Re: [Ltsp-discuss] A forking we will go?

2002-12-20 Thread Dave Bukove
I had and have similar problems getting X to work in lts 3.0. I have gotten the machines to boot and work, but only with XFree 3.3.6 servers. I can't seem to get 4.0 servers to work for the life of me. I have tried different video cards and have used some of those cards previously with xfree 4, so

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] A forking we will go?

2002-12-18 Thread Brian Fahrlander
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 17:00:39 -0500 (EST), Julius Szelagiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Brian, > your wish has been granted by k12osn. Eric's cd set installs > flawlessly, without fuss, and works like a charm. it uses rh 7.3 or 8 > (still beta, but really good) and supports just about an

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] A forking we will go?

2002-12-18 Thread Brian Fahrlander
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002 09:22:54 -0500 (EST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Brian, > > The problem you are having with the blank screen in X windows is > exactly the same problem, whether you are dealing with LTSP 2.x > or LTSP 3.x. This is a Server issue with your display manager. > it makes no differ

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] A forking we will go?

2002-12-18 Thread Brian Fahrlander
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002 21:29:35 +0800 (WST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi Brian > > I utterly conceed your opinion to you , but I totally dis-agree. > I've installed LTSP on literly 100's servers from old-isa to latest MBs. > It has never been so easy as it is now. I use PXEstuff to boot all PXE >

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] A forking we will go?

2002-12-18 Thread jam
Brian, The problem you are having with the blank screen in X windows is exactly the same problem, whether you are dealing with LTSP 2.x or LTSP 3.x. This is a Server issue with your display manager. it makes no difference which version of ltsp. And the problem that I think you were having with b

[Ltsp-discuss] A forking we will go?

2002-12-18 Thread jam
Hi Brian > I'm a big believer in LTSP; when I installed 2.x it was fast, simple = > and light. But I've made two, seperate, multi-week install attempts on 3= > .x and have yet to see an X login screen. And trying to debug it, even a= > fter knowing how to do it before, was darned near imposs

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] A forking we will go?

2002-12-17 Thread Julius Szelagiewicz
Brian, your wish has been granted by k12osn. Eric's cd set installs flawlessly, without fuss, and works like a charm. it uses rh 7.3 or 8 (still beta, but really good) and supports just about any workstation out of the box. if it wasn't for k12os, i'd still be struggling with the install in

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] A forking we will go?

2002-12-17 Thread Brian Fahrlander
On 17 Dec 2002 15:24:09 -0500, Joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I installed the rpm's on RH8.0 and it worked. > > What is the problem anyway? I spent a great deal of time getting a network-bootable card to come up...even after I read the FAQ. Then I eventually dumped it, using instead a

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] A forking we will go?

2002-12-17 Thread Joseph
I installed the rpm's on RH8.0 and it worked. What is the problem anyway? On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 15:04, Brian Fahrlander wrote: > > I'm a big believer in LTSP; when I installed 2.x it was fast, simple and light. >But I've made two, seperate, multi-week install attempts on 3.x and have yet

[Ltsp-discuss] A forking we will go?

2002-12-17 Thread Brian Fahrlander
I'm a big believer in LTSP; when I installed 2.x it was fast, simple and light. But I've made two, seperate, multi-week install attempts on 3.x and have yet to see an X login screen. And trying to debug it, even after knowing how to do it before, was darned near impossible. This is n