Dave and Religion

2003-09-05 Thread James Campbell
I was reading Mr Cantrell's Free Press and was very amused and impressed by the section on Religion. http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david/religion/ It reminded me of a long run of visits I had from some JW's when I was doing my finals in 1997 (a man needs some distraction when studying and I hadn't

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-05 Thread Greg McCarroll
* James Campbell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: When it comes to religion I think Hitler had some interesting ideas. Note to self - write Acme::Siesta::Plugin::GodwinsLaw Greg -- Greg McCarroll http://www.mccarroll.org.uk/~gem/ jabber://

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-05 Thread Jonathan Peterson
> > > When it comes to religion I think Hitler had some interesting ideas. Love it :-) What a nice generic way to end arguments before they've started :-)

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-05 Thread Jonathan Peterson
> It reminded me of a long run of visits I had from some JW's when I was > doing my finals in 1997 (a man needs some distraction when studying and I > hadn't found Perl then... Oh, and the woman was a babe). They wanted to > convert me to Christianity and I wanted to convert them to Atheism. Seem

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-05 Thread Paul Mison
On 05/09/2003 at 12:54 +0100, Jonathan Peterson wrote: When it comes to religion I think Hitler had some interesting ideas. Love it :-) What a nice generic way to end arguments before they've started :-) It would be if he understood what Godwin's Law actually said. http://www.faqs.org/faqs/use

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-05 Thread Tim Sweetman
Jonathan Peterson wrote: P.S. The play Jumpers by Stoppard is on at the NT right now. Deals with just this topic in a highly clever and amusing way. Natch clever and amusing (and probably incomprehensible without several degrees and as-yet-undeveloped hypermedia technology), it's Tom Stoppard. H

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-05 Thread James Campbell
Er, who was it who said "If you educate people without religion you create clever little devils"? I don't think I dreamt it. James =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= James Campbell Research Bioinformatician Proteome Sciences Institute of Psychiatry South Wing Lab PO BOX P045 16 De Crespigny Park

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-05 Thread Paul Makepeace
Je 2003-09-05 14:37:02 +0100, James Campbell skribis: > Er, who was it who said "If you educate people without religion you create > clever little devils"? Perhaps the world's scriptures are lacking in advocating basic search engine usage. http://www.princeton.edu/~gcu/quotes.htm ("Arthur Wellesl

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-05 Thread alex
Je 2003-09-05 14:37:02 +0100, James Campbell skribis: > Er, who was it who said "If you educate people without religion you create > clever little devils"? I was going to say that it was first on the list of google results but Paul beat me to it. How can devils exist without religion? Ob buffy.

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-05 Thread James Campbell
>("Arthur Wellesley was the Duke of Wellington") Thanks >How can devils exist without religion? Quite!

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-05 Thread Andy Wardley
James Campbell wrote: > "If God created the universe, who created God?" God didn't create the universe. God is the universe. That's about the only thing that all the religious texts can agree on - that "God", or whatever name you chose for the concept, is omniprescient and omnipotent. This i

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-05 Thread Lusercop
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 01:13:06PM +0100, Paul Mison wrote: > On 05/09/2003 at 12:54 +0100, Jonathan Peterson wrote: > >> > >> When it comes to religion I think Hitler had some interesting ideas. Of course, the correct way to do this is: | When it comes to religion, I think Hitler had some inter

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-05 Thread Iain Tatch
On Friday, September 5, 2003, 3:50:07 PM, Andy Wardley wrote: AW> James Campbell wrote: >> "If God created the universe, who created God?" AW> God didn't create the universe. God is the universe. AW> That's about the only thing that all the religious texts can agree on - AW> that "God", or w

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-05 Thread Phil Lanch
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 01:02:52PM +0100, Jonathan Peterson wrote: > > "If God created the universe, who created God?" > > > > That's one of the more interesting questions. The medieval theologians > charactarised God as the 'prime mover', i.e. the first in a causal chain > of events. It's not

