Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Grub for dos

2007-03-11 Thread jam
On Saturday 10 March 2007 01:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > About the only usefulness I could see is integrating it into pxe > > syslinux, disable local hard disk booting, enable only pxe boot and cd > > boots, and then when the system boots, the grub configuration would > > allow them to choose

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Grub for dos

2007-03-09 Thread Dave Fenwick
It's a decent solution when it's rolled into the pxe boot loader. In that case it's rolled directly into the network boot, which means you never have to deal with it on local media. However, it's not really a "new" thing. For instance, I have roughly 100 thin clients and another 100 thick client

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Grub for dos

2007-03-09 Thread Asmo Koskinen
Dave Fenwick kirjoitti: > About the only usefulness I could see is integrating it into pxe > syslinux, disable local hard disk booting, enable only pxe boot and cd > boots, and then when the system boots, the grub configuration would > allow them to choose whatever load path they want to choose. >

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Grub for dos

2007-03-09 Thread Dave Fenwick
I'm not sure I see what use it would really be. It seems to just be a real mode dos implementation of the grub configuration and loader. I can see a use for it if you're running in a multiboot environment (linux, windows, dos) but I don't see it having much to do with ltsp. If someone's a teache

[Ltsp-discuss] Grub for dos

2007-03-08 Thread Asmo Koskinen
Hi list, can this be working solution for teachers with XP, anybody using it? There is no need for dual boot and xdmcp - or fat linux client with xdmcp as I use on my laptop? http://sourceforge.net/projects/grub4dos/ Best regards Asmo Koskinen.