Now the Routing Directorate review is complete, I will request publication.
Thanks,
Acee
On 10/1/20, 11:32 AM, "Acee Lindem (acee)" wrote:
The WG last call has ended. All comments have been addressed or concluded.
There was considerable discussion regarding the requirement that alternate
The WG last call has ended. All comments have been addressed or concluded.
There was considerable discussion regarding the requirement that alternate link
metrics come from Application-Specific Link Attributes (ASLAs) and whether to
allow them from TE advertisements as well. The consensus was
dha
Hegde;olivier.dug...@orange.com;tony...@tony.li; Robert
Raszuk
Cc: Christian Hopps;draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo@ietf.org; Les Ginsberg
(ginsberg);lsr@ietf.org;lsr-...@ietf.org; Acee Lindem
(acee)
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo
Gunter,
On 03/09/2020 11:53, Van De Vel
20 12:02
> To: Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
> ; Selderslaghs, Rudy (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
> ; Shraddha Hegde ;
> olivier.dug...@orange.com; tony...@tony.li; Robert Raszuk
> Cc: Christian Hopps ;
> draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo....@ietf.org; Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
> ;
UST be used. The advertisement
>MUST indicate that it is usable by the Flex-Algorithm application.
>
>
> thanks,
> Peter
>
>
>
>> ========
>>
>>
>> Rgds
>> Shraddha
>>
>>
>> Juniper Business Use Only
>>
>>
@ietf.org;
Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; lsr@ietf.org;
lsr-...@ietf.org; Acee Lindem (acee)
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo
Hi Shraddha,
when documents get adopted by the WG when they are still subject to changes.
Based on WG feedback and implementation experience
y in a form of the AG or EAG that is used
> >> during Flex-Algorithm calculation, an Application Specific Link
> >> Attributes sub-TLV as described in [I-D.ietf-isis-te-app], or sub-TLV
> >> of Extended Link TLV as described in
> >> [I-D.iet
com; tony...@tony.li; Robert Raszuk
Cc: Christian Hopps ; draft-ietf-lsr-flex-
algo@ietf.org; Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
; lsr@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org;
Acee Lindem (acee)
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
Hi Shraddha
.org;
lsr-...@ietf.org; Acee Lindem (acee)
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
Hi Shraddha,
draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-00 was published May 15, 2018 (over two years ago).
It clearly stated:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://to
insberg (ginsberg) ; lsr@ietf.org;
lsr-...@ietf.org; Acee Lindem (acee)
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
Hi Shraddha,
On 03/09/2020 05:39, Shraddha Hegde wrote:
> Peter,
>
> In order to make the document clearer on this p
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Peter Psenak
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 2, 2020 2:43 PM
> > To: Shraddha Hegde ;
> olivier.dug...@orange.com; tony...@tony.li; Robert Raszuk
>
> > Cc: Christian Hopps ; draft-ietf-lsr-flex-
> algo@ietf.org; Le
.org; Acee Lindem
(acee)
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo
Gunter,
On 03/09/2020 11:53, Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) wrote:
Hi Peter, All,
Let me chime in.
When the L-bit is set in an ASLA TLV, then for all applications marked, indeed
only legacy attr
udy (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) ; Shraddha
Hegde ; olivier.dug...@orange.com; tony...@tony.li;
Robert Raszuk
Cc: Christian Hopps ; draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo@ietf.org;
Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; lsr@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org;
Acee Lindem (acee)
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-al
-flex-algo@ietf.org;
Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; lsr@ietf.org;
lsr-...@ietf.org; Acee Lindem (acee)
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo
Hi Shraddha,
On 03/09/2020 05:39, Shraddha Hegde wrote:
> Peter,
>
> In order to make the document clearer on this point, I wou
rg (ginsberg) ; lsr@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org;
Acee Lindem (acee)
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo
Hi Shraddha,
On 03/09/2020 05:39, Shraddha Hegde wrote:
Peter,
In order to make the document clearer on this point, I would like the
text below to be added to section 11
.@orange.com; tony...@tony.li; Robert
Raszuk
Cc: Christian Hopps ; draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo@ietf.org;
Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; lsr@ietf.org;
lsr-...@ietf.org; Acee Lindem (acee)
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo
Hi Rudy,
On 03/09/2020 11:01, Selderslaghs,
ndem (acee)
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo
Hi Shraddha,
On 03/09/2020 05:39, Shraddha Hegde wrote:
Peter,
In order to make the document clearer on this point, I would like the
text below to be added to section 11 to make it explicit that setting the L-bit
is
go@ietf.org; Les
Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; lsr@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org;
Acee Lindem (acee)
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
Hi Shraddha,
please see inline:
On 02/09/2020 06:45, Shraddha Hegde wrote:
Peter,
It is wor
ny.li; Robert Raszuk
Cc: Christian Hopps ; draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo@ietf.org;
Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; lsr@ietf.org;
lsr-...@ietf.org; Acee Lindem (acee)
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
Hi Shraddha,
please see i
27, 2020 3:34 PM
To: Shraddha Hegde ; olivier.dug...@orange.com;
tony...@tony.li; Robert Raszuk
Cc: Christian Hopps ; draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo@ietf.org; Les
Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; lsr@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org;
Acee Lindem (acee)
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo
; olivier.dug...@orange.com;
tony...@tony.li; Robert Raszuk
Cc: Christian Hopps ; draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo@ietf.org;
Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; lsr@ietf.org;
lsr-...@ietf.org; Acee Lindem (acee)
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo
[External Email. Be cautious of content
Robert Raszuk
*Cc:* Christian Hopps ;
draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo@ietf.org; Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
; lsr@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org;
Acee Lindem (acee)
*Subject:* Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo
*[External Email. Be cautious of content]*
Peter,
Le 20/08/2020 à 14:12,
.org; Acee Lindem (acee)
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
Peter,
Le 20/08/2020 à 14:12, Peter Psenak a écrit :
Hi Olivier,
On 20/08/2020 13:58,
olivier.dug...@orange.com<mailto:olivier.dug...@orange..com> wrote:
Hi Peter,
T
I have reviewed the change in -10 and it seems fine to me. Objection
withdrawn. I support publication.