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-05 Thread Jason Clifford
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Iain Tatch wrote: > Only in Monotheistic religions, and the only one of those that's got any > substantial following in this country is Judaism. One of my favourite > Christian-baiting tactics (when I'm in that sort of mood) is to put > forward my proposition that they have a p

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-05 Thread Paul Makepeace
Je 2003-09-05 16:06:15 +0100, Iain Tatch skribis: > Only in Monotheistic religions, and the only one of those that's got > any substantial following in this country is Judaism. What country? Perhaps you were misled into thinking this list is populated entirely by Brits... 'Fraid not, the Empire ha

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-05 Thread Phil Lanch
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 04:31:37PM +0100, Paul Makepeace wrote: > Je 2003-09-05 16:06:15 +0100, Iain Tatch skribis: > > Only in Monotheistic religions, and the only one of those that's got > > any substantial following in this country is Judaism. i don't know what modern Judaism says about it, but

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-05 Thread James Campbell
Oh Christ! What have I done... James

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-05 Thread Iain Tatch
On Friday, September 5, 2003, 4:31:37 PM, Paul Makepeace wrote: PM> Islam is quite a popular monotheistic religion in the UK, six times more PM> so than Judaism in England. Islam, monotheistic? You really think so? -- Iain | PGP mail preferred: pubkey @ www.deepsea.f9.co.uk/misc/iain.asc ($=,$

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-05 Thread Phil Lanch
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 01:29:02PM +0100, Tim Sweetman wrote: > all. At which point I want to throw the following at Mr Stoppard, but I > don't have a time machine: Mr Stoppard is alive and well. -- Phil Lanch0xD78D598DA6635CF32AB24593C98994B7D95B33E3

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-05 Thread Iain Tatch
On Friday, September 5, 2003, 4:34:16 PM, Jason Clifford wrote: >> Then you've got a couple of other major deities such as the Virgin Mary >> (especially revered in Catholicism) and Satan, and a host of minor gods >> who they usually name "saints". JC> Neither is a God. Mary is human and that's i

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-05 Thread Paul Makepeace
Je 2003-09-05 16:54:30 +0100, Iain Tatch skribis: > On Friday, September 5, 2003, 4:31:37 PM, Paul Makepeace wrote: > > PM> Islam is quite a popular monotheistic religion in the UK, six times more > PM> so than Judaism in England. > > Islam, monotheistic? > > You really think so? Jeez, come on

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-05 Thread James Campbell
Andy Wardley wrote: >God didn't create the universe. God is the universe. Yeah, but what created God? James (who is definately going to hell for this)

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-05 Thread Jason Clifford
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Iain Tatch wrote: > If he / she / it is worshipped, then regardless of what name they're > given, I still maintain it's a god. While some people fall into that trap there are not many Catholics who worshop Mary at all. Certainly the official position of the Church is that d

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-05 Thread Tim Sweetman
Phil Lanch wrote: On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 01:29:02PM +0100, Tim Sweetman wrote: all. At which point I want to throw the following at Mr Stoppard, but I don't have a time machine: Mr Stoppard is alive and well. I know that, but the sources in question postdate "Jumpers". Talented as Mr Stoppard i

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-05 Thread Jonathan Peterson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 05/09/2003 16:06:15: > On Friday, September 5, 2003, 3:50:07 PM, Andy Wardley wrote: > > AW> James Campbell wrote: > >> "If God created the universe, who created God?" > > AW> God didn't create the universe. God is the universe. > > Only in Monotheistic religions,

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-05 Thread Robin Berjon
Jason Clifford wrote: On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Iain Tatch wrote: If he / she / it is worshipped, then regardless of what name they're given, I still maintain it's a god. While some people fall into that trap there are not many Catholics who worshop Mary at all. Certainly the official position of the C

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-05 Thread Jason Clifford
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Robin Berjon wrote: > You are being presented an external view yet answer with theology -- theology is > of little importance to the external eye. The old Egyptian/Kemetic religion is > often called polytheistic, when in fact their theology claims that there is only > one Di

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-05 Thread Simon Wilcox
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Jason Clifford wrote: > She's no more a God than Madonna is. Do those who adore Madonna generally > do so as a god? I dunno. Is Guy Richie subbed to the list ? S.

