g)
> mailto:ginsberg=40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org>>;
> lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for draft-ginsberg-lsr-rfc8919bis-
> 01.txt
>
> Les,
>
> Pls see inline [SH2]
>
>
> Juniper Business Use Onl
Shraddha -
Please see {LES2:] inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: Lsr On Behalf Of Shraddha Hegde
> Sent: Monday, July 18, 2022 2:16 AM
> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ;
> lsr@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for draft-ginsberg-lsr-rfc
e..
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Juniper Business Use Only
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Lsr On Behalf Of Les Ginsberg
> > (ginsberg)
> > Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2022 2:32 AM
> > To: Shraddha Hegde ;
> > lsr@ietf.org
txt
> >
> > Les,
> >
> > Thanks for the reply. Pls see inline..
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Juniper Business Use Only
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Lsr On Behalf Of Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
> > Sent: Thursday,
> lsr@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for
> draft-ginsberg-lsr-rfc8919bis- 01.txt
>
> [External Email. Be cautious of content]
>
>
> Shraddha -
>
> Thanx for your review and comments.
> Responses inline.
>
> > -Original Message---
Les,
>
> Thanks for the reply. Pls see inline..
>
>
>
>
>
> Juniper Business Use Only
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Lsr On Behalf Of Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
> Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2022 2:32 AM
> To: Shraddha Hegde ; lsr@ietf.org
>
Les,
Thanks for the reply. Pls see inline..
Juniper Business Use Only
-Original Message-
From: Lsr On Behalf Of Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2022 2:32 AM
To: Shraddha Hegde ; lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for
draft-ginsberg-lsr
e
> *Cc:* Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; lsr@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for
> draft-ginsberg-lsr-rfc8919bis-01.txt
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> Yes I very much support Shraddha's msg.
>
>
>
> The term "application" should not ev
the scope of a document so long as we have a clear definition
– which we do.
Les
From: Robert Raszuk
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2022 12:25 AM
To: Shraddha Hegde
Cc: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for
draft-ginsberg-lsr-rfc8919bis-01.txt
Shraddha -
Thanx for your review and comments.
Responses inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: Shraddha Hegde
> Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2022 10:52 PM
> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; lsr@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: New Version Notification for draft-ginsberg-lsr-rfc8919bis-01.txt
>
> Authors,
Hello,
Yes I very much support Shraddha's msg.
The term "application" should not even be (re)defined up front, but
completely removed from the document. Likewise ASLA should be renamed too.
I thought we had the agreement in subsequent documents to do so. Why not
fix it across the board ?
If we l
Authors,
Thanks for the bis version of RFC 8919 and the clarifying text on errata.
The issues raised with respect to the errata have been addressed well in the
bis version.
However, I believe that the bis version is also an opportunity for us to
address any other ambiguities and clarifications an
12 matches
Mail list logo
