Re: [Ltsp-discuss] GDM 2.20.1 XDMCP maximum session problems

2007-11-27 Thread Oliver Grawert
hi, On Mo, 2007-11-26 at 22:25 -0700, Andrew Ziem wrote: I caution any LTSP admins to avoid GDM 2.20.x until the problem is resolved. we didnt use GDM since two years in LTSP ... even though you can forcefully enable XDMCP. using ldm with the LDM_DIRECTX variable set operates at the same speed as

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] GDM 2.20.1 XDMCP maximum session problems

2007-11-27 Thread Andrew Ziem
On Mo, 2007-11-26 at 22:25 -0700, Andrew Ziem wrote: I caution any LTSP admins to avoid GDM 2.20.x until the problem is resolved. Just after GDM 2.20.2 was released, I submitted a patch that may help with the GDM XDMCP problem. we didnt use GDM since two years in LTSP ... even though you

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] GDM 2.20.1 XDMCP maximum session problems

2007-11-27 Thread Oliver Grawert
hi, On Di, 2007-11-27 at 08:15 -0700, Andrew Ziem wrote: well, warren is working hard on gettinfg a maintained ltsp version into fedora ... i'm sure he'd love to see some testers if he releases his code :) When you say there is no speed difference, do you mean just for light use? What about

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] GDM 2.20.1 XDMCP maximum session problems

2007-11-26 Thread Andrew Ziem
Frank Cox wrote: On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 11:57:39 -0700 (MST) Andrew Ziem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My main problem is I cannot define the maximum number of sessions, which stays at the default of 16. Indeed. As I stated earlier, there is at least one bug report regarding this matter

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] GDM 2.20.1 XDMCP maximum session problems

2007-11-26 Thread Frank Cox
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 22:25:56 -0700 Andrew Ziem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: While this MaxSessions problem is now solved in GDM's 2.20.x SVN, Gnome bug 495623* is making LTSP impossible with GDM 2.20.1. At some point, GDM stops accepting XDMCP. I downgraded to 2.18.4 from Fedora 7's

[Ltsp-discuss] GDM 2.20.1 XDMCP maximum session problems

2007-11-19 Thread Andrew Ziem
Hi, Do others have GDM 2.20.x working? I am having headaches after upgrading Fedora Core 6 to Fedora 8 with gdm-2.20.1-7.fc8. A lot of stations login just fine, but I can't change the default value for MaxSessions from 16. Nov 19 08:31:24 lucy gdm-binary[14678]: DEBUG:

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] GDM 2.20.1 XDMCP maximum session problems

2007-11-19 Thread Frank Cox
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 08:36:22 -0700 (MST) Andrew Ziem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do others have GDM 2.20.x working? I am having headaches after upgrading Fedora Core 6 to Fedora 8 with gdm-2.20.1-7.fc8. A lot of stations login just fine, but I can't change the default value for MaxSessions from

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] GDM 2.20.1 XDMCP maximum session problems

2007-11-19 Thread Francis Giraldeau
Frank Cox a écrit : On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 08:36:22 -0700 (MST) Andrew Ziem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do others have GDM 2.20.x working? I am having headaches after upgrading Fedora Core 6 to Fedora 8 with gdm-2.20.1-7.fc8. A lot of stations login just fine, but I can't change the default

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] GDM 2.20.1 XDMCP maximum session problems

2007-11-19 Thread Frank Cox
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:53:21 -0500 Francis Giraldeau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This bug is already solved upstream, and update for gutsy are out today. Dandy! It should still be filed on bugzilla.redhat.com so the F8 gdm gets fixed as well. If the bug report contains the fix as well, then so

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] GDM 2.20.1 XDMCP maximum session problems

2007-11-19 Thread Andrew Ziem
Frank Cox a écrit : On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 08:36:22 -0700 (MST) Andrew Ziem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do others have GDM 2.20.x working? I am having headaches after upgrading Fedora Core 6 to Fedora 8 with gdm-2.20.1-7.fc8. A lot of stations login just fine, but I can't change the default

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] GDM 2.20.1 XDMCP maximum session problems

2007-11-19 Thread Frank Cox
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 11:57:39 -0700 (MST) Andrew Ziem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My main problem is I cannot define the maximum number of sessions, which stays at the default of 16. Indeed. As I stated earlier, there is at least one bug report regarding this matter on the Ubuntu bugzilla as