[Ltsp-discuss] PXE LTSP on notebook IBM A20M

2004-11-18 Thread Oom Tommy
Hi people, I tried to boot up my notebook using its PXE with LTSP on SuSE 9.1. The notebook boot up ok and I can login and show me the KDE screen. Basically I am ready to use the notebook as I expect. The booting up is also very fast Hoever, I have problem with the keyboard that those letter

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] syslogd: cannot write to remote ....

2004-11-18 Thread Jim McQuillan
Alfredo, the syslog message is NOT causing the problem. It's only a warning that it couldn't write to the server syslog. You can fix that, by modifying the servers syslogd configuration, to include a '-r' when starting syslog This varies depending on the distro. BUT, this is NOT what is causing

[Ltsp-discuss] syslogd: cannot write to remote ....

2004-11-18 Thread Alfredo Cole
Hi: Using SuSE 8.2 and LTSP 4.1. My clients get as far as this error: rc.sysinit completed, switching to multi-session mode syslogd: cannot write to remote file handle on XX.XX.XX.XX:514 And then it hangs. The docs do not mention this error, and a search in Google mentions the problem, but off

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Students w/o Internet permission

2004-11-18 Thread Eilert
Hi Peter, that was the solution: Peter Billson schrieb: Eilert, Firewall rules are applied in order. So you need to add a rule *before* your blocking rule that says: iptables -A OUTPUT -d 127.0.0.0/24 -J ACCEPT It is -j instead of -J, but now it's running as expected. Thanks! Rolf ---

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] rom-o-matic

2004-11-18 Thread Andy Rabagliati
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Tom Allison wrote: > Oh dear... > They've added so many formats and it's been so many years since I looked > at this stuff. > > I was planning on putting a boot disk onto the /dev/hda device of these > workstations and leaving it at that. But there seems to be a lot more

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Local Application + NIS + SSH problems.

2004-11-18 Thread Amit Vyas
You need to Setup NIS, I was facing the same problem some time ago. Read the NIS/NIS+ How to..www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/NIS-HOWTO.html and go according. make there are some ssh issues also. There is a link which will help you to do that.http://www.ltsp.org/ltsp-4.html#localapps I also did xhost +

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Students w/o Internet permission

2004-11-18 Thread Peter Billson
Eilert, Firewall rules are applied in order. So you need to add a rule *before* your blocking rule that says: iptables -A OUTPUT -d 127.0.0.0/24 -J ACCEPT This will allow all localhost traffic, regardless of the owner. Pete -- http://www.elbnet.com ELB Internet Service, Inc. Web Design, Compu

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Local Application + NIS + SSH problems.

2004-11-18 Thread Martin Woolley
On Thursday 18 Nov 2004 11:25 am, Jesus Maria Vicente Saz wrote: > > # ssh thinhost2 env DISPLAY=192.168.1.2:0.0 netscape > > I connect to the machine but I can't authenticate. It's as if it can't > find the user and password. I've just been through the trauma of NIS. My notes may be of some ass

[Ltsp-discuss] Local Application + NIS + SSH problems.

2004-11-18 Thread Jesus Maria Vicente Saz
Hi all, I'm building a network based on LTSP. At the moment, everything works perfectly, but the large number of Thinstations that there are (approx. 40), the CPU load on the server is very high. Because of this I've decided to execute the heavier applications (OpenOffice and Netscape) directly

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Re: Thin Client Problems

2004-11-18 Thread Peter Childs
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi Peter > > > So I thought I would get lbe up and running to get the the bottom > > of the problem and also to try and take some load off the server... Also > > people don't like the textual boot procedure so I thought I might be able > > to cu

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Students w/o Internet permission

2004-11-18 Thread Eilert
Moin Anselm, the situation is worse than that :-( Anselm Martin Hoffmeister schrieb: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Mittwoch, 17. November 2004 08:32 schrieb Eilert: There's only one drawback: all students must be logged in when applying the barrier as for some unknown reason, no