Hi Les and other authors,
I didn’t see a reply to Murray’s comment. It’s not a DISCUSS so not mandatory
for you to reply but it would be appreciated.
Of Murray’s comments, I personally don’t think RFC 7981 needs to be normative,
the test being that if you never looked at 7981 you’d still know h
V6 of the draft has been posted with the changes agreed upon w Alvaro.
AFAIK all outstanding comments have been addressed - please let me know if any
further changes are required.
Les
> -Original Message-
> From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 10:42 AM
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF.
Title : IS-IS Extensions in Support of Inter-Autonomous
System (AS) MPLS and GMPLS Traffic Engineering
Authors :
Alvaro -
> -Original Message-
> From: Alvaro Retana
> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 10:28 AM
> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; The IESG
> Cc: Paul Wouters ; cho...@chopps.org; lsr-
> cha...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316...@ietf.org; Eric Vyncke
> (evyncke)
> ; lsr@ietf.org; Ro
On September 26, 2022 at 5:17:12 PM, Les Ginsberg wrote:
Les:
The text you proposed is...ok. Just one minor comment: the router ID
doesn't have to be "globally unique", just unique within the IS-IS
domain. I'll clear my DISCUSS.
I'm disappointed that the resulting recommendation is driven by
