Re: [Ltsp-discuss] ltsp 4.2 Fedora 8 x86_64

2007-11-14 Thread Frank Cox
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:38:26 -0300 Alexandre Cavalcante Alencar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > check your XDMCP Done, checked, re-checked, and compared to my currently working Centos 5 LTSP setup. > and Firewal settings. Disabled for testing purposes, to no effect whatsoever. -- MELVILLE THEAT

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] ltsp 4.2 Fedora 8 x86_64

2007-11-14 Thread Alexandre Cavalcante Alencar
Hi, By default, XDMCP don't allow remote connections and default fedora firewall just allow ssh, check your XDMCP and Firewal settings. On Nov 12, 2007 5:34 PM, Frank Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm stuck. > > I have set up a "pure" x86_64 system using Fedora 8 with no i386 libraries at > al

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] ltsp 4.2 Fedora 8 x86_64

2007-11-13 Thread Frank Cox
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 07:18:43 +0900 jam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Solve your server running XDMCP. It all does work, XDMCP and LDM on 32 > and 64 hosts. ltsp cannot work until your remote login works I agree completely. Unfortunately, while I'm reasonably sure that I have the XDMCP and GDM set

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] ltsp 4.2 Fedora 8 x86_64

2007-11-13 Thread jam
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 06:30 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >You do not need any i386 libs on the server side. But your NFS > >exported root is fully i386. > > That's the way I thought (hoped) it would work. I figured the whole > of the > i386 stuff would be contained within the ltsp directory

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] ltsp 4.2 Fedora 8 x86_64

2007-11-12 Thread Frank Cox
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 23:57:32 +0100 Sebastien Koechlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry, you have to walk to the console of this computer, because this > command launch a second X server on the computer and ask it to connect > to you LTSP server. I see. I just did that very thing. I got the gr

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] ltsp 4.2 Fedora 8 x86_64

2007-11-12 Thread Sebastien Koechlin
> > Can you connect a working linux computer on the system; go on a > > virtual text console and launch 'X :1 -query a.b.c.d' where a.b.c.d is > > the LTSP server IP address. > > I'm not entirely sure what I'm supposed to see when I do this. > > I just ssh-ed into another computer on my network and

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] ltsp 4.2 Fedora 8 x86_64

2007-11-12 Thread Frank Cox
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 23:14:34 +0100 Sebastien Koechlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >You do not need any i386 libs on the server side. But your NFS >exported root is fully i386. That's the way I thought (hoped) it would work. I figured the whole of the i386 stuff would be contained within the ltsp

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] ltsp 4.2 Fedora 8 x86_64

2007-11-12 Thread Sebastien Koechlin
On Nov 12, 2007 9:34 PM, Frank Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have set up a "pure" x86_64 system using Fedora 8 with no i386 libraries at > all. You do not need any i386 libs on the server side. But your NFS exported root is fully i386. > I have set up LTSP 4.2 on this machine and my terminal

[Ltsp-discuss] ltsp 4.2 Fedora 8 x86_64

2007-11-12 Thread Frank Cox
I'm stuck. I have set up a "pure" x86_64 system using Fedora 8 with no i386 libraries at all. I have set up LTSP 4.2 on this machine and my terminal boots up to the point where it should load gdm and at that point I get the infamous grey screen with an X in the middle. I went through my gdm conf