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-05 Thread Paul Mison
On 05/09/2003 at 18:29 +0200, Robin Berjon wrote: Jason Clifford wrote: She's no more a God than Madonna is. Do those who adore Madonna generally do so as a god? Dunno. She sure looks good in some of those leather outfits. On the other hand, in the latest video she really manages to look her ag

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-05 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 12:35:47PM +0100, James Campbell wrote: > I was reading Mr Cantrell's Free Press and was very amused and impressed by > the section on Religion. . . . > Uh-oh, is that a massive bolt of... What has this got to do with Ben's message on "Bad C Source"? Just curious. Nichol

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-05 Thread David Cantrell
James Campbell wrote: I was reading Mr Cantrell's Free Press and was very amused and impressed by the section on Religion. http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david/religion/ And it's due for a re-write. It's been due for a re-write for ages, but I just can't be bothered. Most of the content there is

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-05 Thread Iain Tatch
On Friday, September 5, 2003, 5:08:00 PM, Paul Makepeace wrote: PM> http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/islam/features/beginner/index.shtml PM> ``You have to believe that there is only one God, Allah, who created the PM> entire universe, and that Muhammad (peace be upon him) is his final PM>

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-05 Thread Paul Sharpe
Nicholas Clark wrote: On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 12:35:47PM +0100, James Campbell wrote: I was reading Mr Cantrell's Free Press and was very amused and impressed by the section on Religion. . . . Uh-oh, is that a massive bolt of... What has this got to do with Ben's message on "Bad C Source"? Ju

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-05 Thread Robin Berjon
Paul Mison wrote: On 05/09/2003 at 18:29 +0200, Robin Berjon wrote: Jason Clifford wrote: She's no more a God than Madonna is. Do those who adore Madonna generally do so as a god? Dunno. She sure looks good in some of those leather outfits. On the other hand, in the latest video she really manage

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-05 Thread Andy Wardley
Andy Wardley wrote: > That's about the only thing that all the religious texts can agree on - > that "God", or whatever name you chose for the concept, is omniprescient > and omnipotent. This implies that God is everywhere and in everything and > there can be nothing that is "outside of God". I

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-05 Thread Tony Bowden
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 04:34:16PM +0100, Jason Clifford wrote: > Christianity is a derived form of Judaism. It teaches that there is one > God and that's it. Not quite. It teaches that YHWH is the only *true* God, but the Hebrew Scriptures are full of stories of other gods. Tony

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-05 Thread Andy Wardley
I wrote: > God didn't create the universe. God is the universe. James Campbell wrote: > Yeah, but what created God? God's parents of course, Mr and Mrs God. A

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-05 Thread David Cantrell
Jason Clifford wrote: On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Robin Berjon wrote: Dunno. She sure looks good in some of those leather outfits. A god of slaughtered cows? ;) Nah, radiocative decay. A cowium atom decays into several steakiums and some leatherium, plus a handful of neutrinos, a loud moo and some blood.

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-05 Thread Robin Berjon
Andy Wardley wrote: In fact, I wasn't being entirely serious. Well, half-serious. I like my definition of God == Universe because it works for me. But the whole point of religion/spirituality/belief is that it is entirely personal. It should be based on your own beliefs, not on what anyone else

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-05 Thread Michel Rodriguez
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, David Cantrell wrote: > Furrfu, why do people have to keep inventing deities for perfectly > simple natural processes? And why isn't there a God Of Having A Really > Big Dump, You Know, The Ones Where You Just Have To Get It Out But > Strain And Strain As Much As You Like It J

