Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv-01.txt

"Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" writes: Tony - Your summarization is incorrect. The proposal is to advertise a advisory message that indicates that a node is ready to receive MP-TLVs. It prohibits nothing. [LES:] That is what you are proposing - but others in the thread have proposed other

Re: [Lsr] RFC 8362 and LSInfinity

Hi Peter, Ketan, We’ll do another WG last call on the updated IP Flex Algo document and it will update RFC 8362. As you probably surmised, this is useful for OSPFv3 IP Flex Algorithm when you want don’t want to use the prefix with the base algorithm. From: Lsr on behalf of Ketan Talaulikar

[Lsr] Protocol Action: 'Advertising Layer 2 Bundle Member Link Attributes in OSPF' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-l2bundles-10.txt)

The IESG has approved the following document: - 'Advertising Layer 2 Bundle Member Link Attributes in OSPF' (draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-l2bundles-10.txt) as Proposed Standard This document is the product of the Link State Routing Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Alvaro Retana, Andrew

[Lsr] Protocol Action: 'IGP Flexible Algorithm' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-25.txt)

The IESG has approved the following document: - 'IGP Flexible Algorithm' (draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-25.txt) as Proposed Standard This document is the product of the Link State Routing Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Alvaro Retana, Andrew Alston and John Scudder. A URL of this

Re: [Lsr] Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-l2bundles-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi All, The update has been posted: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-l2bundles-10 Thanks, Ketan On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 2:21 PM Ketan Talaulikar wrote: > Hi All, > > Following is the updated text proposal for the part of the IANA section > under discussion: > >

[Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-l2bundles-10.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF. Title : Advertising Layer 2 Bundle Member Link Attributes in OSPF Authors : Ketan Talaulikar

Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv-01.txt

Hi Acee, > You realize the latest version still has the statement: > >If all routers in an area advertise the Multi-part TLV Capability a >node MAY advertise multi-part TLVs to increase space for payload >values, unless otherwise specified by the TLV. > > At a minimum, the draft

Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv-01.txt

Hi Tony, From: Lsr on behalf of Tony Li Date: Friday, October 7, 2022 at 11:21 AM To: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" Cc: Christian Hopps , "Peter Psenak (ppsenak)" , Robert Raszuk , Henk Smit , "lsr@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv-01.txt

Re: [Lsr] Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-reverse-metric-09: (with DISCUSS)

Hi Rob, We have posted a further update: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-reverse-metric-11 Please let us know if further updates or clarifications are needed to address your DISCUSS and comments. Thanks, Ketan On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 8:32 PM Ketan Talaulikar wrote:

Re: [Lsr] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-reverse-metric-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi Alvaro, I've just posted the update with changes to address your remaining comments (as also Martin's): https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-reverse-metric-11 Thanks, Ketan On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 8:33 PM Ketan Talaulikar wrote: > Hi Alvaro, > > We've posted an update

[Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-reverse-metric-11.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF. Title : OSPF Reverse Metric Authors : Ketan Talaulikar Peter Psenak

Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv-01.txt

Les, > On Oct 7, 2022, at 8:16 AM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) > wrote: > > What I am trying to highlight is that the existing implementations of MP-TLVs > for the "implicit" cases should not be penalized for sending MP-TLVs that are > encoded consistent with how MP-TLVs for the "explicit"

Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv-01.txt

Tony - > > Your summarization is incorrect. > > The proposal is to advertise a advisory message that indicates that a node is > ready to receive MP-TLVs. It prohibits nothing. [LES:] That is what you are proposing - but others in the thread have proposed other ideas. For example, in an

Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv-01.txt

> On Oct 6, 2022, at 1:56 PM, Christian Hopps wrote: > > Tony I think you may have interpreted these differently? Ayup. As stated, I am human. I blew it. Mea culpa. I will rename the current columns and start over. Contributors still welcome. T

Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv-01.txt

Les, > On Oct 6, 2022, at 7:22 PM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) > wrote: > > Chris - > > Not trying to convince you of anything - just want to step back and summarize > where we are. > > MP-TLV support has been explicitly allowed in multiple cases - and in these > cases no additional

Re: [Lsr] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-reverse-metric-10: (with COMMENT)

Hi Martin, Thanks again for your review and helpful suggestions. I am working with Alvaro and will post the update once ready. Thanks Ketan On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 5:23 AM Martin Duke via Datatracker wrote: > Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for >

Re: [Lsr] Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-l2bundles-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi All, Following is the updated text proposal for the part of the IANA section under discussion: IANA is requested to introduce a column "Applicability to L2 Bundle Member sub-TLV" (abbreviated as L2BM) in the registry tables for the "OSPFv2 Extended Link TLV Sub-TLVs" registry with