Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Sizing of hardware + infrastructure parameters

2001-09-21 Thread Mark Evans
> > Remember if all the traffic is between the workstations and the server, > i.e the workstations don't talk to each other (no local apps), then most > of the benefit of a switch is wasted in an LTSP environment because the > traffic performance limit will be the link between the server and the

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Sizing of hardware + infrastructure parameters

2001-09-20 Thread Peter Rundle
>> It's now a switch, but the hub didn't seem to be a problem. Remember if all the traffic is between the workstations and the server, i.e the workstations don't talk to each other (no local apps), then most of the benefit of a switch is wasted in an LTSP environment because the traffic performa

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Sizing of hardware + infrastructure parameters

2001-09-18 Thread Derek Dresser
> So the Dell box is only apps, cpu and ram for the clients, the major > file > system is on a different box? Do you mount that NFS system straight into > the > X-terminals or through the Dell? > The Dell server mounts the user filesystems on the Netware box. __

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Sizing of hardware + infrastructure parameters

2001-09-18 Thread Ragnar Wisløff
tirsdag 18. september 2001 02:22 skrev du : > I am running a Dual Pentium III 733MHz Dell with 2GB of RAM. Our user's > file systems are mounted via NFS on a Netware box. We have about 300 > potential users and right now about 25 on at a time. We are adding > terminals and X windows servers to

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Sizing of hardware + infrastructure parameters

2001-09-17 Thread Ragnar Wisløff
tirsdag 18. september 2001 00:17 skrev du : > I read this not too long ago. Not exactly what you're > asking for, but it may help. Thanks. I knew about Largo, but not these details. I can't believe the RAM usage - less than 15 MB per user! Sounds really good. -- Ragnar Wisløff -- life

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Sizing of hardware + infrastructure parameters

2001-09-17 Thread Derek Dresser
I am running a Dual Pentium III 733MHz Dell with 2GB of RAM. Our user's file systems are mounted via NFS on a Netware box. We have about 300 potential users and right now about 25 on at a time. We are adding terminals and X windows servers to Windoze machines so that usage will be climbing.

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Sizing of hardware + infrastructure parameters

2001-09-17 Thread Jim O'Quinn
I read this not too long ago. Not exactly what you're asking for, but it may help. http://eltoday.com/article.php3?ltsn=2001-07-23-001-14-PS Jim Ragnar Wisløff wrote: > > Hi, > > I've not found any hard figures for what the sensible sizing of an ltsp based > network should be. Linux' good

[Ltsp-discuss] Sizing of hardware + infrastructure parameters

2001-09-17 Thread Ragnar Wisløff
Hi, I've not found any hard figures for what the sensible sizing of an ltsp based network should be. Linux' good use of buffers and cache makes it difficult to evaluate on a little network how the thing will scale. I've been trying out three X-terminals against a box with 384 MB RAM, and that