Re: [Ltsp-discuss] server harware

2003-01-17 Thread garry
On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 18:14, Werner Winter wrote: > Hello, > we set up a test terminal server and it worked well. So we want to buy a new server >hardware (about > 15 KDE-terminals). Is the following ok? > > Pentium4 2,4GHz (or is a dual pentium better?) > 2GB RAM > SCSI-HD 36GB In my experience

RE: [Ltsp-discuss] server harware

2003-01-17 Thread Baeseman, Cliff
I am running about 60 terminals on a machine half that size, it also runs nfs for our shop floor brake presses and a postgres server that gets really hammered on. KDE 2.1 I cannot say enough about ram, you need ram ram and more ram the processors rarely hit 30% utilization. Cliff > On Frida

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] server harware

2003-01-17 Thread Ken Cobler
Peter Childs wrote: On Friday 17 January 2003 18:14, Werner Winter wrote: Hello, we set up a test terminal server and it worked well. So we want to buy a new server hardware (about 15 KDE-terminals). Is the following ok? Pentium4 2,4GHz (or is a dual pentium better?) 2GB RAM SCSI-HD 36GB Wer

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] server harware

2003-01-17 Thread Dieter Kroemer
Hi, > I think about that configuration, and I belive 2 processors (P4 2.4GHz) > with 2GB RAM can support 30 LTSP stations with KDE 3. No I don't think so. I worked with 1GB and 15 terminals with and it was s slow :-( - Of course kde3 needs ca 64MB per terminal and 64*15=960; there is no

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] server harware

2003-01-17 Thread pedro noticioso
Pentium [EMAIL PROTECTED] is just ok, my 1.5 is still quite fast 8) 2GB RAM is great, 800 bus is even better 8) The price of a SCSI does not make it a worth while investment because it will die anyway, Id rather buy 2 IDE 7200 speed or faster hard drives, use the first hd for the sever and secon

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] server harware

2003-01-17 Thread Jeff Roberts
We are currently serving about 25 desktops running qvwm with a dual p2-400 with 1gig of ram and an 18 gig scsi drive. we used redhat 8 for the install. Our previous server, which was working fine, except I dont like editing gnome menus for large groups, was a dual p2-300 with only 512 megs of ra

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] server harware

2003-01-17 Thread pedro noticioso
r Winter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 4:14 PM > Subject: [Ltsp-discuss] server harware > > > > Hello, > > we set up a test terminal server and it worked > well. So we want to buy a > new server

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] server harware

2003-01-17 Thread Peter Childs
On Friday 17 January 2003 18:14, Werner Winter wrote: > Hello, > we set up a test terminal server and it worked well. So we want to buy a > new server hardware (about 15 KDE-terminals). Is the following ok? > > Pentium4 2,4GHz (or is a dual pentium better?) > 2GB RAM > SCSI-HD 36GB > > Werner >

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] server harware

2003-01-17 Thread Márcio de Sousa Pessoa
: "Werner Winter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 4:14 PM Subject: [Ltsp-discuss] server harware > Hello, > we set up a test terminal server and it worked well. So we want to buy a new server hardware (about > 15 KDE-terminals). Is

[Ltsp-discuss] server harware

2003-01-17 Thread Werner Winter
Hello, we set up a test terminal server and it worked well. So we want to buy a new server hardware (about 15 KDE-terminals). Is the following ok? Pentium4 2,4GHz (or is a dual pentium better?) 2GB RAM SCSI-HD 36GB Werner --- This SF.NET e