[Ltsp-discuss] Debian Jessie amd64 using nbd i386 client

2014-08-12 Thread richard kweskin
Hello All Following the sucess with Jessie i386 I tried many of the same steps with an installation already in use without ltsp. The steps: 1 install dnsmasq ltsp-server-standalone ltsp-client lxde 2 add loop to /etc/modules and reboot the server 3 ltsp-config dnsmasq and edit to comment out dh

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Debian Jessie amd64 using nbd i386 client

2014-08-12 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2014-08-12, richard kweskin wrote: > Following the sucess with Jessie i386 I tried many of the same steps > with an installation already in use without ltsp. > > The steps: > > 1 install dnsmasq ltsp-server-standalone ltsp-client lxde No need to install ltsp-client on the server unless you're

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Debian Jessie amd64 using nbd i386 client

2014-08-13 Thread richard kweskin
On 2014-08-13 02:04, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > On 2014-08-12, richard kweskin wrote: snip >> 5 edit /etc/ltsp/update-kernels.conf to have BOOT_METHODS=NBD, >> ARCH="i386" and IPAPPEND=3 uncommented snip >> 8 patched /usr/share/ltsp/update-kernels >> 9 aptitude install pxelinux snip > ltsp-bu

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Debian Jessie amd64 using nbd i386 client

2014-08-13 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2014-08-13, richard kweskin wrote: > On 2014-08-13 02:04, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >> On 2014-08-12, richard kweskin wrote: >>> 5 edit /etc/ltsp/update-kernels.conf to have BOOT_METHODS=NBD, >>> ARCH="i386" and IPAPPEND=3 uncommented >>> 8 patched /usr/share/ltsp/update-kernels >>> 9 aptitude i

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Debian Jessie amd64 using nbd i386 client

2014-08-14 Thread richard kweskin
On 2014-08-13 18:58, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > On 2014-08-13, richard kweskin wrote: >> On 2014-08-13 02:04, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >>> On 2014-08-12, richard kweskin wrote: > 5 edit /etc/ltsp/update-kernels.conf to have BOOT_METHODS=NBD, ARCH="i386" and IPAPPEND=3 uncommented 8 p

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Debian Jessie amd64 using nbd i386 client

2014-08-14 Thread richard kweskin
On 2014-08-14 13:35, richard kweskin wrote: > On 2014-08-13 18:58, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >> On 2014-08-13, richard kweskin wrote: >>> On 2014-08-13 02:04, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: On 2014-08-12, richard kweskin wrote: snip > I agree. However, there are cases in which the above method is u

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Debian Jessie amd64 using nbd i386 client

2014-08-14 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2014-08-14, richard kweskin wrote: > 9 patched /usr/share/ltsp/update-kernels (using > > http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ltsp-upstream/ltsp/ltsp-trunk/revision/2569 > > http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ltsp-upstream/ltsp/ltsp-trunk/revision/2570 > ) > > 10 aptitude install pxelinux These two

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Debian Jessie amd64 using nbd i386 client

2014-08-14 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2014-08-14, richard kweskin wrote: > was creating the squashfs image in amd64 but for clients in i386 it was > using 2 processors and of course took less time, but in the earlier > configuration in i386 it used only one processor. ... > Is it possible that some hardware only has access to both

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Debian Jessie amd64 using nbd i386 client

2014-08-15 Thread richard kweskin
On 2014-08-14 18:55, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > On 2014-08-14, richard kweskin wrote: > >> 9 patched /usr/share/ltsp/update-kernels (using >> >> >> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ltsp-upstream/ltsp/ltsp-trunk/revision/2569 >> >> >> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ltsp-upstream/ltsp/ltsp-trunk/revision

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Debian Jessie amd64 using nbd i386 client

2014-08-15 Thread richard kweskin
On 2014-08-14 19:01, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: snip > The -486 kernel only supports a single CPU. You'll want either a > -686-pae > or -amd64 kernel running on your server. > > If you're using ltsp-pnp, you'll want to install both the > linux-image-486 and linux-image-686-pae and/or linux-image-a

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Debian Jessie amd64 using nbd i386 client

2014-08-15 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2014-08-15, richard kweskin wrote: > In /etc/ltsp/update-kernels.conf the line > > LIST_KERNELS_DEFAULT="486" > > is for older clients and > > LIST_KERNELS_DEFAULT="686-pae" > > is for capable clients. > > Is the one line appropriate for all the clients so that one must put > the lowest common