Mike-
there is very little hassle beyond building the openmosix kernel itself when set up
in via LTSP. Use lstpa(?) utility from the LTSP contribs to coppy teh omdiscd to the
ltsp export and set it ina script to be called at client boot. Client setup and
migrating.
evan
On Sat, 9 Oct 2004
Do not forget to make sure you have the omdiscd or openmosix map with setpe installed
to your terminal home.
Evan
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 14:48:42 +0200
Maurice Libes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 03:37:42PM +0530, Ashwin Gami _7020_ wrote:
> > Dear Maurice,
> >
> > Tha
mpascal-
I am just missing something here as the idea of running 2k in vmware on an ltsp
server is seriously not cost effective be cuase you have just run the price of each 2k
lic. up by at least $120 to $300 per seat)education copy or commercial ). the money
you will save in lic alone would p
I have not been tracking LTSP 4 Dev. Does this mean that LTSP 4 willship with the X
server/client,TFTP and DHCP daemons as a package? what will happen to the script based
setup?
Evan
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 10:01:35 -0500 (EST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Charles Marcus wrote:
check the Bios. It may be saying it has more memory allocated than is actually
availble to be allocated.
Evan
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003 15:01:01 +0530
"Amit vyas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Well I tried the Magic number 3068 but still when my machine is with 32
> MB RAM it is not showing X dis
Hi-
An OpenMosix cluster as teh LSTP server workd very well and helsp keep the load spread
out over all the server machines. I was using an openmosix-LSTP server for do some
video conversion on thin clients for a while it worked out pretty well.
Evan
On Fri, 23 May 2003 06:52:23 -0700
Ed Suo
Actuall over head on the openmosix cluster is less than 2% off bandwidth( check teh
openmosix FAQ wikki). Migration though can really eat bandwidth so you do need at
least 100mb cards you can channel bond teh servers to increase the pipe though.
Evan
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 14:58:37 -0600
"Baesema
Actually openmosix would _definately_ provide help in that department. I believe you
can just mount the srver root as the node root and have all the clients lok _exactly_
like the server with no fancy work needed. As to openmosix you really need to look in
to it. JohnHopkins Universty used it to
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 19:26:38 +0100 (CET)
Piotr Giza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello everyone. It is my first post to this group since I subscribed
> to it and tried to use LTSP only yesterday :(
>
> I have been using x-terminals created by Solucorp Exterminals Project
> since 1999 (http:w
I got it installed on my box by hacking the script to see the slakware-version and
then run the Redhat 7.3 config scripts. and then transfered them manually to teh
correct locations.
Evan
On Sat, 11 Jan 2003 11:39:28 -0200
"Alexander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Can I install and
Trying to play video and response dependant games( starcraft,Q2, and the like) is
really bad over terminal session. YOu can run it via local_apps if you go teh horse
power on the terminals.
Evan
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003 16:58:42 +0200
Keresztely-Krall Gyula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all!
> I
IT is very easy to do. Just download and examine the packages to find out what you
want. LTSP is more or less just a config script( that makes life easier) for tftp,X,
and dhcp with the the ltsp_core package providing a small root file system and kernel.
That is how i do it on my slack box and h
With just about everything Microsoft you have to a client license for _EVERYTHING_
that tries to access it. In this case, It is treat just like a windows thinclient and
it does need an access lic.
Evan
On 3 Jan 2003 03:48:28 -
"amol ambekar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i am using ltsp a
Ken-
How did you setup the Maya renderfarm? am looking to set it up on an openMosix
cluster.
Evan
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 13:23:17 -0500
Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Mike Eggleston wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone know of, or are already using, a motherboard that self boots (lik
It really took very little as the needed daemons startup if the packages are
installed. I did not have to make any changes other than the ones in DHCP, and X
config files to get it working.
Evan
On Sat, 21 Dec 2002 16:13:06 -0500
Ian Trider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello ltsp-discuss-reque
Jim-
Glad to here LTSp is moving to be service centric. That should make it much more
portable also. Are tehre plans to support BSD style start scripts or just System V?
Evan
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Geek Gift Procrastinating?
G
gcc fastboot.c -o fastboot
Evan
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002 16:11:40 -0800 (PST)
pedro noticioso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> great, I found it and wherever I get it from it always
> says I have to 'compila it' 8)
>
> duuhhh how do I compile fastboot.c? 8)
>
> --- John_Cuzzola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
The real problem with what yall want is that LTSP is not really a program at all. IT
is just a fancy config script for other apps.
Evan
> Brian
>
> I agree with you. The installation process is needs to be
> perfected to the point of "hands free" or have a very smart
> automated trouble-shooter
One last thing to check here, just to be sure and to eliminate possible source, try
replacing teh host name with host ip in the root-path setting. IF this works then the
problem is in the DNS setup. Or LTSP can't do DNS lookup till after boot is finished.
If having hte IP hardcode does not work
Check the www.xfree86.org site for all the current support vidoe cards and color
information. As to information on gdm and gnomein generl run 'gnome-help-browser' to
get all the local system docs on gnome. As to an easy way to edit the gdm window
managers, in gdm under teh configuration option o
Have you check in your DHCP config files? this assigned in the boot path option
Evan
On Sun, 08 Dec 2002 09:20:17 -0500
Jim McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Getting the following messages on my LTSP terminal
>
> ... Me: 192.168.0.3, Server: 192.168.0.133, Gateway 192.168.0.121
> Loading 19
You can set ehterboot optiions to ask to boot local or net. I got my images from the
rom-o-matic site. This works well for me.
