I did not realize Sun Ray's are a dead end. Has Sun stated they will no
longer produce them?
Michael Marschall
President
Pipeline Networks
2385 Executive Center Drive Suite 100
Boca Raton, Florida 33431
Phone 561.962.2774
Cell 305.502.8959
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, John McCreesh wrote:
> I
something like Citrix Metaframe it is highly suggested to turn off things
such as screen savers.
Michael Marschall
President
Pipeline Networks
2385 Executive Center Drive Suite 100
Boca Raton, Florida 33431
Phone 561.962.2774
Cell 305.502.8959
On 2 Jan 2003, Baeseman, Clifford wrote:
> I do
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, John McCreesh wrote:
> I don't know what the sales of the Cobalt Qube (now owned by Sun) are.
> It's operating in a similar space. If Sun's marketing honchos had half a
> brain they'd be doing an 'Office Qube' running LTSP, StarOffice, and
> Samba to provide MS-Office in a box
viruses for all (web) users.
> Most (of my) customers won't even consider Linux on the workstation
> until an Office package comes along where at least the Wordprocessor
> work and feels exactly like MS Word/Office.
> Is that menu layout, and functionality proprietary to MS ?.
s Linux; it's that thin client computing is still on the outside
looking in. Microsoft has effectively marketed their way around thin
client computing. Linux gaining significant market share in every aspect
of computing is an inevitability. I believe Linux Terminal Server is a
natural step
Sun Ray's do not use X as their display protocol. They use a frame
buffered display image sent from the server. It is lighter than X and
allows for things such as session state management. I do not think they
can be an X based client, whether with ltsp or without.
Michael Marschall
Pres
Sun Ray's can do this with or without the Smart Cards. All session info is
stored on the server.
Michael
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Jim Wildman wrote:
> You forgot a step. The SunRays (at least the ones I've seen) use a
> smart card as ID. The information in the smart card is used to store
> the se
With the exception that the users currently logged in to the server
that goes down will lose their sessions, a reboot of the workstations
should give a login prompt to the server that is left.
Actually you will not need to reboot the workstations. Either the X
server will stop and XDMCP will go o
I have ltsp setup on a 333mhz P2 and 256MB of ram. My girlfriend and I use
it simulteneously and the ram usage never gets above 110MB.
Is it me or are people going RAM crazy?
Michael
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi !
>
> I have a really good working LTSP-solution running at h
On Fri, 26 Jul 2002, John Holbrook wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2002 15:10:42 +0200
> Mike Arends <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > try rdesktop on any Linux distribution.
> >
> > Works great and is for free of course...
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Mike
> >
> >
> But its not free!!
>
> If you're runn
On Thu, 25 Jul 2002, Bhaskar S. Manda wrote:
>
> > At the moment we are running Windows terminal server client to access
> terminal services running on Windows NT and 2000. I need a client to run on
> SuSE linux and received and email about Winconnect from ThinSoft that will do
> the job. On se
You can tlel the Samba server to forward all the authetication to a
windows NT DC. So yes you can have one set of user accounts.
Michael
On Thu, 25 Jul 2002, David Leuser II wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Some 75% of our users (a lot of them) will be using both our Windows
> NT/2000 domain machines and o
It also avoids the situation where your system becomes more or less
unuseable due to some log in /var filling up the filesystem.
Michael
On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, Jim Wildman wrote:
> The other important directory to have its own partition is /var. If a
> machine crashes, there will be open files i
Cool thanks. That is what I was missing.
Michael
On Thu, 18 Jul 2002, Nigel Smith wrote:
> On Thursday 18 July 2002 1:20 pm, Michael Marschall wrote:
> > I keep seeing VNC as an alternative to X, but unless they haver changed
> > something recently isn't VNC a one to one d
I keep seeing VNC as an alternative to X, but unless they haver changed
something recently isn't VNC a one to one desktop tool (meaning only one
person can run the desktop at on a server at any given time). To me t his
is not an alternative for a distributed application setup.
Michael
On Thu, 18
:), but your symptoms are a
common problem when encrypted paswords are not set and Win98 users cannot
access shares.
Michael
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Bob Latham wrote:
> In article
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>Michael Marschall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You might wa
used
to send passwords all over the network via clear text. You may think you
know all your user and that none of them would do anything worng, but you
never know.
michael
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Bob Latham wrote:
> In article
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Michael Marschall <[
Set the passwords to be encrypted in the global section of your smb.conf.
This will solve the
problem.
Michael
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Bob Latham wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've now got 2 works stations working with LTSP with printing and Open
> Office. That may not sound much to you experts but to me it's g
e any software you have come across which is
> very fast.
> I have tried Xwin32 also.
>
> regards
> Dinesh
>
> Michael Marschall wrote:
>
> > You do not need LTSP for this. The X Windows system was created to provide
> > seemless network distribution of applicatio
The X Window system was made for what would equate to "Publishing"
(Citrix's term for running a single application over an ICA session). All
he must do is make sure that he has some kind of X Server software running
on the windows machine and redirect the output of the application to it.
The easie
I setup true type fonts with XFS and the script from this site:
http://gongolo.usr.dsi.unimi.it/~vigna/webFonts4Linux/
The script will go out and automatically grab the true type fonts and
install them to your machine/ Then it will add the proper line to your
font path.
No need to do anything f
My suggestion for groupware is phpgroupware. It has just about everything
you can want in a groupware suite.
www.phpgroupware.org
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Mark Farey wrote:
>
> > Collaborative calendaring if really used, has a couple *nix
> > solutions whcih are price competitive. But the Corel Wo
To add a point. my clients load in no more than 30 seconds.
michael
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Lowe, Scott wrote:
>
> Hi Scott -- Russ Herrold here -- when I was an AAG on Ohio,
> first in a line department regulating charitable
> soliticacions, and them on C
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Ken Barber wrote:
> The User Private Groups (UPG) scheme is unique to Red Hat, and IMO is a bit
> ridiculous. I've never used them.
>
> It has been my practice to create groups that actually do something useful,
> such as "faculty", "students", "finaid" and so on.
This can
Joey,
It would be great if you could explain your setup for us a little more
in-depth. It sounded like you got things working well enough to deploy. To
know what you used and what you ran into along the way would go along way
for many of us. That is if you do not mind taking the time.
Michael
O
Why just turn on the spash screen option?
/path/to/mozilla/mozilla -splash
This will let the user know the browser is coming.
Michael
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, Darel Finkbeiner wrote:
> Any hope of getting a copy of that script?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Billson [mailto:[EMAIL
26 matches
Mail list logo
