Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Virtualizing/Clustering

2011-12-15 Thread Mike Cammilleri
Thanks for the ideas. We are a statistics research department, so folks are very keen on where they run their apps since any given simulation may have different RAM and processing requirements. So really, the only thing I want to virtualize is the X session itself. All they do in the X session

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Virtualizing/Clustering

2011-12-13 Thread Peter Scheie
One approach worth considering would be to dedicate specific applications to their own isolated server on the backend. This wouldn't reduce the number of server machines you have, but it would allow you to devote hardware resources to those apps that need it, and not waste hardware on those th

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Virtualizing/Clustering

2011-12-13 Thread Jeff Siddall
Statistical load spreading should be trivial -- just a matter of sharing home directories and then spreading your clients around your various servers. True load balancing? I have no idea if/how that would work. Hopefully someone else can answer that. Jeff ---

[Ltsp-discuss] Virtualizing/Clustering

2011-12-13 Thread Mike Cammilleri
There's such a huge amount of products (commercial) and so many options open-source that I would just like a little feedback as to what others would do in this situation. I have 80 thin-clients that boot off of an LTSP server that is pretty bare bones. The user is presented with a login script