Evan
On Fri, 06 Dec 2002 23:08:25 -0600
Tom Griffing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi;
>
> I've run across a requirement where a school has a
> switched network and
Jesper-
I have notice that alot of stuff in ltsp breaks in redhat 8. Why not just but date
the RPM'S you need and not do a full blown upgrade with out need( that is so windows
:)) I would backup all the dhcp,tftp,nfs and ltsp config files before upgrading though
to be safe. After teh upgrade y
Bimal-
Exactly what is not working? the DHCP?tftp? is the workstation just no booting? What
are you seeing at the terminal?
Evan
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
pedro-
Oh yes there si a solution and I personally love showing it off to all Windoze
centric buddys cus' it is a pain if even possible to do with windows. Channel bonding(
sometimes called agregated/trunking/ramping/etc,etc) is Ideal for this particular
problem, best of all teh linux kernel c
There has been a lot of talk about using DHCP to provide balanceing between 2 LTSP
servers.I have looked in to settign up webfarmers with load-balancing using DNS. would
it not be possible to use the same basic mechanism for setting boot servers? During
DHCP you get the DNS server ip and then yo
Also take a look at the LTSP install scripts there is nothing Server side that is
actually installed.Just manually make the need changes form lstp core in the correct
config files and the server is up and running. As to the clients I think they still
have to intel based. You will also need to m
If you have a alot of heavy traffic going to the server( switch or no switch the
Server only has one nic) you can get collision problems cuasing a slow boot. I have
had this paticular problem in the past.
Evan
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002 14:06:56 -0500
Derek Dresser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoti
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002 05:13:33 -0800 (PST)
krishna bsr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]#compexrl2000 found at 0*9400,irq5,00:80:48:c4:93:7a.
>
> Display all 146 possiblite ? (y or n)
This looks like a request for a tab completion got stuck in the bootscript. It does
seem
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002 23:12:38 +0800
Stephen Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All Folks,
>
> (Etherboot ROM)
>
> Can't boot a diskless workstation. The screen hanged
>
> Starting Syslogd
> /tmp/start_ws/usr/X11R6/bin/XF86_83V : No such file or directory.
>
^^
I have been running slackware 8.1 with lstp. 3.0 and have had no trouble out of
phionex 0.5 or mozilla other than the multiple profile issue.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm Tungsten T
handheld. Power & Color in a compa
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002 13:57:56 -0500
"David Trask" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok...what about this? Is it possible to restrict the cluster to servers
> only? That way you don't transmit the Xserver stuff over the network to
> and from the clients thus possibly messing with bandwidth. Can we sim
Would you mind posting your config files? feel free to replace your real ips with
fakes of a similiar setup( actually this is recommended)
Evan
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Also lookin ot Win4lin. it should work just fine and runs lot so Win apps with out the
resource hits that vmware causes
Evan
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:06:27 -0600
Jim Kohtz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a training group that wants to put in 4 PC's as a group. Would like
> to use ltsp but all
XDMCP is normally on 177 but is udp. Have no idea what ia out at 6000 unless you
modifed your xdmcp in which case you will need make mods in the lstp.conf i think.
Evan
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 14:51:09 -0200
"Robson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi !
>
> The problem
>
> The X dont start o
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 19:42:23 -0800
"Charles N. Burns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have found that the Linux terminals can log into non-LTSP servers
> directly (that is, if I set the server I want them to log into as the XDMCP
> server in the lts.conf), but when any system but the one they boo
Screen lag. You will still need a good graphics card and x setup.Also an 8 meg
terminal won't cut it do to swapage.
Evan
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 19:02:40 -0600
"Joey Officer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This was I thought I had while eating dinner this evening, and am contemplating
>playing LAN
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002 15:10:55 -0500
rob apodaca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...
> > Would you really compare this to systems such as Tarantella, Citrix and
> > Windows Terminal Services ?
> ...
If you take a good look at Citrix( this became WTS) you will see that it does exactly
the same thing b
David-
HAve you tried just ordering it from the K12 LSTP site? They sell them for only $15
a set. Here is order URL.
http://www.riverdale.k12.or.us/linux/terminal/order.html
Evan
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002 19:04:45 +1100 (EST)
David Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm a IT Manager at a
You may have checked this already. Have you made sure the teh gigabit porta are not
with any of the 100mb ports?. I had a similiar problem uplink switchs once, turned out
hte the uplink and endport could not be used at teh same time.
Evan
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002 13:18:48 +
"garry saddington" <
We also need to know what your terminal hardware is. Though of the top of my had i
would say it is a X problem with your Video card.
Evan
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 20:23:34 -0700
Joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can not seem to get my graphical display going; all I see on the
> screen are horizo
Over at openMosix, we have a Wiki setup for the open contribution and compostion of
FAQ and Howto addition and corrections. After they have been up a while, Bruce( i
think) Goes through and makes a proper FAQ/How-to out of the Wiki additions. This
gives us the best of both worlds and takes a lar
Short answer as long as the shutdown is clean and teh server in question is not
serving the actuall data filesor home node then migrating process will never know it
is gone. as to a dirty shutdown on teh process needing said node will notice the issue.
Evan
> >
> > I assume it is not referring
First, James if you have not dones so let martin or Moshe know and they will likely
but it up on the openMosix site. second, the really big advantage to useing openMosix
with a LTSP cluster is to us the Cluster as the LTSP server, I ti sa good way to use
smaller(read Cheaper or even recycle olde
Rox even has a way to use the Filer as session manager. I use it on my LTSP
workstations.
Evan
> Rox filer and it's "pinboard" option.
>
> This will do exactly what your looking for
> and it's a great piece of software and well supported.
>
> http://rox.sourceforge.net/rox_filer.php3
>
> >
45 matches
Mail list logo
