Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 06:06:27AM -0400, Michael George wrote:
>> The technique used to make kphone work was to run the phone application
>> on the terminal as a local app.
>
> OK, but that's too much work for mere mortals. I am waiting for
> something that is easy to
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 06:06:27AM -0400, Michael George wrote:
> The technique used to make kphone work was to run the phone application
> on the terminal as a local app.
OK, but that's too much work for mere mortals. I am waiting for
something that is easy to install.
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 10:38:43AM +0200, "Troels E. N?rm?lle" wrote:
> Hi Everyone.
>
> We have been using LTSP4.2 since january with great success and would
> now like to run softphones on our terminals. I have used twinkle before
> and would like to use it for our terminals. I tried google a
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 10:38:43AM +0200, "Troels E. Nørmølle" wrote:
> We have been using LTSP4.2 since january with great success and would
> now like to run softphones on our terminals. I have used twinkle before
> and would like to use it for our terminals. I tried google and it gave
> me t
Hi Everyone.
We have been using LTSP4.2 since january with great success and would
now like to run softphones on our terminals. I have used twinkle before
and would like to use it for our terminals. I tried google and it gave
me the article from the Linux Journal
(http://www.linuxjournal.com/
