Re: [Ltsp-discuss] sco tips - off topic

2002-10-23 Thread Chris Tooley
unity > Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0002en > > _ > Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listin

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Re: Flash & my rant

2002-08-15 Thread Chris Tooley
On the other hand it could just redirect the user at Macromedia's comment page... On Thu, 2002-08-15 at 13:59, Chris Tooley wrote: > Unfortunately this could be viewed as a publically accessible and > visible denial of service attack. At some point the quantities of > e-mail

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Re: Flash & my rant

2002-08-15 Thread Chris Tooley
ility. It is a risk and one worth weighing. Chris Tooley On Thu, 2002-08-15 at 13:30, John_Cuzzola wrote: > On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Brent Hasty wrote: > > > On Wednesday 14 August 2002 10:59, Peter Billson wrote: > > that is a most ecclent idea, I wish I knew how to do somthin

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] NFS Problems

2002-08-14 Thread Chris Tooley
Got it! And we'll be writing up the docs and creating packages for just that thing. It was truly one of the most horrific things I've ever had to do to a computer. I can honestly say, "Holy Carpfins, that was NOT what I expected." Chris Tooley On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 03:54

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] NFS Problems

2002-08-14 Thread Chris Tooley
Yeah, I'm still trying to get rpc.statd working correctly. Any hints as to how to get it working? I've got to have this working 3 days ago and I'm going to have to give up and use ssh and lpd soon. That however is not the best of the options. Chris Tooley On Wed, 2002

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] NFS Problems

2002-08-13 Thread Chris Tooley
Actually I'm wrong. rpc.lockd won't start on the server. I launch it and it immediately shuts down. Any ideas? Chris On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 11:39, John_Cuzzola wrote: > On 13 Aug 2002, Chris Tooley wrote: > > > Portmap is running on the client. rpc.lockd is on the serv

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] NFS Problems

2002-08-13 Thread Chris Tooley
Portmap is running on the client. rpc.lockd is on the server. Still no love. Chris On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 11:19, John_Cuzzola wrote: > On 13 Aug 2002, Chris Tooley wrote: > > > I'm having some serious NFS issues. I've got LTSP not really doing > > terminal

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] NFS Problems

2002-08-13 Thread Chris Tooley
Found the discussion on portmap needing to start up. Portmap is running. It will not allow me to mount my filesystems without nolock though and nolock is causing data corruption. Chris Tooley On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 10:53, Chris Tooley wrote: > I'm having some serious NFS issues. I

[Ltsp-discuss] NFS Problems

2002-08-13 Thread Chris Tooley
I'm having some serious NFS issues. I've got LTSP not really doing terminal services as much as diskless workstations and the clients are having all kinds of issues access files via NFS. Where we're really running into problems is with locking. When I remove the nolock option from the mount com

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] lost behaviour

2002-07-31 Thread Chris Tooley
Well, typically the terminals (when in X) are accessed by ctrl+alt+F1..6 and the different X desktops are accessed through Alt+F1..6. However, since Gnome and KDE have both started using the Alt modifier key to perform operations it's a little confusing. You can change your key mappings but I do

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Doing it he hard way

2002-07-26 Thread Chris Tooley
On Fri, 2002-07-26 at 15:17, Jeffrey B. Ferland wrote: > > > It feels to me that the design of LTSP is one where you're supposed to > drop > > > it into place and run it. Unfortunately, this seems rather... sparse for > > > understanding. > > > > *** Jim and the contributors have done an awesome >