On Saturday 06 November 2010 01:16:58 ltsp-discuss-
requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> > > I'm in the process to update the server of one of my customers. It is a
> > > small non-profit company.
> > > ...
> > > The server will run LTSP (Debian Squeeze) with KDE4 or Gnome
> > > + a virtualized
On Saturday 06 November 2010 01:16:58 ltsp-discuss-
requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> >> With RAM as cheap as it is that is not a tough or expensive thing to do,
> >> but does losing everything in /tmp on a reboot cause any problems?
> >
> >
> >
> > /tmp is always cleared on a reboot, even if
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:12 PM, P. Scott DeVos wrote:
> I would expect that firefox/flash would run firefox on one core and
> npviewer.bin on the other, typically.
While looking at youtube on a Windows terminal server I have seen high
CPU usage for the xorg (I think) and rdesktop processes on the
05.11.2010 22:00, Anton Vaaranmaa kirjoitti:
> Running "ltsp-build-client --dist lucid --arch i386" is not successful:
>
>
>
> I: Retrieving zlib1g
> I: Validating zlib1g
> I: Chosen extractor for .deb packages: dpkg-deb
> I: Extracting adduser...
> I: Extracting base-files...
> error: LTSP client
I would expect that firefox/flash would run firefox on one core and
npviewer.bin on the other, typically.
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 15:52 -0700, john wrote:
> Thank you for this reality check! I wasn't even considering whether
> firefox/flash could take advantage of the extra cores. So local apps
>
Le vendredi 5 novembre 2010 16:38:38, David Burgess a écrit :
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Xavier Brochard
wrote:
> >> don't force
> >> squid to cache over the network, it will be a pretty big bottleneck.
> >> Just buy a dedicated disk for squid, with 1 TB drives for less then
> >> $100 it's
Running "ltsp-build-client --dist lucid --arch i386" is not successful:
I: Retrieving zlib1g
I: Validating zlib1g
I: Chosen extractor for .deb packages: dpkg-deb
I: Extracting adduser...
I: Extracting base-files...
error: LTSP client installation ended abnormally
r...@hp-ltsp:~#
I have an Amd 6
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Xavier Brochard wrote:
> And what about to copy all the system in Ram, like some liveCD does?
Interesting idea for the speed demons. It's not something I've ever
tried. I once read a forum post from a guy who made a mirrored pair,
one member being the root fs, the
And what about to copy all the system in Ram, like some liveCD does?
Xavier
xav...@alternatif.org - 09 54 06 16 26
--
The Next 800 Companies to Lead America's Growth: New Video Whitepaper
David G. Thomson, author of the
Le vendredi 5 novembre 2010 18:04:32, David Burgess a écrit :
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Xavier Brochard
wrote:
> > Le vendredi 5 novembre 2010 03:30:27, David Burgess a écrit :
> >> none 2.0G 0 2.0G 0% /var/tmp
> >> none 2.0G 0 2.0G 0% /var
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Xavier Brochard wrote:
> Does it really increase the speed for loading programs if you are not the
> first
> user (because of forks and cached programs for next users)?
Honestly, I didn't do extensive testing to find out those kinds of
things. What I know for su
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Xavier Brochard wrote:
> Le vendredi 5 novembre 2010 03:30:27, David Burgess a écrit :
>> none 2.0G 0 2.0G 0% /var/tmp
>> none 2.0G 0 2.0G 0% /var/crash
>> none 2.0G 0 2.0G 0% /var/spool/cups
>
Le vendredi 5 novembre 2010 16:50:44, David Burgess a écrit :
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Xavier Brochard
wrote:
> > Do we really need RAid-0 with SSD? OK, something can allways goes wrong,
> > but now that the mechanical part (the hard drive) are away, it is
> > unlikely to happen (or else
Le vendredi 5 novembre 2010 03:30:27, David Burgess a écrit :
> none 2.0G 0 2.0G 0% /var/tmp
> none 2.0G 0 2.0G 0% /var/crash
> none 2.0G 0 2.0G 0% /var/spool/cups
> none 2.0G 564K 2.0G 1% /var/log
Why do
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Xavier Brochard wrote:
> Do we really need RAid-0 with SSD? OK, something can allways goes wrong, but
> now that the mechanical part (the hard drive) are away, it is unlikely to
> happen (or else we need to mirror the motherboard, the ram, the chipsets,
> etc.).
S
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Xavier Brochard wrote:
>> don't force
>> squid to cache over the network, it will be a pretty big bottleneck.
>> Just buy a dedicated disk for squid, with 1 TB drives for less then
>> $100 it's hard to go wrong and you don't really care if it dies. Just
>> drop an
Le mercredi 3 novembre 2010 21:17:11, David Burgess a écrit :
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Xavier Brochard
wrote:
> That said, it's important to plan for worst
> case, and future needs as well. I tend to agree with the Luke in
> recommending a 6-core CPU with a second socket for upgrading.
Le mercredi 3 novembre 2010 20:58:00, theluketaylor a écrit :
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Xavier Brochard
wrote:
> > I'm in the process to update the server of one of my customers. It is a
> > small non-profit company.
> > ...
> > The server will run LTSP (Debian Squeeze) with KDE4 or Gno
18 matches
Mail list logo
