sday, May 19, 2021 6:55 AM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Acee Lindem (acee)
; Peter Psenak (ppsenak) ; John
Scudder
Cc: John Scudder via Datatracker ; draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-
extensi...@ietf.org; Christian Hopps ; lsr-
cha...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org; The IESG
Subject: RE: John Scudder's No Objecti
acee)
> ; Peter Psenak (ppsenak) ; John
> Scudder
> Cc: John Scudder via Datatracker ; draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-
> extensi...@ietf.org; Christian Hopps ; lsr-
> cha...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org; The IESG
> Subject: RE: John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-
> exte
Les:
Hi!
In this case the name is being changed, a new column is added, and all
the existing code points are updated in light of the new column.
I realize this may not be enough for you. Instead of all of us
discussing this specific case, we should focus our energy on clearly
defining what
ietf.org;
The IESG ; Christian Hopps
Subject: Re: John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-
extensions-14: (with COMMENT)
Hi Peter,
On 5/17/21, 9:07 AM, "Peter Psenak" wrote:
Hi Acee,
On 17/05/2021 14:56, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
> Hi John,
>
gt; *Date: *Monday, May 17, 2021 at 8:48 AM
> > *To: *Acee Lindem
> > *Cc: *Alvaro Retana , "Les Ginsberg
> (ginsberg)"
> > , "Peter Psenak (ppsenak)"
> , John
> > Scudder via Datatracker ,
> > "draft-ietf-lsr-isis-
t; *To: *"Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" , "Peter Psenak
> (ppsenak)" , John Scudder
>
> *Cc: *John Scudder via Datatracker ,
> "draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensi...@ietf.org"
> , "lsr@ietf.org"
>
sberg (ginsberg)"
, "Peter Psenak (ppsenak)" , John
Scudder via Datatracker ,
"draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensi...@ietf.org"
, "lsr@ietf.org"
, "lsr-cha...@ietf.org" , The IESG
, Christian Hopps
*Subject: *Re: John Scudder's No Objection on
dra
Hi John,
thanks for your comments, please see inline (##PP):
On 13/05/2021 17:43, John Scudder via Datatracker wrote:
John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-14: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply
;draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensi...@ietf.org"
, "lsr@ietf.org" ,
"lsr-cha...@ietf.org" , The IESG ,
Christian Hopps
Subject: Re: John Scudder's No Objection on
draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-14: (with COMMENT)
Acee,
I think you are saying you prefer to remove the “u
;lsr-cha...@ietf.org" , The IESG ,
Christian Hopps
Subject: Re: John Scudder's No Objection on
draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-14: (with COMMENT)
Resent-From:
Resent-To: Yingzhen Qu , Christian Hopps
, Acee Lindem
Resent-Date: Monday, May 17, 2021 at 6:54 AM
Peter:
Hi!
As John mentione
r@ietf.org" ,
"lsr-cha...@ietf.org" , The IESG ,
Christian Hopps
Subject: Re: John Scudder's No Objection on
draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-14: (with COMMENT)
Resent-From:
Resent-To: Yingzhen Qu , Christian Hopps
, Acee Lindem
Resent-Date: Monday, May 17, 2021 at 6:54 AM
Peter:
ay 13, 2021 11:00 AM
> *To:* Alvaro Retana
> *Cc:* John Scudder via Datatracker ; Christian Hopps
> ; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; The IESG ;
> draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensi...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Lsr] John Scudder's No Objection on
> draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions
@ietf.org
*Subject:* Re: [Lsr] John Scudder's No Objection on
draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-14: (with COMMENT)
On May 13, 2021, at 1:20 PM, Alvaro Retana mailto:aretana.i...@gmail.com>> wrote:
This documents updates RFC 7370 by modifying an existing
re
Datatracker ; Christian Hopps
; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; The IESG ;
draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensi...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] John Scudder's No Objection on
draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-14: (with COMMENT)
On May 13, 2021, at 1:20 PM, Alvaro Retana
mailto:aretana.i
On May 13, 2021, at 1:20 PM, Alvaro Retana
mailto:aretana.i...@gmail.com>> wrote:
This documents updates RFC 7370 by modifying an existing registry.
Also, this doesn’t seem to me like an update to RFC 7370. It’s normal for an
RFC to update an IANA registry, without saying it updates a
On May 13, 2021 at 11:44:44 AM, John Scudder wrote:
John:
Hi!
Thanks for the review!
Just replying to one of your comments:
...
> This documents updates RFC 7370 by modifying an existing registry.
>
> Also, this doesn’t seem to me like an update to RFC 7370. It’s normal for an
> RFC to
John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-14: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
17 matches
Mail list logo
