Hi all:
I've got a fairly successful ltsp deployment here based on ubuntu
9.04. The last complaint I currently have from my users is the
excessive launch time of some applications. The most notable is
inkscape, which takes at least 2 minutes to show up. Other apps take
a bit longer than I'd
Hi all:
I'm setting up a thin client system here in our research lab at WSU.
We have one very important application that was home written, but
presently has a little bug that results in excessive X redraws...To
the point where running the system reasonably REQUIRES direct X and at
least 30MB/s
Hi all:
I'd like to thank those who are working on ltsp5 and CentOS/RHEL 5
integration. Right now, the biggest single hinderence to LTSP5 usage
is CentOS deployment, and as such, we are considering rolling out a
new LTSP 4.2 deployment (which does work with CentOS).
I think that given LTSP's
Hi all:
I have a very strange problem. I have a working LTSP 4.2 setup. Our
network infrastructure is built around HP Procurve switches. We have
our primary LTSP server in our machine room, and thin clients in two
buildings throughout the building. All this works fine.
Then, one of our labs
Given all the problems you're going to have getting all the libraries
and software you're going to run running in an LTSP enviornment, I'd
suggest you abandon LTSP for HPC purposes. You're better off running
something designed for HPC use, such as ROCKS cluster. There's even a
config package
Load-balancing seems to come up a lot on this list, and in my own
configuration. Its also rather difficult to do at an ideal level,
as the load is session-based. By that, I mean when a user logs in,
s/he does so on a specific server, and for the duration of that login,
the session cannot be
Hi all:
I'm running ltspfs with fuse on my server and 20 workstations. After
a couple weeks of operation, I'm now getting this when I run df -h
(which gets e-mailed to me every night):
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda2 6.8G 5.6G 848M 87% /
/dev/sda1
Hi all:
I just bought a lot of 30 Neoware Eon's from a computer referbishing
company with the intention of following Roy's advice in a past thread
about dropping in a PCI graphics card into these clients.
Unfortunately, I'm running into difficulty.
I have 30 Eon 2000E's (it was a all-or-nothing
From your initial post, it sounds like the AC and CAT5 will each be in
their own conduit (i.e., the AC will NOT be running in the SAME
conduit as the cat-5). If this is the case, I suspect you'll be fine
with 100Mbps..Don't know about Gig, though.
If you're concerned, running shielded cable (and
I've got a Devon IT $139 thin client (400Mhz fanless model); its
great. No problems, it just worked with LTSP. We're probably going
to use that for all our single-headed thin clients (still looking for
a cost-effective dual-head solution). Also would like to find a
cost-effective accelerated
On 3/9/07, Sudev Barar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/03/07, Scott Balneaves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone the LTSP developers know quite well struggled with Sunrays for 2
years. He's recently switched to LTSP.
His comment? Should have done this two years ago!
'Nuff said.
I'd be
Hi all:
So, my boss just went and sold to his bosses the idea of using LTSP in our
Electrical Engineering coding lab. This is a good thing, except a firm
requirement for all these systems is that the users must be able to plug in
their EE boards (Xilinx/Digilent FPGAs) into the systems USB port
to what sessions, and more importantly,
making sure that they only show up to / are usable from that session.
Thoughts?
--Jim
On 2/15/07, Jim Kusznir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all:
So, my boss just went and sold to his bosses the idea of using LTSP in our
Electrical Engineering coding lab
I had NeoWare thin client here (the one with the embedded display), and ran
into the same problem. No mater what I did, I could not get X to show up on
the display (DVI or CRT).
I did have a shell screen and tried to start X manually there. After days
of troubleshooting, I still recieved no
Yea, I just read it too and was amazed at the complete lack of competence in
the company (actually, it looks like they have a few pro-Micro$oft engineers
who started slinging the FUD as much as possible to prevent themselves from
actually having to learn anything about linux.
Unfortunately, the
Hi All:
We recently discovered JackPC (http://www.chippc.com/products/jackpc/). The
product looks really cool; its very small (fits into a standard single-gang
network box), uses little power (powered by PoE; uses only 5W), and appears
to be reasonably powerful. In addition, its in the nomral
16 matches
Mail list logo