Tony
> On Aug 17, 2020, at 4:47 PM, tony...@tony.li wrote:
>
>
>
>> This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after September 1st, 2020, for
>> draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo
>>
>>
>>
*Cc:* lsr@ietf.org <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>; lsr-...@ietf.org
<mailto:lsr-...@ietf.org>; Christian Hopps mailto:cho...@chopps.org>>; Acee Lindem (acee) mailto:a...@cisco.com>>; draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo....@ietf.org
<mailto:draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo@ietf.
gt;>>>> point 33.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> RFC 8570 (and its predecessor RFC 7810) define:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 34 Min/Max Unidirectional Link Delay
>>>>>>
tf.org>; Christian Hopps mailto:cho...@chopps.org>>; Acee Lindem (acee) mailto:a...@cisco.com>>; draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo@ietf.org
<mailto:draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo....@ietf.org>
*Subject:* Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo
Hi Peter,
secti
>>
>>>> an integer value.”
>>>>
>>>> It seems clear to me that the flex-draft is referring to Min
>>>> Unidirectional Link Delay in codepoint 34.
>>>>
>>>> I agree it is important to be unambiguous in specifications
.@ietf.org
<mailto:draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo@ietf.org>
*Subject:* Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo
Hi Peter,
section 5.1 of the draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo says:
Min Unidirectional Link Delay as defined in
[I-D.ietf-isis-te-ap
s been very clear.
>>
>> Please explain how you managed to end up at code point 33??
>>
>>
>>
>> Les
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Lsr mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org>> *On
>> B
; Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
; lsr@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org; Acee
Lindem (acee) ; Peter Psenak (ppsenak)
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo
Les,
There is no TLV called the Min Unidirectional Link Delay.
If the document had said “The min delay of the Min/Max Unidirectional
sday, August 18, 2020 10:03 AM
> To: Robert Raszuk
> Cc: Christian Hopps ;
> draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo....@ietf.org; Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
> ; lsr@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org; Acee
> Lindem (acee) ; Peter Psenak (ppsenak)
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-
>
>
>
> *From:* Lsr *On Behalf Of * tony...@tony.li
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 18, 2020 10:03 AM
> *To:* Robert Raszuk
> *Cc:* Christian Hopps ;
> draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo@ietf.org; Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) 40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org>; lsr@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org;
Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; lsr@ietf.org;
lsr-...@ietf.org; Acee Lindem (acee) ; Peter Psenak (ppsenak)
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo
Robert,
Thank you, exactly.
We just need a clarification of the document. I don’t understand why this is
such a big deal.
Tony
Hi Robert,
On 18/08/2020 19:10, Robert Raszuk wrote:
Hi Tony,
I am not sure what the deal is :)
But fact is that we never defined a type which this draft is referring to
"Min Unidirectional Link Delay" just does not exist in any IANA registry
so even any search for that will fail.
Perhaps
guous in specifications, but I think
>> Peter has been very clear.
>>
>> Please explain how you managed to end up at code point 33??
>>
>>
>>
>>Les
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Lsr *On Behalf Of * tony
sday, August 18, 2020 7:44 AM
> To: Peter Psenak (ppsenak) mailto:ppse...@cisco.com>>
> Cc: lsr@ietf.org <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>; lsr-...@ietf.org
> <mailto:lsr-...@ietf.org>; Christian Hopps <mailto:cho...@chopps.org>>; Acee Lindem (acee) <mailto:a...@cisco.com>>
gt;
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Lsr *On Behalf Of * tony...@tony.li
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 18, 2020 7:44 AM
> *To:* Peter Psenak (ppsenak)
> *Cc:* lsr@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org; Christian Hopps ;
> Acee Lindem (acee) ; draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Lsr] WG L
From: Lsr On Behalf Of tony...@tony.li
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2020 7:44 AM
To: Peter Psenak (ppsenak)
Cc: lsr@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org; Christian Hopps ; Acee
Lindem (acee) ; draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo
Hi Peter
Hi Peter,
> section 5.1 of the draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo says:
>
> Min Unidirectional Link Delay as defined in [I-D.ietf-isis-te-app].
>
> We explicitly say "Min Unidirectional Link Delay", so this cannot be mixed
> with other delay values (max, average).
The problem is that that does not
Hi Chris,
I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR.
thanks,
Peter
On 18/08/2020 01:30, Christian Hoppsprotocol= application/pgp-signature
wrote:
This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after September 1st, 2020, for
draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo
Hi Tony,
section 5.1 of the draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo says:
Min Unidirectional Link Delay as defined in [I-D.ietf-isis-te-app].
We explicitly say "Min Unidirectional Link Delay", so this cannot be
mixed with other delay values (max, average).
section 7.3. of ietf-isis-te-app says:
Type
: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo
This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after September 1st, 2020, for
draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo/
All authors, please indicate by sending an email to the list, whether you aware
of any other
@ietf.org
Subject: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo
This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after September 1st, 2020, for
draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo/
All authors, please indicate by sending an email to the list, whether you
> This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after September 1st, 2020, for
> draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo/
Hi,
I’d like to raise an objection.
Recently, I requested (and I thought that Peter agreed to) a clarification of
the Min
This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after September 1st, 2020, for
draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo/
All authors, please indicate by sending an email to the list, whether you aware
of any other IPR beyond what is already posted:
46 matches
Mail list logo
