ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ron Bonica
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2020 3:38 PM
To: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: [Lsr] FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-lsr-ip-
flexalgo-
00.txt
Please review and comment
Ron
Juniper Business Use Only
-Original
>> (i.e.
> no
> >> magic).
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> --Bruno
> >>>
> >>> [1] aka "Sub-TLVs for TLVs 135, 235, 236, and 237 (Extended IP
> reachability,
> >> MT IP. Reach, IPv6 IP. Reach, and MT I
6 IP. Reach TLVs)"
-Original Message-
From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ron Bonica
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2020 3:38 PM
To: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: [Lsr] FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-lsr-ip-
flexalgo-
00.txt
Please review and commen
ior is the same (i.e.
> no
> magic).
> >
> > Regards,
> > --Bruno
> >
> > [1] aka "Sub-TLVs for TLVs 135, 235, 236, and 237 (Extended IP reachability,
> MT IP. Reach, IPv6 IP. Reach, and MT IPv6 IP. Reach TLVs)"
> >
> >
> >>
eachability, MT IP.
Reach, IPv6 IP. Reach, and MT IPv6 IP. Reach TLVs)"
-Original Message-
From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ron Bonica
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2020 3:38 PM
To: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: [Lsr] FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-lsr
Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ron Bonica
> Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2020 3:38 PM
> To: lsr@ietf.org
> Subject: [Lsr] FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-
> 00.txt
>
>
> Please review and comment
>
>
, September 29, 2020 10:05 AM
To: Ron Bonica
Cc: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for
draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-00.txt
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
Ron,
This is nice. It makes it clear that constraint based path computation need not
have MPLS overhead for those
Subject: RE: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-00.txt
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
Ron -
Interesting proposal.
A few mundane - but I think still important - comments.
New IS-IS TLVs
There is no need to have two TLVs for each address
t;mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org>>
> > <mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org
<mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org> <mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org
<mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org>>>]
> On Behalf Of Joel M. Halpern
> > Sent: Wednesd
y, September 29, 2020 6:38 AM
> To: lsr@ietf.org
> Subject: [Lsr] FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-
> 00.txt
>
>
> Please review and comment
>
>Ron
>
>
>
> Juniper Business Use Only
>
t; For details about the method defined in RFC 6550. It
> > uses the
> > > HBH option to carry the RPLInstaceID. The RPLInstaceID and
> > > FlexAlgoID are similar.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> >
.@ietf.org <mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org>>]
On Behalf Of Joel M. Halpern
> Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2020 12:05 PM
> Cc: lsr@ietf.org <mailto:lsr@ietf.org> <mailto:lsr@ietf.org
<mailto:lsr@ietf.org>>
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] New Vers
: Wednesday, September 30, 2020 3:28 PM
To: Huzhibo mailto:huzh...@huawei.com>>
Cc: lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org>; Joel M. Halpern
mailto:j...@joelhalpern.com>>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for
draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-00.txt
Hi,
> It uses the HBH op
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Zhibo
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org
> > <mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org>] On Behalf Of Joel M. Halpern
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2020 12:05
lto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org
<mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org>] On Behalf Of Joel M. Halpern
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2020 12:05 PM
Cc: lsr@ietf.org <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for
draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-00.txt
I am missing some
0 10:05 PM
To: Ron Bonica
Cc: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for
draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-00.txt
Ron,
This is nice. It makes it clear that constraint based path computation need not
have MPLS overhead for those that don’t want it.
One thing that you don’t talk ab
;
> Zhibo
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Joel M. Halpern
> Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2020 12:05 PM
> Cc: lsr@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for
> draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-00.txt
>
&
, September 30, 2020 12:05 PM
Cc: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for
draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-00.txt
I am missing something in this discussion of multiple algorithms.
My understanding of flex-algo whether for MPLS, SRv6, SRH, or IPv6, is that you
need to associated
th a given prefix.
Thanks
ZHibo
-Original Message-
From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of tony...@tony.li
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2020 10:05 PM
To: Ron Bonica
Cc: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for
draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-00.txt
Ron,
Th
[mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of tony...@tony.li
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2020 10:05 PM
To: Ron Bonica
Cc: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for
draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-00.txt
Ron,
This is nice. It makes it clear that constraint based path computation need
; From: internet-dra...@ietf.org
> >> Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2020 9:36 AM
> >> To: Parag Kaneriya ; Shraddha Hegde
> >> ; Ron Bonica ; Rajesh M
> >> ; William Britto A J
> >> Subject: New Version Notification for
> draft-bonica-lsr-ip-fle
mber 29, 2020 9:36 AM
>> To: Parag Kaneriya ; Shraddha Hegde
>> ; Ron Bonica ; Rajesh M
>> ; William Britto A J
>> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-00.txt
>>
>> [External Email. Be cautious of content]
>>
>>
>>
22 matches
Mail list logo
