links to Perl 5 modules
that may be of interest to those discussing and implementing the
Perl 6 language. Some of them are
On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 08:59:27AM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
* Matthew Byng-Maddick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 12:41:03PM -0700, Paul Makepeace wrote:
15%. Suspiciously C/C++ is at 21%. WhoTF uses C/C++ to develop
web apps??
At least one of the places I
- Original Message -
From: Paul Makepeace [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 June 2001 01:52
Subject: Re: Website: no longer fixed width
On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 12:17:20AM +0100, Natalie Ford wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 11:03:20AM +0100, Paul Mison wrote:
As
Natalie Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 11:03:20AM +0100, Paul Mison wrote:
As threatened, I've changed the london.pm.org top and bottom wrappers
so that they're no longer fixed to a single width.
Well, I have just taken a look at http://london.pm.org/ in Galeon[1]
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Paul Makepeace wrote:
Anyone here hack Python? :-)
Ask gnat
http://use.perl.org/journal.pl?op=displayuid=29
Later.
Mark.
--
s'' Mark Fowler London.pm Bath.pm
http://www.twoshortplanks.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Cross David - dcross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quiet here today. Or is my mail sever just broken? Here's a nice Friday
afternoon topic for you all to discuss:
The new design of http://www.perl.com - good or bad?
O'Reilly going for the corporate design look. I suppose it's their attempt
to get
Jonathan Stowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I believe that this was mooted as a possibility when I had the DNS changed
to point at penderel in the first place. It does make sense so we can
mess around with our zone without troubling [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is penderel up
for the gig of serving DNS
On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 09:49:25AM +, Steve Mynott wrote:
Jonathan Stowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I believe that this was mooted as a possibility when I had the DNS changed
to point at penderel in the first place. It does make sense so we can
mess around with our zone without
On 29/06/2001 at 18:14 +0100, Paul Makepeace wrote:
e.g.,
[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
/me apologises for not having Mutt-esque sendhook groovyness.
I suppose it wouldn't be a problem if I remembered. (Mind you, if I'm
not the only person this is aimed at, it's not quite as
Meta-reply; sorry, a bit long. (Yes, I know it'll break threads too.
Bad me.)
On 30/06/2001 at 01:52 +0100, Paul Makepeace wrote:
On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 12:17:20AM +0100, Natalie Ford wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 11:03:20AM +0100, Paul Mison wrote:
As threatened, I've changed the
On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 02:10:44PM +0100, Paul Mison wrote:
On 30/06/2001 at 01:52 +0100, Paul Makepeace wrote:
On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 12:17:20AM +0100, Natalie Ford wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 11:03:20AM +0100, Paul Mison wrote:
As threatened, I've changed the london.pm.org top and
On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 10:39:51AM +0100, Jonathan Stowe wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Paul Makepeace wrote:
muse class=idleIt would be nice is london.pm.org had its own NS
record.../muse
I believe that this was mooted as a possibility when I had the DNS changed
to point at penderel in
12 matches
Mail list logo
