Thanks, Mahesh.
> On Jul 27, 2021, at 3:52 PM, Mahesh Jethanandani
> wrote:
>
> The surgery that I performed on the draft, and can be seen in the attached
> files both as a diff and the full file was to remove the mpls-te module
> dependency from this draft. We should therefore at least not b
RFC Editor state is MISSREF, as part of cluster C336:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/cluster_info.php?cid=C336. If I’m untangling the
information there correctly, I think it’s blocked on (at least)
draft-ietf-teas-yang-te.
Was the surgery that Tom mentions, expected to clear it out of MISSREF? If s
Adding John (AD).
On Tuesday, July 27, 2021, 10:45:07 a.m. EDT, tom petch
wrote:
From: Reshad Rahman
Sent: 21 May 2021 00:03
FYI, Mahesh did the extraction of the mpls-te from draft-ietf-bfd-yang and it's
been submitted to the RFC Editor.
Two months have passed and I see no chan
From: Reshad Rahman
Sent: 21 May 2021 00:03
FYI, Mahesh did the extraction of the mpls-te from draft-ietf-bfd-yang and it's
been submitted to the RFC Editor.
Two months have passed and I see no change in the RFC Editor queue. Whatever
was done would appear to have been not enough. I was e
FYI, Mahesh did the extraction of the mpls-te from draft-ietf-bfd-yang and it's
been submitted to the RFC Editor.
Regards,
Reshad.
On 2021-03-22, 3:30 PM, "Rtg-bfd on behalf of Yingzhen Qu"
wrote:
Hi,
I also support the split of ietf-bfd-mpls-te module from the base BFD
module, s
Hi Reshad, et al,
I support the proposal to split the BFD YANG data model and move the TE
part of the model into a separate new document (working group or
individual, s suggested by WG Chairs).
Regards,
Greg
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 2:34 AM tom petch wrote:
>
>
> From: Rtg-bfd on behalf of Resh
+1
> On Mar 22, 2021, at 9:29 AM, Yingzhen Qu wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I also support the split of ietf-bfd-mpls-te module from the base BFD module,
> so modules like ietf-ospf and ietf-isis can progress.
>
> Thanks,
> Yingzhen
>
>> On Mar 22, 2021, at 2:33 AM, tom petch wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Fro
Hi,
I also support the split of ietf-bfd-mpls-te module from the base BFD module,
so modules like ietf-ospf and ietf-isis can progress.
Thanks,
Yingzhen
> On Mar 22, 2021, at 2:33 AM, tom petch wrote:
>
>
>
> From: Rtg-bfd on behalf of Reshad Rahman
>
> Sent: 19 March 2021 18:58
> To: rt
From: Rtg-bfd on behalf of Reshad Rahman
Sent: 19 March 2021 18:58
To: rtg-bfd@ietf. org
Subject: Draft minutes for BFD @ IETF110
BFD WG,
Draft minutes have been posted @
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-110-bfd/
Please provide comments to the list by April 2nd.
I support Acee's
