On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 02:10:44PM +0100, Paul Mison wrote:
> On 30/06/2001 at 01:52 +0100, Paul Makepeace wrote:
> >On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 12:17:20AM +0100, Natalie Ford wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 11:03:20AM +0100, Paul Mison wrote:
> >> > As threatened, I've changed the london.pm.org top and bottom wrappers
> >> > so that they're no longer fixed to a single width.
> >>
> >> Well, I have just taken a look at http://london.pm.org/ in Galeon[1]
> >>under
> >> XWindows in a 640 wide window (some displays are still 640x480) and
> >>I can't
> Leo hasn't applied the changes yet- since I originally mailed him
> @london.pm.org it got caught up in Friday's outage.
> Please check the version(s) at http://husk.org/perl/site/ and join the
> campaign against fixed-width badness!
Way better! :))))))
> What if (like me) you have a 1024x768 (or bigger) display, but choose
> to have 600-odd pixel wide browser windows? Why should I have to resize
> *my* browser for *you*?
My point exactly! :)
> What if you like your ancient little LC enough to keep that in your
> bedroom? As it's so little effort to fix, why not Just Do It? (See
> above :)
Another great point! :))))
-----
Natalie Ford
Iterative Software Ltd. http://www.iterative-software.com/
Yet Another Computer Solutions Company Ltd. http://www.yacsc.com/