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-05 Thread muppet
On Friday, September 5, 2003, at 11:39 AM, Jonathan Peterson wrote: Hence also the central tenet 'There is no God but God'. and here all this time i thought it went "the tao that can be named is not the true tao." /me ducks It's worth remembering that most of the saints were created in Christ

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-05 Thread muppet
On Friday, September 5, 2003, at 12:42 PM, Jason Clifford wrote: How often are stereotypes correct? rather often. it's how they become stereotypes, you know. ;-)

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-06 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 10:47:13AM -0700, Paul Sharpe wrote: > Nicholas Clark wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 12:35:47PM +0100, James Campbell wrote: > > > >>I was reading Mr Cantrell's Free Press and was very amused and impressed by > >>the section on Religion. > > > > . > > . > > . > >

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-06 Thread Earle Martin
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 04:34:16PM +0100, Jason Clifford wrote: > > For a start there's the three they get into enough trouble with just by > > admitting their existence: God, Jesus, the Holy Spirit (whatever that is). > > One being - three persons. It's funny how everyone forgets that there are

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-06 Thread Earle Martin
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 06:35:29PM +0100, Iain Tatch wrote: > I know what Muslims believe, and what the Koran teaches. However just > because someone utters a statement such as "There is no God but Allah. The > Prophets merely carry his word" doesn't mean that they aren't treating the > Prophets in

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-06 Thread Jason Clifford
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003, Earle Martin wrote: > > > For a start there's the three they get into enough trouble with just by > > > admitting their existence: God, Jesus, the Holy Spirit (whatever that is). > > > > One being - three persons. > > It's funny how everyone forgets that there are actually br

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-06 Thread Earle Martin
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 04:01:14PM +0100, Jason Clifford wrote: > > It's funny how everyone forgets that there are actually branches of > > Christianity that *don't* believe in the trinitarian doctrine. > > Which ones and what do they believe? More than I ever knew about the subject: http://www.

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-06 Thread Jason Clifford
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003, Earle Martin wrote: > More than I ever knew about the subject: > > http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unitarianism > > I count myself as a Unitarian Universalist. > > http://www.uua.org/aboutuu/uufaq.html Of the two urls the second seemed to contain more answers whereas the fir

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-08 Thread Rafael Garcia-Suarez
Jason Clifford wrote: > > Christianity is a derived form of Judaism. It teaches that there is one > God and that's it. Nope -- Christianity is a derived form of Zorostrianism, with a few Judaic influences, since Jesus was Jew. Note that Judaism was itself heavily influenced by Zorostrianism, es

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-08 Thread Elaine -HFB- Ashton
Rafael Garcia-Suarez [EMAIL PROTECTED] quoth: *> - that circle of light behind the head of saints (what's the english *> word ?) Halo or nimbus :) e.

Re: Dave and Religion

2003-09-08 Thread David Cantrell
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 04:12:49AM -0500, Elaine -HFB- Ashton wrote: > Rafael Garcia-Suarez [EMAIL PROTECTED] quoth: > *> - that circle of light behind the head of saints (what's the english > *> word ?) > Halo or nimbus :) The difference being, IIRC, that a halo is a simple ring, a nimbus has s

Re: Dave and Religion - Inventing Deities

2003-09-05 Thread Nigel Hamilton
> Furrfu, why do people have to keep inventing deities for perfectly > simple natural processes? And why isn't there a God Of Having A Really > Big Dump, You Know, The Ones Where You Just Have To Get It Out But > Strain And Strain As Much As You Like It Just Doesn't Want To Move? > Talking a

Re: Dave and Religion - Inventing Deities

2003-09-06 Thread Earle Martin
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 02:56:23PM -0500, Nigel Hamilton wrote: > If you happened to mention the Great Lord's Name, 'Kibo', in your Usenet > post, you might be blessed with a reply from the Great Lord himself! AFAIK I have a Kibo Number[0] of 2. Surely someone here can beat that? [0] http://c2.co